Marcos Laufer wrote:
You didn't read it and you didn't pay attention to
statement in bold
either. I could tell you what to do to fix it, but then you
wouldn't
learn from it. If it wasn't explain there, I would be happy to tell
you, but it is there and pretty clear as well.
Daft?
Nobody here defended that (the GPL)?
Are you tweedledee or tweedledum?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 4:33 AM
To: Tony Abernethy
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; misc@openbsd.org
No, according to your last email copncerning the introduction to the GPL,
the purpose is to make people daft and unsorted.
Are you Tweedledee or Tweedledum?
Please sort yourself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rui Miguel Silva
I stopped and thought.
You are confused.
All your issues are confused.
My insane opinion is much more valid than yours.
Are you Tweedledee or Tweedledum?
Do you even know who you are?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rui Miguel Silva
Actually I do get the point that you are not talking about.
In my point of view, the GPL has NOT kept you from being a social failure.
You are what you see --- I sincerely hope not.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rui Miguel Silva
Good luck doing so without any source code.
Teehee Teehee. No luck required.
It does however take a wee bit of skill and competence.
Actually, for exacting work, the source is a liability.
The source tends to make assorted bugs vanish.
You seem uneducated about how powerless someone is without
Damien Miller wrote:
To: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
Cc: J.C. Roberts; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: The Atheros story in much fewer words
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
You seem uneducated about how powerless someone is without
the freedom
to change a program
as if that would make all past wrong
arguments become true.
Your subjunctive is derailed.
Tweedledee is getting tweedledummer and dummer
-
From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 8:48 AM
To: Tony Abernethy
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: The Atheros story in much fewer words
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 07:25:29AM -0500, Tony Abernethy wrote:
Damien Miller wrote:
To: Rui
Most people think it's magic, and most don't understand that
I've always had the impression that OpenBSD is NOT most people
They seem to be people who think it's actually worthwhile knowing what they
are talking about.
Seems like most people on this list think that you are incredibly dense and
Dunno about anyone else, but that seems like some kind of poetic justice.
Preserving the pseudo-integrity of garbage seems like it should be very low
on the list of priorities.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David Given
Sent:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24.09-13:48, Darren Spruell wrote:
[ ... ]
Oh, that sounds like a recipe for success.
- Run _arbitrary_ _binary_ application on system. Intend to
use policy
wrapper to restrict to allowed operations.
exactly, if the application cannot run within the
Calomel wrote:
If you really want to check the drive and verify it has
errors then check
out the binary called badblocks. I do not believe OpenBSD has
badblocks but
you can use the cd distro system rescue cd and run
badblocks from there
without removing the drive from the current
Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez wrote:
Hi,
I just download the last snapshots available on ftp.openbsd.org.
note Because my new and shiny CDs not arrive yet to Costa
Rica and i
can't wait to install 4.2 /note. I was reading the faq on
the OpenBSD web:
-Current is where active development
Robert C Wittig wrote:
Siju George wrote:
I thought by running an amd64 kernel will get me twice the
speed than
an i386 on an amd64 machine since one is 64 bit processing and the
other is just 32 bit :-(
64 bit processors (combined with 64 bit capable operating
systems) have
Siju George wrote:
snip
so you think a 20 ton truck is twice as fast as a 10 ton truck?
O.K I get it :-)
So when does changing from 32 bit to a 64-bit processor actually help?
Quoting Paul de Weerd,
In short: There is no short answer. It depends on what you're doing.
( Not to mention how you
L. V. Lammert wrote:
gibberish
only an idiot would think that separatey
physical machines would NOT increase security
Many IBM PCs vs IBM mainframe
Many mailboxes vs Fort Knox.
Many avenues of attack vs few.
People learn to count in kindergarden.
Jon Sjvstedt wrote:
Please dont kill me :) I'm really not experienced with this
kind of stuff.
Looks like you maybe cloned an 8GB disk to the 250GB disk
and are now running out of space on the cloned file system.
fdisk wd0 should give you the MS-DOS partitioning (what BIOS sees)
16383/16/63
Are you saying that instead of distinguishing between
foo and my foo,
the distinction should be between
everybody's foo and foo
for some spelling of everybody's
?
- --- Original Message --- -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 15 May 2005 14:43:00
On Mon, 16
Jason Beaudoin wrote:
snip
Use all the tricks you can for YOUR solution, including:
* lots of small partitions
What are the reasonings behind this?
Thanks for the awesome post!
