was for SMS text.
On 04/10/2007, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may remember that many months ago there was a discussion on this
list about the One Laptop Per Child notebook.
Specifically, the OLPC project was criticised over their reported
signing of NDAs and choice of non-free hardware.
Right
On 05/10/2007, a.padilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I commented everything out except the nat rule and
pass out keep state
still nothing.
Sorry to be basic, but do your NICs have IP addresses?
What do their /etc/hostname.if(5) files say?
What does ifconfig(8) say?
On 05/10/2007, a.padilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ifconfig:
(...)
rl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 00:18:4d:ea:33:0a
groups: egress
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
inet6
Sorry if this is nosy and sounds stupid, but I'm intrigued:
Why would you need your .bat to become a .exe file?
Hiding your code is obviously not a valid reason, or you wouldn't be
asking this on the OpenBSD mailing list.
On 05/10/2007, Frank Bax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does know of a BAT2EXE
surprised your external NIC has one too.
I'm trying to work with what's available to me.
On Oct 5, 2007, at 3:10 PM, ropers wrote:
On 05/10/2007, a.padilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ifconfig:
(...)
rl0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr 00:18:4d:ea
already been pointed out to
you, do your homework, and ask precise questions, then there are
excellent chances that you can get VERY competent answers on this
list. Most people here are a lot more technical than me, and I have
read the 3com PDF ;-)
Bonne chance!
ropers
/
and there's your bat2exe program. Dude just reoranised his website. He
must have missed the Tim BL memo:
http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI
;-)
-ropers
just don't get it. Is anybody in a mood to
enlighten me?
Cheers,
ropers
And of course,
1001001
011
1010101
lacks the sexual innuendo, but it's a super nice thing to tell your
one and only. :)
--ropers
Theo de Raadt wrote:
And there's a few easter eggs hidden in the song as well.
On Oct 8, 2007, at 11:43 AM, ropers wrote:
Okay, I can't bear it any longer. I thought that maybe binary 11
and 1010101 stood for decimal 33 and 85, and that made me think of
ASCII ! and U. But I just
for Au.
But going with Tom's suggestion of a missing 0, 101 1010101 is
plaintext for AU.
So is Gold the answer or is it not you?
I dunno, but me likey! :)
--ropers
be the easiest of options.
Good luck!
--ropers
On 11/10/2007, Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
So, there are some web sites that I need to access that use flash.
Mostly, online product catalogues. Does this mean that I have to use
Debian on my main box to do this since OpenBSD doesn't? Is that more
On 11/10/2007, Marcus Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once upon a time there was a program called loadlin...
Relevancy link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loadlin
On 12/10/2007, Owain Ainsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then again I'm currently attempting to port the DRM (direct rendering
manager) to OpenBSD,
Do you accept paypal donations at your zerooa at googlemail dot com
email address? I'm broke, not rich, so I can't pay you for your work
hours, but
Ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 3 Oct 2006 16:59
Subject: FAQ diff: OpenBSD on the desktop
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Please find below a diff for http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html ;
specifically for http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq1.html#Desktop .
I have also attached the diff as file for you
along these lines might help you or a future reader of the
archives. For the record, my above problems happened with OpenBSD 3.9
-release/i386 and the appropriate sharity-light package.
cheerio,
ropers
There are following packages:
bash-3.1.17
expat-2.0.0
freetype-1.3.1p2
gettext-0.14.5p1
On 10/10/2007, Cidric THIBAULT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank's for your comment. Unfortunately, i well understand the Nat
process.
Huh? If you understand NAT very well, then how is that unfortunate?
I'm not trying to be a prick here; I honestly have trouble
understanding you.
I's right it's
help me and possibly others to understand you better. Please be
specific.
Thanks and regards,
--ropers
On 12/10/2007, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to install fvwm2 in ports on my
OpenBSD 4.2 GENERIC#1179 amd64 ( from official CD )
I get this error, could somebody please help me out
I'm pretty clueless myself, but could this be the reason?
=== fvwm2+fvicons-2.4.19p0
On 08/10/2007, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexey Suslikov wrote:
CL5 is CAS latency I think, but what does PC25100 mean here? :)
PC2-5100
Hm, Wikipedia currently only knows PC2-5300.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR2_SDRAM
Of course Wikipedia is infallible... ;-P
On 13/10/2007, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ropers wrote:
On 08/10/2007, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexey Suslikov wrote:
CL5 is CAS latency I think, but what does PC25100 mean here? :)
PC2-5100
Hm, Wikipedia currently only knows PC2-5300.
http
.
If you as much as dare to touch one of my Jewish fellow humans, know
that people like me will be there to oppose you and your aggression .
--ropers
On 19/10/2007, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I beat you to trying it on Linux
No I didn't. Others beat me and you to it. Apologies for the unnecessary noise.
