Re: Etnernal & infernal browser woes

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 05:28:33PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 11:21:25PM +0900, Bryan Linton wrote: > > On 2017-04-29 15:48:51, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > > > > > Chris Bennett wrote on Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 07:10:05AM -0500: > > > > > >> Firefox

Re: OpenBSD/octeon on EdgeRouter PoE - my experience

I have been running an EdgeRouter Lite, using all three ports, for about a year, rock solid! Cheers Adam On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Daniel Gracia wrote: > I'd bet there are quite more important issues related to the Octean > platform than the switch issue, so I won't

Playstations and PF de-fragmentation

I find that to prevent connection timeouts on playstations, the following is required. Hopefully they will fix their packet AND connection handling one day. match from ! $ps3 scrub(tcp reassembly) match from $ps3 scrub(without tcp reassembly)

Re: Etnernal & infernal browser woes

Just wanted to mention the firefox extension umatrix. I find it much better than noscript for controlling page speed. That said I only *notice* slowness compared to like xombrero on older machines.

Re: iwm0 problems

> I also have this issue with AC 3160. What i did as a workaround was to switch > iwm to 802.11g using > ifconfig iwm0 media autoselect mode 11g Excellent! That got my wireless interface working without error messages. As far as I haven’t had a single firmware error in two hours. I haven’t

Re: iwm0 problems

thanks! I think it partially solved my problem. It doesn't show the dmesg any more and i think my wifi. Although my system just freeze for a couple of seconds. I dont know if wifi cause this. I get 8.77Mbps download 0.78Mbps upload 171ms ping which is better than 4.81Mbps download 0.58Mbps

Re: iwm0 problems

thanks! I think it partially solved my problem. It doesn't show the dmesg message any more. I get 8.77Mbps download 0.78Mbps upload 171ms ping which is better than 4.81Mbps download 0.58Mbps upload 240 ms ping i was getting before. Still a bit slower compared to 10.79Mbps download 0.80Mpbs upload

Re: Help with authpf(8)

On 2017-04-30, Michael Graves wrote: > So my question, is there a way to setup authenticate users against > authpf(8) without needing their accounts local or in YP? No. But depending on your environment, maybe it would work to periodically pull from ldap and generate

Re: iwm0 problems

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 12:37:20PM -0400, Steve Throckmorton wrote: > I recently installed -current on a Dell laptop my mother decided she didn’t > want. I have the same problems with iwm0 on this machine (with its AC 3160 > wireless device) as were reported for the 3165. > > The dmesg I’m

Re: OpenBSD/octeon on EdgeRouter PoE - my experience

I'd bet there are quite more important issues related to the Octean platform than the switch issue, so I won't expect any progress soon. About the Lite, you'd get your three working ports. Regards! 2017-04-29 23:34 GMT+02:00 Doggie : > W dniu 2017-04-25 o 18:47, Daniel

does iked support client-mode EAP MSCHAP-V2?

I'm a little unclear from reading through the docs - does iked currently support authentication via MSCHAP-V2 as a roadwarrior (client-mode)? This would be for use with an external VPN provider, which typically provide you with a username/password combination to use. Thanks!

Re: Etnernal & infernal browser woes

> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:53:24 +0200 > "Jens A. Griepentrog" wrote: > ... > I have been using OpenBSD for six years on my desktop > without any problems. Everything works fine on my > ASUS P7F-M WS mainboard including its audio daughterboard; > also graphics hardware

Help with authpf(8)

Hello I am in the process of setting up the authpf(8) service on OpenBSD 6.1. I would like to have the users authenticate using radius. I have setup the login.conf (below) appropriately to achieve this, however I find that when I try to login with a user that is not on the system, the

Re: 80 users

Apologies, just realised I should make a quick correction. When I said "The maxusers value gets compiled into the param.o object", I meant that values which are calculated from maxusers are compiled into the object file. MAXUSERS is a macro, and not itself placed into the object file. On

Re: pledge for sockets

On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 00:29:01 +1000 wrote: ... > Even with "block reset all" in PF rules, nc does this. > > It would be nice if the "reset" keyword tells the kernel to return > EACCES when bind(2) is called on a port blocked by PF rules for a > particular user. Mistake