On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 2:38 PM Stuart Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 2024-04-08, Ioan Samarul wrote:
> > Hello to you all!
> >
> > I upgraded without problem to 7.5, everything went smooth as always,
> > except when I tried to upgrade the packages.
> >
> >
On 2024-04-08, Ioan Samarul wrote:
> Hello to you all!
>
> I upgraded without problem to 7.5, everything went smooth as always,
> except when I tried to upgrade the packages.
>
> This are the errors of `doas pkg_add -uV` (there is no version of
> firefox installed, if that
Hello to you all!
I upgraded without problem to 7.5, everything went smooth as always,
except when I tried to upgrade the packages.
This are the errors of `doas pkg_add -uV` (there is no version of
firefox installed, if that helps)
No pkgname in packing-list for .libs1-firefox-esr-91.13.0
Got it, thanks. But I didn't realize you have to run
'pkg_add -u -D snap' to upgrade all packages
after you upgrade with 'sysupgrade -s'.
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 6:40 PM Thomas Frohwein wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 02:27:36PM +0500, ofthecentury wrote:
> > I had a similar probl
On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 02:27:36PM +0500, ofthecentury wrote:
> I had a similar problem this week, for amd64.
> The 'packages/amd64' folder on the OpenBSD
> mirrors for 7.5 snapshot is also empty. So I
> just manually set PKG_PATH to 7.4 packages
> folder for the time being.
T
Try -D snap
Cheers
Sent from my iPhone
> On 9 Mar 2024, at 6:31 pm, ofthecentury wrote:
>
> I had a similar problem this week, for amd64.
> The 'packages/amd64' folder on the OpenBSD
> mirrors for 7.5 snapshot is also empty. So I
> just manually set PKG_PATH to 7.4
Peter Hessler writes:
> Yes, we are at a stage of development where snapshots look similar to a
> -release. (Note, these snapshots are not actually the release)
>
> For now, you want to run pkg_add with -Dsnap, so "pkg_add -Dsnap -u" or
> "pkg_add -Dsnap colorls".
That worked, thank you!
And
't find a
:directory https://ftp.hostserver.de/pub/OpenBSD/7.5/packages/aarch64/. I
:have checked several mirrors at https://www.openbsd.org/ftp.html and
:they indeed don't have any packages under 7.5.
:
:How do I fix this?
:
--
"Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern
tec
cgi?action=article;sid=20240301064504:
For upgrades to work correctly, you will need to run
sysupgrade(8) with the -s flag and upgrade your installed
packages by running pkg_add(1) with -D snap in addition to your
usual options
Alexis.
I had a similar problem this week, for amd64.
The 'packages/amd64' folder on the OpenBSD
mirrors for 7.5 snapshot is also empty. So I
just manually set PKG_PATH to 7.4 packages
folder for the time being.
On Sat, Mar 9, 2024 at 2:15 PM Dmitry Matveyev wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was runnin
SD/7.5/packages/aarch64/. I
have checked several mirrors at https://www.openbsd.org/ftp.html and
they indeed don't have any packages under 7.5.
How do I fix this?
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 08:29:30PM +0200, Mark said:
So, any clue?
Seems fine now, at least for whichever node the CDN returned for me.
bakeneko@20:02:19 ~ >curl -s
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.4/packages-stable/ | grep amd64
amd64/
So, any clue?
15 Ocak 2024 Pazartesi tarihinde K R yazdı:
> Hi,
>
> It seems packages-stable from cdn.openbsd.org haven't been
> updated since Dec, 25th:
>
> $ curl -s https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.4/packages-stable/ | grep
> amd64
> amd64/ 25-Dec-2023 06:06
&
Hi,
It seems packages-stable from cdn.openbsd.org haven't been
updated since Dec, 25th:
$ curl -s https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.4/packages-stable/ | grep amd64
amd64/ 25-Dec-2023 06:06
ftp.openbsd.org seems fine, though:
$ curl -s https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.4/packages-stable
Thanks Nick, after your answer I purged again
the files and I'm patiently waiting to see popping
the *ffs chops* again to confirm the problem.
I also launched a "grep -R" on /etc without luck.