(...)
IMHO cp behaving like this is somewhat nicer than its current
behaviour on apparently most or all BSD OSes.
I'm surprised
On 19/10/2007, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm surprised now.
I just thought that what I wrote above was stupid, because I thought
that the behaviour of cp was a function of the shell built-in command
cp, not of the OS.
To confirm this, I installed the OpenBSD default shell pdksh
On 19/10/2007, Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/10/2007, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO cp behaving like this is somewhat nicer than its current
behaviour on apparently most or all BSD OSes. Then again, I STILL
can't code, so I've no right to complain. ;o)
Really
On 19/10/2007, Edd Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/10/2007, Richard Toohey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$ mkdir foo
$ cp -R foo foo
Ill try this on a solaris box and a linix box tomorrow at work :P
I beat you to trying it on Linux (Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon 7.10):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
On 22 Oct 2007 01:30:57 +0200, Artur Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Van Looy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on unix everything is a file?
s/unix/Plan 9/g
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_9_from_Bell_Labs
no, it's not. It's the dumbed down truth so that you can explain to
random people
should talk to Christoph Egger, who
did the actual porting work.
Thanks and regards,
--ropers
On 22/10/2007, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/22/07, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/10/2007, carlopmart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I know that time to time somebody do the same question, but I need to
know it:
is it planned at some point to release
On 22/10/2007, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/10/2007, Nick Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/22/07, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/10/2007, carlopmart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I know that time to time somebody do the same question, but I need
on the state of
the port -- much better to simply ask Christoph what the story is. Who
knows, if there turns out to be real interest here, maybe the code can
still be put to use in a way similar to what Nick suggested.
--ropers
possibly makes that OpenBSD
installation subject to bugs in the hypervisor/Dom0, and that may be
unavoidable. The question is, is that a worthwhile trade-off? Is this
a reason not to support Xen? Or should the user be given that option
regardless of the inherent limitations and consequences?
--ropers
, thanks for your hard work. :)
Many thanks in advance and kind regards,
Jens Ropers
? Are you sure your understanding is deeper than his? (No
offense, by the way, all in good humour.)
Cheerio,
--ropers
4.3 or 4.4???
yum
Sorry Jeff, I missed the above earlier on. Is that a yes? Does that
mean that Christoph's code has gone or is going into OpenBSD current?
Thanks and regards,
--ropers
,
--ropers
On 23/10/2007, Chris Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
check the xorg supported hardware list... or the SEE ALSO section of Xorg(1)
(...)
Thank you. (Thanks to Dmitrij as well.)
I gather ATI and NVIDIA appear to be better supported than most
others. Is that true?
In case I end up making a
On 24/10/2007, Lars Noodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously, what (affordable) non-x86 hardware options are available,
especially those without AMT or AMT-like backdoors?
http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/articles/eng/1148.htm
correctly. Does that mean that the port is 240? Does pfsync
use the TCP or UDP port (or both)?
I understand from http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#35
that carp uses IP protocol 112. Does that mean CARP's port is 112?
Does CARP use a TCP or UDP port, or both?
Many thanks in advance,
--ropers
On 10/27/07, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand from http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#35
that carp uses IP protocol 112. Does that mean CARP's port is 112?
Does CARP use a TCP or UDP port, or both?
Stuart wrote:
Neither. This is an IP *protocol* number. icmp is 1, tcp 6, udp
that future
readers remain able to fully appreciate the workings of Cizzz-coeee?
(I would have submitted a diff; unfortunately I don't have access to
an OpenBSD computer right now; I'm just emailing you from some Windows
box.)
Many thanks in advance,
--ropers
On 28/10/2007, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiya,
On http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#35
there is a link to
http://www.cs-ipv6.lancs.ac.uk/ipv6/documents/standards/general-comms/ietf/vrrp/vrrp-minutes-97dec.txt
in the third paragraph of the introductory text.
The link title
On 10/01/2008, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 8:45 PM, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/9/08, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious if you know how Kevin Mitnick was tracked down and
captured?
did the police go to the billing address of the cell phone he
be useful.
--ropers
. It
depends.
Thanks and regards,
--ropers
a lend of an iBook G3 that I
could install OpenBSD on.
Thanks and regards,
--ropers
misc@ emails to me and everybody else. Maybe I'm overly careful, but
it doesn't hurt much to click Delete instead of Report spam.
regards,
--ropers
On 30/01/2008, bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So,
Look for tempest rated computers?
These may be difficult to procure, because according to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TEMPEST even the emission limits remain
classified, nevermind actual kit that one could buy.
--ropers
either repeat the experiment a
bunch of times and/or use a whole bunch of boxes.
