Hi all,
How can I log rdr rules in PF? I've seen my question appear in the
archieves, but I haven't seen an anwser. These are my rules:
rdr pass inet proto tcp from spamd to any \
port smtp - 127.0.0.1 port 8025
rdr pass inet proto tcp from !spamd-white to any \
port smtp - 127.0.0.1 port
Hi,
which OpenBSD version do you use?
man pf.conf says;
rdr-rule = [ no ] rdr [ pass [ log [ ( logopts ) ] ] ]
[ on ifspec ] [ af ]
[ protospec ] hosts [ tag string ] [ tagged string ]
[ - ( redirhost | { redirhost-list } )
Huzeyfe Onal schreef:
Hi,
which OpenBSD version do you use?
man pf.conf says;
rdr-rule = [ no ] rdr [ pass [ log [ ( logopts ) ] ] ]
[ on ifspec ] [ af ]
[ protospec ] hosts [ tag string ] [ tagged string ]
[ - ( redirhost
On 2006/04/18 22:02, Jasper Bal wrote:
Thanks for your reply. Im using OpenBSD 3.6
my man pf.conf says:
rdr-rule = [ no ] rdr [ pass ] [ on ifspec ] [ af ]
Drop the 'pass' from the rdr, and add explicit pass rules.
I guess this anwsers my question. Allthough logging would have helped
Regarding running 3.6:
I guess this anwsers my question. Allthough logging would have helped me
today, I don't consider it worthy of upgrading. My servers are 400km away...
If I publically gave all of you 10 reasons why you should not run code
that old, would you upgrade?
Theo de Raadt schreef:
Regarding running 3.6:
I guess this anwsers my question. Allthough logging would have helped me
today, I don't consider it worthy of upgrading. My servers are 400km away...
If I publically gave all of you 10 reasons why you should not run code
that old, would
Jasper Bal wrote:
Theo de Raadt schreef:
Regarding running 3.6:
I guess this anwsers my question. Allthough logging would have helped
me today, I don't consider it worthy of upgrading. My servers are
400km away...
If I publically gave all of you 10 reasons why you should not run
[OpenBSD-3.6]
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 02:34:00PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
If I publically gave all of you 10 reasons why you should not run code
that old, would you upgrade?
Looking at errata*.html, 13 reasons would be closer to reality ;-)
Ciao,
Kili
Theo de Raadt wrote:
Regarding running 3.6:
I guess this anwsers my question. Allthough logging would have helped me
today, I don't consider it worthy of upgrading. My servers are 400km away...
If I publically gave all of you 10 reasons why you should not run code
that old, would you
9 matches
Mail list logo