that you need, that is unavailable in 1.3?
mod_proxy_balancer
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
Vim Visual wrote:
Hi,
inspired by the Zurich email, I would like to ask here whether there
is somebody from / living in Berlin in this list
I'm from Berlin:
http://blog.innerewut.de
I often wear my OpenBSD shirts around City-West.
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
Markus Bergkvist wrote:
See release notes on Dnsmasq 2.35
http://freshmeat.net/projects/dnsmasq/?branch_id=1991release_id=239661
OpenBSD-4.0 is due for release very soon and no version of dnsmasq
prior to 2.35 will do DHCP on OpenBSD-4.0.
I'm working on an update of the port to 2.38
Jonathan
*) Ruby
+ Apache chroot
+ Ruby on Rails
- loosely typed
- interpreted
Ruby is strongly but dynamically typed.
So
a = hi
a = 1
is ok but
a = 1
b = a + 1
is not.
I consided this an advantage.
Jonathan
Adam wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2006 12:05:45 -0500 (CDT) L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
my personal favorite:
Rails is MVC, so the URL presented to the user HAS NOT page identifier
(i.e. only the controller name)!
Uh, there's MVC frameworks in pretty much every language. Ruby is
Cheers,
Yes, it is incredibly slow. Here's some benchmarks showing python is
significantly faster in everything but startup time. Even the author
of ruby says ruby is slow, and its planned to make it a bytecode compiled
language like everyone else in ruby 2.
Cheers,
Like I said, I did. Rails is over 3 times slower than django for some
stuff, and ruby in general is far slower for EVERY single script I have
ever compared with.
So Ruby is slower than Python for your application.
The author does not say that Ruby is slow
Yes he does. Unlike
Cheers,
Adam wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 02:08:45 +0200 Jonathan Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So Ruby is slower than Python for your application.
No, it is slower than Python for everything. Every single basic function
of the language is slower, conditionals, loops, instantiating objects
Cheers,
Adam wrote:
On Wed, 24 May 2006 02:51:55 +0200 Jonathan Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You just do not want to understand and flame Rails.
Right, I don't understand.
Yes, you do not understand me.
Its easier to pretend I am just confused than
to face reality and admit that your
it would be
non-trivial at the best.
There is a port for FreeBSD and it works ok. I use it on two 6-stable
systems without any problems. Maybe this port can be a start.
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
happy to just dump it
into ~/bin on my boxes if there's no general interest.
I would really appreciate having mergemaster in the base system.
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
Whey I mailed here is:
Is it good practice at all to mount / read-only?
You should place /dev and /var on other partitions like mfs based ones.
See
http://blog.innerewut.de/articles/2005/05/14/openbsd-3-7-on-wrap
Regards,
ahb
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
/
FreeRADIUS does not work well, at least not out-of-box. Search the archives
for a port submission of freeradius not long ago.
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
-on-openbsd
Many thx
Didier
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
As OpenVPN was mentioned before, I've wrote a HOWTO here:
http://blog.innerewut.de/articles/2005/07/04/openvpn-2-0-on-openbsd
It is very easy to configure and supports Unix, Win, and OS X.
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
Greets,
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
the nwid changed.
I also switched antennas, but no luck.
Greets,
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blog.innerewut.de
Jonathan Weiss wrote:
Cheers,
I have a Problem with a WRAP board (dmesg attached) and a MiniPCI WLAN card.
The card is a Wistron CM9. My /etc/hostname.ath0 looks like this:
#cat /etc/hostname.ath
inet 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 NONE media autoselect \
mediaopt hostap nwid wrap chan 11
. Including a `mode 11b` in the ifconfig/hostname.ath0
statement solved my problem.
Steve Fettig
Thanks for your help,
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blog.innerewut.de
Alexander Yurchenko wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:00:45AM +0200, Jonathan Weiss wrote:
Hi folks,
I own a Wrap box, very similar to the Soekris NET4801 except that it is
lacking USB, IDE and PXE among other minor things.
I own this model:
http://shop.tronico.net/pd1100964260.htm?categoryId=0
much less than file system time
WARNING: using file system time
WARNING: CHECK AND RESET THE DATE!
--
Jonathan Weiss
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blog.innerewut.de
--
Jonathan Weiss
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blog.innerewut.de
22 matches
Mail list logo