I think it runs something like this
If there is a problem somewhere on the disk,
if it's all one big
Sebastian Rother wrote:
On Sun, 6 May 2007 11:12:54 -0700
Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/6/07, Sebastian Rother [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody,
I`ve a problem with one HDD wich has 3 empty Partitions at the
beginning. I wanted to remove those partitions
OpenBSD is free as in air.
We'll stick to our principles for reasons entirely
dissasociated from those problems, and noone will ever really
understand.
Because you can.
Because it's there.
Most mortals dare not even attempt.
Nikns Siankin wrote:
I see people keep repeating nonsense like this
instead of talking about topic.
At least he can read. And think.
Alexey Vatchenko wrote:
On 2008-01-18, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 06:24:16PM -0700, Clint Pachl wrote:
If you want security, get rid of X.
Even if it's OpenBSD's X? The one that you need should you need to
build any ports (including if you follow
bofh wrote:
I don't get what you're talking about. If you overwrite the file
(vulnerable sshd) with a new one, the file gets replaced.
All the hardlinks
would point to the new file.
Copying to a file can be done in two distinct ways
with different results for any other hard links to same
elpinguim wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 05:28:11PM +0100, Martin Schr?der wrote:
2008/2/1, elpinguim [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Configuring pf to not even respond to unallocated ip space also
helps. Search for Bogon filtering.
No. This just adds another way for things to go wrong. KISS.
Mayuresh Kathe
On Feb 17, 2008 5:50 PM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mayuresh Kathe wrote:
OpenBSD is an OS with amazing security and stability, but
it has too
few modern features.
H related?
thats exactly my point, our mindset has become that security
.
On Feb 19, 2008 9:46 AM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You just said that you are a dead goat???
Amazing --- and I've got a life.
Whats is it that you have?
What kind of a life does a dead goat have?
-Original Message-
From: Mayuresh Kathe [mailto:[EMAIL
disconnected from reality when you start thinking?
On Feb 19, 2008 9:53 AM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand English sentences.
What is this English-based sentences you speak of?
My logic may be flawed, but it seems it surpasses you
abilty to elucidate
the exact
from reality.
Please don't even try to think.
On Feb 19, 2008 11:59 AM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dead billy goat or dead nanny goat?
which are you?
-Original Message-
From: Mayuresh Kathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:26 AM
, 2008 11:59 AM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dead billy goat or dead nanny goat?
which are you?
-Original Message-
From: Mayuresh Kathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What is our ultimate
an email based altercation with me, do it
off-list.
About my true colours, forget it, you don't have enough vision or
intelligence to understand me.
On Feb 19, 2008 12:22 PM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may be an oaf, but it is with FULL REALIZATION THAT I AM
SENDING
, you are disconnected from reality.
Go get yourself a life, and more importantly, get yourself treated
from a psychiatrist.
On Feb 19, 2008 12:11 PM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which half?
You really ought to go back to kindergarden.
-Original Message-
From
19, 2008 12:38 PM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You claim you don't have enough vision or intelligence to
understand me.
and you offer (to the list included) no explanation.
I may lack the vision and intelli9gence, but why do you
insist that the rest
of the list also lacks
ultimate goal??
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:52:35AM -0600, Tony Abernethy wrote:
I may be an oaf, but it is with FULL REALIZATION THAT I AM
SENDING THIS TO
THE LIST
MY PURPOSE IN DOING SO IS TO PAINT YOU WITH SOMEHTING
RESEMBLING YOUR TRUE
COLORS.
Is it fair? Some day, someone other
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Zbigniew Baniewski
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:20 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: What is our ultimate goal??
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:12:46AM -0600, Tony Abernethy wrote:
Fair No.
It is like dead fish after 4 days
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:52:35AM -0600, Tony Abernethy wrote:
I may be an oaf, but it is with FULL REALIZATION THAT I AM
SENDING THIS TO
THE LIST
MY PURPOSE IN DOING SO IS TO PAINT YOU WITH SOMEHTING
RESEMBLING YOUR TRUE
COLORS.
Is it fair? Some
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:37:33AM -0600, Tony Abernethy wrote:
You mean that the proponents of threads are overyly emotional?
If the sides are calling each other with terms like idiot -
or something
similar - do you really find it as non-emotional?
How
Stuart Henderson
it's all a marketing scheme for the Apple laptop with soldered RAM...
Please, not when I'm drinking coffee.
Nick Holland wrote:
Sometimes the way to avoid one error opens the door to three
or four others.
That's why I lurk on this list.
Good advice regardless of context.
Thanks.