Okay, totally off-topic (sorry), but that's what popped into my head.
--ropers
On 30/01/2008, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
She's also sensitive to lower-freq and even DC electric fields (e.g. a
battery with no external current flow) but in a different manner.
I don't understand what you mean by DC electric fields in this
context. A battery without any
physical and
psychosomatic, and the brain can't distinguish and doesn't care how it
started. More enlightened MDs will tell you as much.
How it started is only interesting in trying to find and address
root causes, but it doesn't say anything about how real the pain is.
--ropers
to OpenBSD. ;-P ;-)
Good luck! :)
best regards,
--ropers
On 1 Feb 2008 13:40:10 +0100, Storistes de France
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Storistes de France is currently looking for English Corrections
Officer. We currently need three english corrections officer, someone who
can edit our customer service messages and correct errors in our english
On 01/02/2008, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've also been looking at case cooling methods such as:
http://atechfabrication.com/HTPC_cases.htm
Solid, thick case with fins, and heatpipes to thermally connect CPU/GPU
to the case. Anybody use anything like this before?
That (
My apologies, I know, I'm sending WAY more OT emails than technical
ones right now, but I just **had** to share this:
http://www.osnews.com/images/comics/wtfm.jpg
and better tested/supported?
regards,
--ropers
OpenBSD)).
Thanks and kind regards,
--ropers
).
Thanks and regards,
--ropers
On 07/02/2008, John Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenBSD as DomU works using hardware virtualization for me. There's
the occasional lockup that I haven't looked into too much. You can
launch vncviewer to get a console. My working config is at the bottom.
John
/WXP clients), it
seems to me that it's not offering anything that's truly
interchangeable with AD. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks and regards,
--ropers
On 08/02/2008, Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However,
I suppose that some things internally would be on the EISA bus (e.g.
keyboard, floppy drive).
Huh? The FDC and PS/2 ports are on the EISA bus?
confused /
--ropers
peripherals you want in them. The HDDs I have
are all IDE and mostly pitifully small however. Contact me if you're
interested. (Maybe off-list is better?)
Thanks and regards,
--ropers
(Jens Ropers)
there it still works. That
said, I haven't got a lot of hands-on experience with spam fighting,
so I could be wrong.
regards,
--ropers
PS: Essential listening: http://www.the-fifth-hope.org/mp3/draper-spam.mp3
PPS: I have a transcript of this somewhere. Email me if you want it.
On 07/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, masquerading is a LINUX shit but openbsd rules with its PF power.
FYI, masquerading is a generic term and a synonym for NATing, and
not an invitation to diss Linux.
On Feb 17, 2008 11:23 PM, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are talking about nebulous features that are over hyped and
under proven. One needs a problem first before fixing it. You are
putting it the wrong way around by saying hey I'd like a super duper
faster tcp/ip stack
Will anybody already be in Riga later today (Tuesday)?
I will arrive myself this afternoon.
Would anybody like to meet up?
Cheers,
--ropers
On 20/02/2008, Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 20, 2008 4:58 PM, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mayuresh Kathe [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-02-17 13:38]:
Wouldn't it be nice to have a high performance networking stack?
yeah.
guess what we have?
exactly
On 22/02/2008, Andri Braselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AND the most signifant part of this country is: The highways used to be
illuminated at night with a terrible orange light.
But on the other side: The chocolate and the french fries and some beers
of the different dozens are very
be cheaper than that fancy UPS), restore from
the inactive disk plus online delta backups, and lather, rinse, repeat
till you're the heck outta there.
Sorry if this sounds stupid, it was just a thought that popped into my head.
Thanks and regards,
--ropers
that as well.
YMMV, but I hope this helps.
Thanks and regards,
--ropers
On 05/03/2008, Matthew Szudzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been noticing a similar problem with Firefox on OpenBSD...
I've also experienced this problem, but was never able to reproduce it.
It would happen maybe once every month or two during normal web browsing
(which in my case means
On 06/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 04:25:08PM +0100, ropers wrote:
snip
NB: As for the number of open tabs, Firefox 2.0.0.x is a real sieve
when it comes to memory. It leaks and leaks and leaks... The upcoming
Firefox 3
On 04/04/2008, Peter N. M. Hansteen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dude! This is covered in the archives, FAQ, and man pages!
hm.
$ man god
man: no entry for god in the manual.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149
and then issued badblocks
-svn /dev/devicename whenever I needed to do such checks.
Is there a way to do the same thing with OpenBSD? I am not a
programmer, and anything exceeding script-kiddie level scripting will
probably be over my head.
Many thanks and kind regards,
--ropers
On 18/04/2008, Calomel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ropers,
You can find the badblocks utility prepackaged in e2fsprogs.