== Daniele Bonini
Nick Holland wrote:
> On 11/16/23 18:12, Daniele B. wrote:
>
> > in /var:
> >
On 11/16/23 18:12, Daniele B. wrote:
Just found out that in my system persist the following stuff:
in /etc/passwd:
user _nagios
I don't really think you want users deleted when you uninstall a
package. Things may be invisibly (to the package manager) be
connected to that user.
in /var:
.
There is no cron job nor rc service present apparently for Nagios.
Any explanation for this happening and any help to clean away all
properly?
== Daniele Bonini
"Daniele B." wrote:
> Just found these orphan packages:
>
> [..]
>
> monitoring-plugins-2.3.3p0
> monitoring-plugins-mysql-2.3.3
Hello,
Just found these orphan packages:
fcitx-table-extra-5.0.9p0
monitoring-plugins-2.3.3p0
monitoring-plugins-mysql-2.3.3
all not uninstalled both by uninstalling their parent package
and by a 'pkg_delete -a'.
== Daniele Bonini
Thanks for the explanation!
> the -stable build
machines are now on 7.4 so they can't be re-created
I believe I have a more recent backup than you restored, at least for some
of the packages. Would the project be interested in those?
-Bryce
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 03:21 Stuart Henderson
wr
On 2023-10-27, Bryce Chidester wrote:
> Hey all,
> Can anyone confirm that curl-8.4.0.tgz was yanked from the
> 7.3/packages-stable/amd64?
> I'm certain it was there at some point because I have it installed on
> some of my 7.3 systems. But it's not there now. I've checked both
&g
Hey all,
Can anyone confirm that curl-8.4.0.tgz was yanked from the
7.3/packages-stable/amd64?
I'm certain it was there at some point because I have it installed on
some of my 7.3 systems. But it's not there now. I've checked both
cdn.openbsd.org and ftp.openbsd.org, as well as some other mirrors
Stephan Somogyi:
> aarch64 packages-stable has historically been available; for 7.4 it's
> populated for only for amd64, i386, and sparc64 on cdn.openbsd.org and
> assorted mirrors.
>
> Is there an ETA for 7.4 aarch64 packages-stable?
Uh, right. They were delayed becau
aarch64 packages-stable has historically been available; for 7.4 it's
populated for only for amd64, i386, and sparc64 on cdn.openbsd.org and
assorted mirrors.
Is there an ETA for 7.4 aarch64 packages-stable?
Thanks.
On 09-27-23 19:12:34, Mikhail wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 09:10:22AM -0700, Julian Gindi wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > As of yesterday, I am no longer able to install any packages using
> > "pkg_add". I am greated with the following error (using tree as an
Try "pkg_add -D snap -u".
Best,
g
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 09:10:22AM -0700, Julian Gindi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As of yesterday, I am no longer able to install any packages using
> "pkg_add". I am greated with the following error (using tree as an
> example. I am not able to get any packages to install):
Hello,
As of yesterday, I am no longer able to install any packages using
"pkg_add". I am greated with the following error (using tree as an
example. I am not able to get any packages to install):
> $ doas pkg_add -u tree
> Can't find tree
> Problem finding tree
> https
Hi,
On 8/14/2023 7:21 PM, Karel Lucas wrote:
Hi all,
Entered on a fresh install of openBSD : pkg_add bash. I got the
following error: ftp: ftp.nluug.nl/pub/OpenBSD: no address associated
with name.
Does your Internet access (including DNS resolution) work correctly?
Did you try another
Hi all,
Entered on a fresh install of openBSD : pkg_add bash. I got the
following error: ftp: ftp.nluug.nl/pub/OpenBSD: no address associated
with name. Not too long ago I did this on another machine and it worked.
The correct site is listed in /etc/installurl:
On Wed, 3 May 2023 10:37:07 - (UTC)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023-05-03, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> > Hello Everybody,
> >
> > $ curl
> > https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/|grep
> > '^harfbuzz'
> > [No output]
> &
On 2023-05-03, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
>
> $ curl
> https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/|grep
> '^harfbuzz'
> [No output]
>
> and as we all know it is a dependency for nearly everything
> running on a typical workstation.
Hello Everybody,
$ curl
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/|grep
'^harfbuzz'
[No output]
and as we all know it is a dependency for nearly everything
running on a typical workstation.