Perpetual motion machines?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Die Gestalt
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 6:16 AM
To: Otto Moerbeek
Cc: misc
Subject: Re: Singularity OS
I don't think it is relevant or even polite to question one's
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
Is it possible to participate in this mailing list without
being insulted
for asking a question, being called by names and so on?
Yes. Easily.
However, you do NOT get to set anyone's agenda,
not even your own.
The developers do this the way they want to.
They
Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
Pay attention: there is a feedback.
Seems like there has been a lot of feedback.
Assuming that you can read,
can you take your own advice?
Peter Fraser wrote:
I was very surprised, that when I was installing
a 3.9 system, that you can use an empty root password
I accidentally entered a 'return' when it asked for the
root password, so I entered a 'return again when
I was asked to repeat the password, thinking that
a empty
Joseph C. Bender wrote:
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 5/6/06, Henrik Borgh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ sudo fdisk wd0
Password:
Disk: wd0 geometry: 4864/255/63 [78140160 Sectors]
Offset: 0 Signature: 0xAA55
Starting Ending LBA Info:
#: idC H S -
Jacques wrote:
Florin Iamandi wrote:
Jacques dixit (2006-05-05, 12:58:02):
May we know, what kind of 'incident'?
Sounds like a security issue.
At this point nobody with a clue will take this or any of its
descendents seriously. Think.
Imagine I've just managed to crack the OpenBSD
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 5/6/06, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me, I'd take a closer look at that j OpenBSD partition.
It does NOT look like it corresponds to anything in the DOS partitions.
Whether or not you redo the disklabel from scratch,
the critical operation is writing
dave feustel wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 16:16, D. E. Evans wrote:
The question is, if I am not doing anything with those files,
then why is kio accessing them?
Why are you repeating your question when you've already been
answered?
OK I didn't get it the first time. What was
Theo de Raadt wrote:
I'm looking for some hints on evaluating load average.
You can't. It's a statement about job queue lengths, not about how
busy a machine is. And since different operating systems (and even
different versions) have made various tweaks to it over the years, it
is
Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 08:14:06PM -0400, Adam wrote:
On Tue, 09 May 2006 19:52:10 -0400 Dave Crawford
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or another viable solution.
There's no solution because there's no problem. OpenBSD
doesn't randomly
reorder interfaces for
Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
i have a single CSV file that is 2.5GB (!) unzipped which i need to either
partition into chunks or read from directly. trying to open it
with vi doesn't
work since 2.5GB 500MB, the size of the /var partition on this machine.
opening with vi gives a /var: write
SkyBlueshoes wrote:
I've just installed OpenBSD 3.8...my first ever *nix. I've got most up
and running, but I'm having problems recieving email. I followed the
guidelines on this page http://www.nomoa.com/bsd/mailServer.htm to the
letter. All the localhost tests work, but when I try to
Jacob Meuser wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:27:18PM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
On 20 May 2006, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:09:15AM +0300, Liviu Daia wrote:
I have a simpler question: is there any plan to make installing
xbase a
Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
I have used lynx for years as a file browser as well as web browser
(when I can) and it is routine for me to fix /etc/lynx.conf to show
me dotfiles.
Recently I need to inspect lots of text files and sometimes edit a few
so I set vi to be the system editor for lynx.
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 5/23/06, prad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 22 May 2006 17:54, you wrot
You can consider short-circuiting of Boolean evaluation
greedy, but it a
feature which may also save clock cycles if the right-most
sub-expressions
are costly to evaluate.
Marcin Wilk wrote:
Hi
I'm using OpenBSD 3.7 with default Apache with SSL over two
VirtualHosts witht he same IP.
Here is how it works in there:
NameVirtualHost *:80
NameVirtualHost *:443
Regardless of what you can put in any configuration,
Port 80, http 1.1+ (I think) allows you to
misiu wrote:
Hello all,
I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
thought give it a nother try.
Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and later
Adam wrote:
The question was about scalability.
I keep seeing that term. Is it supposed to mean something?
Methinks there is a problem with scalability if you cannot even
add two numbers together. (Well maybe with Lisp and infinite tapes)
Dijkstra had an analogy with comparing, as a means of
Adam wrote:
On Sun, 28 May 2006 13:58:39 -0500 Tony Abernethy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam wrote:
The question was about scalability.
I keep seeing that term. Is it supposed to mean something?
Yes, and retarded posts like this aren't needed thanks.
Then what precisely
Henning Brauer wrote:
OpenBSD scales very well an most tasks you'll find.
There are some exceptions tho. That unfortunately includes threads.