THANK YOU! :) I had wondered why I couldn't find badblocks among
OpenBSD's packages. This explains it. I will say in my defense ;-)
that badblocks is not ext2-specific, so
On 19/04/2008, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/04/2008, Calomel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ropers,
You can find the badblocks utility prepackaged in e2fsprogs.
THANK YOU! :) I had wondered why I couldn't find badblocks among
OpenBSD's packages. This explains it. I will say
, and member servers.
The above link should help you with that.
Thanks and regards,
--ropers
I am trying to make [OpenBSD] smaller by deleting unuseful files. I read man
and then deside whether I need it or not. After deleting a dozen of files I
received diffirent errors during startup.
Don't do that then.
I want to install it to 128mb CF.
Unless you really WANT to find yourself
!
:)
ropers
Would you like some cheese?
Greg
Venezuelan Beaver Cheese?
On 10/10/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a box I installed OpenBSD 3.9 on. I'm trying to get this box to
function as our office firewall. Here's the catch - we have VOIP phones
that contact an external VOIP server outside of our firewall. I've been
On 10/10/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/06, Patrick - South Valley Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a box I installed OpenBSD 3.9 on. I'm trying to get this box to
function as our office firewall. Here's the catch - we have VOIP phones
that contact
On 10/10/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
runescape played from the website is a java program, it connects
on ports 43594-43595 and 8010, those are the ports you would need to
throttle and are unlikely to affect standard web traffic.
Good info!
And ports 43594-43595 and 8010 are
On 10/10/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And ports 43594-43595 and 8010 are unlikely to affect *anything* else
-- IANA's well-known ports list shows them as unassigned. Odds are no
one else is using 'em.
I'd like to take back that last sentence. On second thought, it' a
stupid assumption
On 10/10/06, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of you may have been following the OLPC discussion. Here is
one place you can read more about it:
http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/286/
from the above link:
Technically end-users are not Marvell's customers because it
On 11/10/06, Jan Stary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/53928
Oh, this is SUCH torture!
My common sense very resolutely tells me that these strings are pure
gibberish, but I just can't help myself, trying to treat this as
ciphertext. Is it base64? Apparently not,
On 11/10/06, Patrick Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi misc,
I'm trying to setup a new openbsd 3.9 install on i386. It worked before on
that computer when I installed quickly to test for compatibility, but I
needed to finish up some hardware stuff on it and then I wanted to install
for real
On 11/10/06, Martin Gignac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/11/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just had another thought:
Why do the IP phones have to have public IPs?
Is this because giving them NATted, private range IPs previously
didn't work so well?
The VoIP phones Patrick
On 11/10/06, Martin Gignac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I've tried siproxd, but my lack of knowledge has caused me to fail
to get this working properly.
Then using your available public IPs should be the ticket.
-Martin
Yah, it's becoming clearer. Use whatever is cleaner and easier to
On 11/10/06, Martin Gignac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Jens,
On 10/11/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, if you do have enough public IPs to play with, I'd still
consider bridging and using only public IPs (then you don't need to do
VLANs or NAT).
To satisfy my own curiosity, what
I'd like to thank everybody for their comments. I'm listening and
learning. Keep those posts coming! :)
--ropers
On 12/10/06, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or, for that matter, why I needed to enable
net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf for the bridge to work.
just checked and you definitely don't need net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
to bridge. net.inet.ip.forwarding is for IP packets,
make sense of it. I emailed the OP, but haven't gotten
a reply thus far.
Would anyone be able to help?
Many thanks,
--ropers
--
www.ropersonline.com
* ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-10-12 10:26]:
Hi,
Does anybody out there have a working knowledge of Swedish?
I find myself having to use the Tivoli Storage Manager Backup/Archive
client (dsmc).
As much as I would prefer a free solution, this is the only offsite
backup supported in my
For the benefit of the archives:
I also did
touch /emul/linux/etc/mtab
in the process, which I didn't see documented in this context, but an
error message screamed about /etc/mtab missing, so there.
On 12/10/06, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to thank you all very much for your
or not.
Again, many thanks for your help!
:)
--ropers
On 12/10/06, Jon Simola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/06, S t i n g r a y [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am facing problems using hfsc with PF.
That would be the first problem. Mention of HFSC was scrubbed from the
PF FAQ at http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html for good reason.
On 12/10/06, Claus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/2006 1:54 PM, Falk Husemann wrote:
Hello List!
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?
(0)
gotta love selective quoting:
I don't get this question.
a different problem.
Cheerio,
--ropers
On 13/10/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 06:11:16PM +0200, ropers wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody out there have a working knowledge of Swedish?
I find myself having to use the Tivoli Storage Manager Backup/Archive
client (dsmc).
As much as I would prefer
1 - 100 of 554 matches
Mail list logo
