On Jan 9, 2008 12:45 AM, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 05:54:58PM -0300, Andr?s wrote:
Jacob Meuser wrote:
the current audio system actually supports a wider variety of audio
devices.
Sorry for the non-technically-based question but, couldn't OpenBSD
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:21:01AM +, Matthew Szudzik wrote:
There is also the question of ALSA compatibility layer which is in my
understanding slowly incorporated into OSS. Is it really important to have
ALSA compatibility layer? Can somebody give me an example of the software
which
Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that would require kernel level ALSA emulation, just as we have kernel
level OSS emulation for linux binaries using OSS. I have absolutely
no interest in that whatsoever. you'd have better luck convincing
Adobe to make an OpenBSD native version of their
Jonathan Schleifer writes:
Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that would require kernel level ALSA emulation, just as we
have kernel level OSS emulation for linux binaries using OSS.
I have absolutely no interest in that whatsoever. you'd have
better luck convincing Adobe to make an
On Jan 9, 2008 4:10 PM, Deanna Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonathan Schleifer writes:
Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that would require kernel level ALSA emulation, just as we
have kernel level OSS emulation for linux binaries using OSS.
I have absolutely no interest in
Deanna Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should a worthy
alsa-only *open source* app appear, I'm sure that someone could
port it to Sun audio.
What about libjingle for example? It's opensource and used by all
Jabber clients which support VoIP - and it only supports ALSA (at least
the last
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:45:21PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Deanna Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should a worthy
alsa-only *open source* app appear, I'm sure that someone could
port it to Sun audio.
What about libjingle for example? It's opensource and used by all
Jabber
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:14:27PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that would require kernel level ALSA emulation, just as we have kernel
level OSS emulation for linux binaries using OSS. I have absolutely
no interest in that whatsoever. you'd have
Deanna Phillips writes:
But for Linux binary emulation? No way. If you want that, run
Linux. What kind of people run Linux binaries on OpenBSD,
anyway? Don't give me that I need Flash, since I spent months
of my life working on Gnash for OpenBSD just so you wouldn't
have to use the
Marco S Hyman writes:
Deanna Phillips writes:
But for Linux binary emulation? No way. If you want that, run
Linux. What kind of people run Linux binaries on OpenBSD,
anyway? Don't give me that I need Flash, since I spent months
of my life working on Gnash for OpenBSD just so you
Deanna Phillips writes:
; Do something about it
; Use another OS
; Complain
Which are you doing?
None of the above. I ignore flash. My comment was only to point out
that gnash is not the best example to show why Linux emulation isn't
needed. Oh, I ignore Linux emulation, too.
Jacob Meuser wrote:
the current audio system actually supports a wider variety of audio devices.
Sorry for the non-technically-based question but, couldn't OpenBSD
contribute its development to audio drivers to OSS so all operating
systems using it could benefit? And then OpenBSD could support
Andris wrote:
Jacob Meuser wrote:
the current audio system actually supports a wider variety of audio devices.
Sorry for the non-technically-based question but, couldn't OpenBSD
contribute its development to audio drivers to OSS so all operating
systems using it could benefit? And then OpenBSD
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 05:54:58PM -0300, Andr?s wrote:
Jacob Meuser wrote:
the current audio system actually supports a wider variety of audio devices.
Sorry for the non-technically-based question but, couldn't OpenBSD
contribute its development to audio drivers to OSS so all operating
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 05:14:18PM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Andr?s wrote:
Jacob Meuser wrote:
the current audio system actually supports a wider variety of audio
devices.
Sorry for the non-technically-based question but, couldn't OpenBSD
contribute its development to audio drivers
There is also the question of ALSA compatibility layer which is in my
understanding slowly incorporated into OSS. Is it really important to have
ALSA compatibility layer? Can somebody give me an example of the software
which requires ALSA (please exclude Skype although there is OSS version)
I just saw that OSS v4.0 has been released under a 2-clause BSD license. [1]
I haven't seen it mentioned on the list yet and I know there's been a lot
of audio related development going on in -current so I just thought I'd
mention it for anyone who might be interested. Their website hasn't been
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:47:11PM -0800, Bryan Linton wrote:
I just saw that OSS v4.0 has been released under a 2-clause BSD license. [1]
I haven't seen it mentioned on the list yet and I know there's been a lot
of audio related development going on in -current so I just thought I'd
Awesome, It's great that they decided to release the code under a 2 clause BSD
licence... :-)
But I don't the the OpenBSD project should rip out it's entire current
framework and start using this package..
Still, It could serve as an excellent research... for additional drivers,
19 matches
Mail list logo