Out of curiosity, what happens when you run apache on SMP hardware
where the libraries are not thread safe? (or whatever it's called)
Adam uttered following nonsense.
Linux programs have nothing to do with anything,
That is a good characterization of SMP and scaling?
and your desire to make a big stupid thread of bullshit is quite annoying.
You are annoyed.
My desire is a small thread.
akonsu wrote:
in my understanding a proper implementation does not require any service
packs. in other words: if one implements something that later requires a
service pack, this is not a proper implementation.
Exactly.
(And I don't seem to hear a lot about keeping OpenBSD patched
Federico Giannici wrote:
I have just switched to a multiprocessing kernel (3.9-stable i386) with
a dual core Athlon 64.
I noticed that top command now have two CPUx rows, one for each CPU.
But iostat has only one cpu column.
Question 1: are the iostat's cpu values a mean of the values of
Eliah Kagan wrote:
On 6/6/06, Roger Neth Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even OpenBSDin my humble opinion, the safest operating system on the
planetis crackable, if you allow anyone to come and pound away at its
network interface.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1972281,00.asp
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 08:31:59PM +, Didier Wiroth wrote:
Hello,
My ntfs amd comaq diag. partition is not in the disklabel.
Unfortunately I don't know how to add correctly in the disklabel.
I've read the faq 14.16.1 but it only shows a modification.
Here
Travers Buda wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:10:13 -0700
Hank Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
There has been some discussion of late on this list about Hifn's
policy with respect to releasing documentation to the general
public. That discussion lead to a great deal of uninformed
Breen Ouellette wrote:
Darrin Chandler wrote:
Look, it's pretty obvious from early exchanges in this thread that these
issues have been discussed by the principal parties over a fairly long
period of time. How many brilliant insights have been added by this
thread? More important, has
Fred Crowson wrote:
Hi Misc,
I keep getting the following error, when trying to mount a 2GB Sony
Memory Stick Pro Duo (MSX-M2GN) in my Sony T7 digital camera:
nike:fred /home/fred sudo mount /mnt/t7
mount_msdos: /dev/sd1i on /mnt/t7: Inappropriate file type or format
Can anyone help me
Siju George wrote:
On 6/17/06, Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Han Boetes wrote:
I've been working for quite some time now on an alternative
package-manager for OpenBSD, and since things start working rather
fine now I think it's time to let you guys know.
this is about
Tobias Weisserth wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday, 17. June 2006 18:36, Deanna Phillips wrote:
...
As I see it, this is an example of working _against_ a project
instead of with and for it. A personal NIH syndrome, if you
will. It's not just some Linux thing he put together that also
works
Nick Holland wrote:
Bob Beck wrote:
...
IMNSHO, a root password for single user makes the system *LESS*
secure, and I'm dead serious. I would object to any attempt to commit
changes to OpenBSD to have one by default. Why? Real simple: *because
you asked this question*. - Now I'm
Peter Philipp wrote:
[snip]
I heard he bitches because he's right most of the time and people realise
this.
Actually 90+ percentile.
(Particularly when he ought to be only 50+ percentile)
Peter Philipp wrote:
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 02:10:05PM -0500, Tony Abernethy wrote:
Peter Philipp wrote:
[snip]
I heard he bitches because he's right most of the time and
people realise
this.
Actually 90+ percentile.
(Particularly when he ought to be only 50+ percentile
Peter Philipp wrote:
[snip]
But little change by little change will isolate
insecurities until a system is secure, right? (didn't somene coin the
phrase security is a process?)
Little change by little change will isolate little insecurities.
Little change by little change will
Will H. Backman wrote:
Dimitry Andric wrote:
Will H. Backman wrote:
The console on OpenBSD 3.9 release doesn't seem to log unknown username
or failed login attempts anywhere.
See this commit:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/syslog.conf#rev1.14
Make the default
Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
Now let us come to disklablels.
There is one disklabel per disk, not one disklabel per DOS partition.
The DOS partitions come into play only while the BIOS is booting
After that, the DOS partitions can contain any nonsense you like.
I suspect you'll do better with
Laurence Tratt
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 08:19:33AM +0100, Dr. Harry Knitter wrote:
sometimes I get the right resolution (1280x1024) sometimes only standard
vga (600x480).
How can I tweak my system to get a reliable KDM with a resolution of
1280x1024?
I'm not sure exactly when, but at
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 12:56:55PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
God is real, unless declared integer.
I thought about this for a while. Given that the Spirit
of God was upon the
waters in Genesis 1, I think it's likely that God is float.