What gives?
--
With best regards,
Gregory Edigarov
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:22:09 +0100, u...@mailo.com wrote:
> Did snapshot sysupgrade
>
> On reboot in tty0:
> syspatch: Error retrieving https://mirror.ihost.md/pub/OpenBSD/7.3/packages/a
> md64/SHA256.sig: 404 not found
>
> Issuing pkg_add -u:
> https://mirror.ihost.md/
Did snapshot sysupgrade
On reboot in tty0:
syspatch: Error retrieving
https://mirror.ihost.md/pub/OpenBSD/7.3/packages/amd64/SHA256.sig: 404 not found
Issuing pkg_add -u:
https://mirror.ihost.md/pub/OpenBSD/7.3/packages/amd64/: no such dir
I see other mirrors
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 12:11:08PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022-11-29, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:31:30AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> On 2022-11-22, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> >> > Hello
> >> >
> >>
On 2022-11-29, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:31:30AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2022-11-22, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
>> > Hello
>> >
>> > I note the updated package in snapshots/packages, and wonder
>> &g
On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:31:23 +0100, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:31:30AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2022-11-22, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > I note the updated package in snapshots/packages, and wonder
> &g
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:31:30AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022-11-22, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I note the updated package in snapshots/packages, and wonder
> > if the "fixes of important obfusction bugs" that are in
> >
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:31:30AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022-11-22, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I note the updated package in snapshots/packages, and wonder
> > if the "fixes of important obfusction bugs" that are in
> >
On 2022-11-22, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> Hello
>
> I note the updated package in snapshots/packages, and wonder
> if the "fixes of important obfusction bugs" that are in
> obfs4proxy 0.0.14 will also appear in 7.2/packages?
I've just applied it to -stable so it should
Hello
I note the updated package in snapshots/packages, and wonder
if the "fixes of important obfusction bugs" that are in
obfs4proxy 0.0.14 will also appear in 7.2/packages?
Best regards
--
/ Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
On 2022-07-23, not jacinda ardern wrote:
> Is there a way to see the build status of the different architectures
> for snapshot packages, eg via a continuous integration pipeline or
> somesuch
No
> I noticed that the current snapshots seem to have moved to libz-7.0 in
> th
Ricky Cintron wrote:
> Before upgrading my -current system Saturday evening (Jan. 22), I noticed that
> the snapshot packages for amd64 were partially synced. The first half are from
> the 21st, while the second half are from the 20th. I checked the Fastly cdn,
> the
>
work you're suggesting.
>
> Here's the error I'm getting while attempting to install qutebrowser and a
> number of other packages:
>
> Can't install libsoup2.72.0 because of libraries library sqlite3.37.12 not
> found
Either you have a mismatch of versions (e.g. running -current
text files in the installation directories
* The FAQ: https://www.openbsd.org/faq/index.html. Check out the
«Installing Packages»
(https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PkgInstall)
* Manpages (available online in https://man.openbsd.org), starting with
afterboot(8)
* Mailing list archive in https://marc.info/
attempting to install qutebrowser and a
number of other packages:
Can't install libsoup2.72.0 because of libraries library sqlite3.37.12 not
found
I believe there's some sort of symlinking I need to do to point to the
right sqlite3 library, but I have no clue where the link needs to go and
what it need
On 2021-05-14, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:47:11PM +, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
>> After upgrading 6.8->6.9 (stable, not current) using sysupgrade, I am
>> finding it not possible to install packages via pkg_add
>>
>> When I try to ins
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:47:11PM +, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
> After upgrading 6.8->6.9 (stable, not current) using sysupgrade, I am
> finding it not possible to install packages via pkg_add
>
> When I try to install something, I get a series of errors like " dep
On Thu, 13 May 2021 22:47:11 +
tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
> I am assuming I need to be installing new packages with `pkg_add -U` to
> update the dependencies as needed. However, the manpage suggests this is
> not desirable.
Maybe try `pkg_add -u` (lowercase 'u' not upperca
tps://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD>.
Then I tried `pkg_add -u` to upgrade my packages and although for most of
them everything went smooth I can't get escape this errors:
Can't install poppler-qt5-21.03.0 because of libraries
|library execinfo.2.0 not found
| not found anywhere
|library graphit
After upgrading 6.8->6.9 (stable, not current) using sysupgrade, I am
finding it not possible to install packages via pkg_add
When I try to install something, I get a series of errors like "dependency library name>: bad major" or ": minor is
too small"
I am assumi
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:50:35PM -0500, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:47:11PM +, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
> > After upgrading 6.8->6.9 (stable, not current) using sysupgrade, I am
> > finding it not possible to install packages via pkg_add
&
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:47:11PM +, tetrahe...@danwin1210.me wrote:
> After upgrading 6.8->6.9 (stable, not current) using sysupgrade, I am
> finding it not possible to install packages via pkg_add
>
> When I try to install something, I get a series of errors like " dep
Babes,
I want to install fna and fna3d to be able to play terraria with fnaify
but the packages seem to be nonexistant on 6.8-release, and they used
to be available. I can't use -Dsnap because the new packages depend on
a new version of sdl2, which depends on a new version of xenocara which
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 02:49:19AM +, jpegb...@dismail.de wrote:
...
> I want to install fna and fna3d to be able to play terraria with fnaify
> but the packages seem to be nonexistant on 6.8-release, and they used
> to be available. I can't use -Dsnap because the new packag
just following up on myself for anyone who might make the same mistake...
turns out i had not read-recently or forgotten how to "follow -current"
correctly...
https://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html
in particular, i had downloaded a snapshot and dd'ed onto a usb-stick but
chosen (I)nstall
when
symptom: did a "pkg_add wget" on a recent-snapshot fails with bad-major
c++ errors... am i being impatient also ?
i remember reading (07-08 jan) that the pkg_add compiles were taking awhile
to grind thru... it is also quite-possible that i have hit a gap between
the snapshot i downloaded and
> While at it, link /bin/ls to /bin/rm
An Apple fanboy trying to look 1337 in a linux style on an OpenBSD mailing list.
Impressive not.
On Jan 07 21:30, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> A new build is running now and will take another 24h to complete
> if all goes well.
Thanks for the ETA. You build ports faster than I can. I appreciate
your service.
On Jan 07 16:40:37, ch...@nmedia.net wrote:
> For those trying to use the latest snap and the latest ports, try link
> libc++.so.4.0 to libc++.so.5.0 and libc++abi.so.2.1 to libc++abi.so.3.0
> for now. Frankenstein, indeed. You'll feel dirty just doing it.
While at it, link /bin/ls to /bin/rm
re a problem with the current packages folder
| > from the mirrors?
|
| No, the amd64 package builds have been slightly delayed.
A good reminder that you are building these package snaps very often,
thanks to you (and all the other pkg builders and Theo and other base
snap builders) for providing us with
On 2021-01-07, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Maybe I should have asked ports to run with the build first, so that
> base and packages would be aligned.
We (package builders) don't really do that - and in the majority of
cases it's not much of a problem anyway, it normally only affects people
tha
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 05:44:05PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>
> > Mihai Popescu [mih...@gmail.com] wrote:
> > > I was in the same situation, impatient to have a 2021 snapshot.
> > >
> > > Warning: I am not sure you will not finish with a Frankenstein system. I
> > >
Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Mihai Popescu [mih...@gmail.com] wrote:
> > I was in the same situation, impatient to have a 2021 snapshot.
> >
> > Warning: I am not sure you will not finish with a Frankenstein system. I am
> > not so good with compiler-linker stuff.
>
> For those trying to use the
Mihai Popescu [mih...@gmail.com] wrote:
> I was in the same situation, impatient to have a 2021 snapshot.
>
> Warning: I am not sure you will not finish with a Frankenstein system. I am
> not so good with compiler-linker stuff.
For those trying to use the latest snap and the latest ports, try
I was in the same situation, impatient to have a 2021 snapshot.
Dirty hint: the .hk mirror still has the base part from 2020! But try it as
a last option, the folks there are not so bandwidth fortunate. After
installing the base, please switch /etc/installurl to something more
suitable as
On 07/01/2021 1:30 p.m., Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Steve Williams:
I hesitate to send this because perhaps I'm just too impatient, but then
again, perhaps not. This is not critical/time sensitive.