Remember,
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 7/15/08, L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I'm sending an email to misc when a package depends on
X that should
**NOT** depend on X. That's what's broken, obviously, if
you're saying I
should be installing X on a production server. NOT.
tar zxf X
MY APOLOGIES --- getting cross-eyed in my old age.
On 7/16/08, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Unangst wrote:
anip
If a command line tool like git has a 'GUI Helper', then that package is
broken (which, I believe, is the case in this situation).
I most certainly did not write that.
Ted Unangst wrote:
anip
If a command line tool like git has a 'GUI Helper', then that package is
broken (which, I believe, is the case in this situation).
The parallel argument is that if any GUI tool has a command line
helper function, then that package is broken.
(Microsoft Windows still has a
GVG GVG wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:04 AM, J.C. Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday 15 July 2008, GVG GVG wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:54 PM, David Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 03:42:58PM +0200, GVG GVG wrote:
Use the size of your MTU,
Hari wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Silly question, but WHAT IP is actually assigned during install?
I think something like ifconfig before the halt might work
I assume you are installing from CD, not from network
It might be as simple
Hari wrote:
Hello. I just finished installing OpenBSD 4.3. The dhcp setup during
network configuration was fine, meaning, IP address was properly
assigned. I went ahead with the default values provided. However,
after rebooting post installation, I am getting the following messages
that seems to
Hari wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Tomas Bodzar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eh,I missed something.Look at /etc/hosts and $hostname
Why is localhost.WORKGROUP localhost in /etc/hosts and
mercury.my.domain in $hostname
I have long suspected that this is the problem. I am a novice at this
Almir Karic wrote
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 04:33:27PM +0900, Hari wrote:
Hello. I just finished installing OpenBSD 4.3. The dhcp setup during
network configuration was fine, meaning, IP address was properly
assigned. I went ahead with the default values provided. However,
after rebooting post
Marco S Hyman wrote:
snip
To me (and I'll be the first to
admit that this is nothing but opinion and I won't pretend that my opinion
is any better than yours) I see more harm than good in blocking icmp.
I like it when other people tell me I've screwed something up because I
can find it and
chefren wrote
snip
To get it started we should add some hooks of course, and when it's
working FFS should be dumped. Of course the database file system can
still save blobs, being Oracle database or whatever.
How do you use this elegant filesystem to bootstrap
the OS which handles this
Joachim Schipper wrote
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 05:42:14PM -0800, smith wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:07:01 -0600, Damian Wiest wrote
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 03:53:48PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
smith wrote:
Why?:
I've received a few new computers that I have to configure.
Patrick Useldinger wrote:
Does the name really matter?
Yes.
Whether your partition is called 'a' or 'd', doesn't the disklabel
get stored into the beginning of the first
partition anyway?
No.
Actually, you have 16 partitions stored in the disklabel.
This is OpenBSD not DOS.
Patrick Useldinger wrote:
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
I read through the mailing list archives and found a thread
explaining that
the disklabel is stored around the beginning of partition 'a'
and that one
should allocate a small partition 'a' which should not be made
part of the
JBOD.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 partitions:
# sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg]
a: 390721968 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 328 # Cyl 0
-387620
c: 390721968 0 unused 0 0 # Cyl 0
-387620
Most likely, the disklabel or boot
Greg Thomas wrote:
On 2/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Otto Moerbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 partitions:
# sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg
Karl O. Pinc wrote:
On 03/14/2007 09:13:19 AM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
2007/3/13, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This means everyone should have our latest patches installed.
Just a reminder: security-announce exists for messages like
this. Use
it or delete it.
While the bug
Lars D. Nooden wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Dave Anderson wrote:
You've left out the extremely important fact that many vendors
interpret acceptance of blobs by any free OS as validating their
position of not releasing adequate documentation -- so accepting blobs
(even when there's no
Juan Miscaro wrote:
I turn off those annoying checks and I use the same password.
Works great.
/juan
... until it doesn't.
Out of curiosity, WHY should any make install in ports actually DO anything?
Seems like the object of ports is to make packages and packages are installed
by pkg_add.
If you want to be something, say a packager, it helps if you have at least a
slight clue what it is all about.
-Original
You might try reading your own message.
-Original Message-
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of John
Tate
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 9:19 AM
To: Fubar
Cc: Richard Toohey; misc
Subject: Re: Burning DVDs
I have dvd+rw tools and cdrecord still gives
Vitali wrote:
I had some big movie files, development directories and so on which I
...
Vital information missing: File system on the USB drive
Guessing:
The USB Drive is FAT32 which has a size limit of 2G on individual files
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