I just thought I'd check if there a problem with the current packages folder
from the mirrors
Steve Williams:
> I hesitate to send this because perhaps I'm just too impatient, but then
> again, perhaps not. This is not critical/time sensitive.
>
> I just thought I'd check if there a problem with the current packages folder
> from the mirrors?
No, the amd64 package b
they are trying to figure out the
> > fallout from the switch to LLVM 11 as system compiler. This is why the
> > packages are being delayed. Please wait a while till it is sorted out.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 10:56 AM Steve Williams
> > wrote:
Impatient it is :D
Thanks for the update!
Cheers,
Steve W.
On 07/01/2021 10:56 a.m., Patrick Wildt wrote:
I committed an update to libunwind which made a major bump necessary.
Maybe I should have asked ports to run with the build first, so that
base and packages would be aligned. Too late
> Like naddy@ mentioned on ports@ they are trying to figure out the
> > fallout from the switch to LLVM 11 as system compiler. This is why the
> > packages are being delayed. Please wait a while till it is sorted out.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > On Thu, Ja
are not harmed in anyway, apart from the libunwind update.
Am Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:56:07AM -0600 schrieb Amit Kulkarni:
> Like naddy@ mentioned on ports@ they are trying to figure out the
> fallout from the switch to LLVM 11 as system compiler. This is why the
> packages are being delaye
Like naddy@ mentioned on ports@ they are trying to figure out the
fallout from the switch to LLVM 11 as system compiler. This is why the
packages are being delayed. Please wait a while till it is sorted out.
thanks
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 10:56 AM Steve Williams
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
I committed an update to libunwind which made a major bump necessary.
Maybe I should have asked ports to run with the build first, so that
base and packages would be aligned. Too late for that now. Time will
fix it though.
Am Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 09:54:39AM -0700 schrieb Steve Williams:
>
Hi,
I hesitate to send this because perhaps I'm just too impatient, but then
again, perhaps not. This is not critical/time sensitive.
I just thought I'd check if there a problem with the current packages
folder from the mirrors?
I am trying to update my development system (to resume work
Sonic wrote:
> Fresh install of -current and I'm getting these errors when running pkg_add:
>
> library pcap.8.4 not found
> /usr/lib/libpcap.so.9.0 (system): bad major
> library c++.4.0 not found
> /usr/lib/libc++.so.5.0 (system): bad major
> library c++abi.2.1 not found
>
On 2020-08-04, Sonic wrote:
> Is there a workaround? Is it a matter of timing - waiting for the
> packages to be built around the newer libraries? Or were the older
> library versions left off mistakenly?
scp the old libraries, or wait for new packages that don't need them.
This usuall
Update the installed packages first pkg_add -Uu
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 13:00, Sonic wrote:
> Fresh install of -current and I'm getting these errors when running pkg_add:
>
> library pcap.8.4 not found
> /usr/lib/libpcap.so.9.0 (system): bad major
>
> On Aug 4, 2020, at 4:33 PM, Sonic wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:24 PM wrote:
>> Update the installed packages first pkg_add -Uu
>
> It's a fresh install based on -current just downloaded. First attempt
> at installing packages, so no packages to upgrad
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:24 PM wrote:
> Update the installed packages first pkg_add -Uu
It's a fresh install based on -current just downloaded. First attempt
at installing packages, so no packages to upgrade.
Sonic wrote:
> Is there a workaround? Is it a matter of timing - waiting for the
> packages to be built around the newer libraries? Or were the older
> library versions left off mistakenly?
you must be this tall to use -current and snapshots, becuase they
are a moving target
if yo
Is there a workaround? Is it a matter of timing - waiting for the
packages to be built around the newer libraries? Or were the older
library versions left off mistakenly?
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:20 PM Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> this is openbsd-current. things change. get used to it, or
this is openbsd-current. things change. get used to it, or stick to
releases.
Sonic wrote:
> On a slightly older install I have the missing libraries (and the newer ones):
> /usr/lib/libc++.so.4.0
> /usr/lib/libc++.so.5.0
> /usr/lib/libc++abi.so.2.1
> /usr/lib/libc++abi.so.3.0
>
On a slightly older install I have the missing libraries (and the newer ones):
/usr/lib/libc++.so.4.0
/usr/lib/libc++.so.5.0
/usr/lib/libc++abi.so.2.1
/usr/lib/libc++abi.so.3.0
/usr/lib/libpcap.so.8.4
/usr/lib/libpcap.so.9.0
On this most recent install only the newer libraries exist:
Fresh install of -current and I'm getting these errors when running pkg_add:
library pcap.8.4 not found
/usr/lib/libpcap.so.9.0 (system): bad major
library c++.4.0 not found
/usr/lib/libc++.so.5.0 (system): bad major
library c++abi.2.1 not found
/usr/lib/libc++abi.so.3.0 (system): bad major
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 11:31, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2020-06-08, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> > I probably didn't make myself clear and I apologize. I'd like to have
> > a list of files for just one package, and only if that package has
> > been installed. If not installed, it should tell me
t; >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > "pkg_info -L PACKAGE-NAME"
> > > >
> > > > will give me a list of all the files within each package, regardless
> > > > of whether the package is installed or not.
> > > >
>
Hello Ottavio,
pkg_info -m
will show you all the packages, which you have installed,
without their dependencies.
pkg_info -a
will show you all the packages, including their dependecies.
Regards,
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: owner-m...@openbsd.org Im Auftrag von Ottavio
On 2020-06-08, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> I probably didn't make myself clear and I apologize. I'd like to have
> a list of files for just one package, and only if that package has
> been installed. If not installed, it should tell me it hasn't been
> installed or just provide no output, a bit like
t; of whether the package is installed or not.
> >
> > How can I restrict the output to only installed packages, making it
> > fail if the package is not installed?
> >
> > I could do:
> >
> > "pkg_info -f PACKAGE-NAME "
> >
> > but that
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 at 21:11, Ottavio Caruso
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> "pkg_info -L PACKAGE-NAME"
>
> will give me a list of all the files within each package, regardless
> of whether the package is installed or not.
>
> How can I restrict the output to only
Hi,
"pkg_info -L PACKAGE-NAME"
will give me a list of all the files within each package, regardless
of whether the package is installed or not.
How can I restrict the output to only installed packages, making it
fail if the package is not installed?
I could do:
"pkg_info
ME"
> > >
> > > will give me a list of all the files within each package, regardless
> > > of whether the package is installed or not.
> > >
> > > How can I restrict the output to only installed packages, making it
> > > fail if the package is
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020 21:11:57 +0100, Ottavio Caruso
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "pkg_info -L PACKAGE-NAME"
>
> will give me a list of all the files within each package, regardless
> of whether the package is installed or not.
>
> How can I restrict the output to only in
Though according to:
https://www.andrewhoefling.com/Blog/Post/net-5-and-the-future-of-net-framework-and-net-core
>.NET 5 and .NET Standard
>What is the life of .NET Standard and will it be going away?
>.NET Standard is not going anywhere as far as I understand and will be very
>important to
Another question, are we going to see DotNet Core in OpenBSD?
Something like:
https://data.gpo.zugaina.org/lanodanOverlay/dev-dotnet/dotnetcore-sdk/dotnetcore-sdk-3.0.100.ebuild
For example if we look at mono package on Gentoo:
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/dev-lang/mono
We will see there are missing ports for alpha, hppa, ia64 and sparc, actually I
might be interested only in sparc among them.
On the other hand are there any similar limitations for the:
https
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:31:09PM +, Martin wrote:
> I need to change system daemon (smptd) start order during system boot to have
> it connected to a database which started from package scripts
> /etc/rc.conf.local.
>
> Now /etc/rc.conf is untouched, database runs from /etc/rc.conf.local
I need to change system daemon (smptd) start order during system boot to have
it connected to a database which started from package scripts
/etc/rc.conf.local.
Now /etc/rc.conf is untouched, database runs from /etc/rc.conf.local
pkg_scripts="postgresql"
smtpd starts first from rc.conf and crash
Hello!
I wanted to mention that
https://ftp.hostserver.de/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/aarch64/
is showing packages as of 2020-03-14 (3/14). But
https://ftp.OpenBSD.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/aarch64/
is at 2020-04-02 (04/02).
Regarding snapshots the lag is only a single day
1 - 100 of 1150 matches
Mail list logo
