Hello list,
While trying to build base from source on 4.5-stable, I've encountered
the following message
GENERIC:107: berkwdt0: unknown device 'berkwdt'
***Stop.
# cd /dev/
# MAKEDEV all
didn't remove the problem.
I've seen berkwdt has been added to -current.
Did I mess the sources, or
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:10:08 +0200
soko.tica soko.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
While trying to build base from source on 4.5-stable, I've encountered
the following message
GENERIC:107: berkwdt0: unknown device 'berkwdt'
***Stop.
# cd /dev/
# MAKEDEV all
didn't remove the
Hi all.
I have some situation, my machine will not boot after installing
amd64_obsd4.5_stable.
amd64, 250G harddrive (first physical).
0. 1 Primary 100G NTFS (WindowsXP), 1 Secondary 100G NTFS (just data)
1. have free 36G at the end of drive.
2. in windows make blank primary partition (with
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Andrej Elizarov vigilan...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all.
I have some situation, my machine will not boot after installing
amd64_obsd4.5_stable.
amd64, 250G harddrive (first physical).
0. 1 Primary 100G NTFS (WindowsXP), 1 Secondary 100G NTFS (just data)
1. have
Hi all,
I got this panic when I am trying to boot OpenBSD 4.5/sparc64.
The installation was painful, the system panic with cdrom access, http
access, and only worked with the ftp install by network :(
I read the documentation and set security-mode, but it does not work.
any hint?
...
ppb12 at
I try some bootloaders to boot this partition, like MagickBoot and some
others (from Hiren's BootCD). Nope.
I try reinstall windows - it only copy files to hd, then reboot to continue
installation from hd - and again black screen.
2009/6/5 Neal Hogan nealho...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009
Mikolaj Kucharski wrote:
Another scenario. When all VPNs are up and stable (traffic is low) and
one of the clients is rebooted at boot time when ipsecctl -f
/etc/ipsec.conf is executed it's tunell is setup and _all_ other
tunnels are immediately dropped.
Am I right to assume that only those
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:33:17 +0400, Andrej Elizarov wrote
I try some bootloaders to boot this partition, like MagickBoot and some
others (from Hiren's BootCD). Nope.
I try reinstall windows - it only copy files to hd, then reboot to continue
installation from hd - and again black screen.
I'd written:
4. Install MBR program onto boot drive, preserving repaired MBR table
# fdisk -u your boot drive
You probably do not want to use OpenBSD's fdisk to rewrite the MBR program, it
will clear the NT disk signature.
Howdy Victor?
I appear to be having the same problems with the same card.
Do you have any news?
Thanks,
Dhu
On Fri, 29 May 2009 10:33:21 +0200
Viktor Varheit viktorvarh...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
according to radeon(4) my graphics card is supported, but I
cannot get hardware acceleration
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 06:54:05 -0600
Duncan Patton a Campbell campb...@neotext.ca wrote:
Howdy Victor?
I appear to be having the same problems with the same card.
Do you have any news?
Thanks,
Dhu
I read somewhere to disable the radeondrm driver
in kernel and this has worked so
Hi all,
I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1)
and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit
unfair. Could someone explain it?
Information about why wake(8) was removed:
window was removed and tmux was added.
-Mensagem original-
De: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] Em nome de
Pawlowski Marcin Piotr
Enviada: sexta-feira, 5 de Junho de 2009 16:29
Para: misc@openbsd.org
Assunto: tmux vs wake
Hi all,
I'm a little bit curious about why
Hi Misc,
I'm thinking about the best way to accomplish a redundant BGP setup with two
boxes running OpenBGPD.
I know there are 2 ways that are frequently suggested:
First one: active / passive setup with depend on. Bad because sessions are
reset, and bad as well because one router idles while
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1)
and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit
unfair. Could someone explain it?
life isn't fair...
tmux replaced window.
one removed, one
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:53:11 +0200 (MEST)
Mats O Jansson m...@cntw.com wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1)
and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit
unfair. Could
hi,
they're not related to each other, so please stop whining.
but i'm happy to have tmux(1) in base because most of the openbsd
users/hackers i know used to install the screen port on their systems
which is not needed anymore. tmux is nice, it is actively maintained
and developed in the tree,
I want to call execve using my current set of environment variables.
From the manpage:
EXECVE(2)
int execve(const char *path, char *const argv[], char *const envp[]);
ENVIRON(7)
extern char **environ;
An array of strings called the ``environment'' is made available by
execve(2) when a
I got this panic when I am trying to boot OpenBSD 4.5/sparc64.
The installation was painful, the system panic with cdrom access, http
access, and only worked with the ftp install by network :(
I read the documentation and set security-mode, but it does not work.
On a few sparc64 machines,
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Ted Walther t...@reactor-core.org wrote:
execve() wants char *const envp[]
environ provides char **
environ is provided by execve from envp.
How do I pass the environment into execve without raising a compiler
warning about incompatible pointer types?
What
Hi Ted,
I want to call execve using my current set of environment variables.
Any reason not to use plain execv(3)?
Which problem are you trying to solve?
Yours,
Ingo
--
I like SEE ALSO.
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:27:12PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Ted Walther t...@reactor-core.org wrote:
execve() wants ? char *const envp[]
environ provides char **
environ is provided by execve from envp.
How do I pass the environment into execve without raising
Thanks, i'll try.
Just an idea. Signature is already cleared. How can i test it?
2009/6/5 Josh Grosse j...@jggimi.homeip.net
I'd written:
4. Install MBR program onto boot drive, preserving repaired MBR table
# fdisk -u your boot drive
You probably do not want to use OpenBSD's fdisk to
Trying to upgrade to latest i386 snap (dated 6/4/09) on an IBM Thinkpad
T42 produces the following panic:
-
ppb1 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BAM Hub-to-PCI rev 0x81
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
mem address conflict 0xb000/0x1000
mem address conflict 0xb100/0x1000
cbb0 at pci2 dev 0
* alex sp alex@googlemail.com [2009-06-05 17:55]:
I would prefer to connect both carriers to both routers so that still both
carriers remain active when one router fails.
that is what I do, tho in active-passive and only with the two main
upstreams.
peerings and less important upstreams via
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:53:53PM +0400, Andrej Elizarov wrote:
Thanks, i'll try.
Just an idea. Signature is already cleared. How can i test it?
Step 1. Google for nt disk signature.
Step 2. Open the top search result, Windows NT: Disk Management Basics,
a link at microsoft.com.
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Joe Gidi wrote:
Trying to upgrade to latest i386 snap (dated 6/4/09) on an IBM Thinkpad
T42 produces the following panic:
...
uvm_fault(0xd072b960, 0xd23d8000, 0, 1) - e
fatal page fault (6) in supervisor mode
trap type 6 code 0 eip d03fa3bc cs 8 eflags 10046 cr2 d23d8f84
Sorry about my unreadable ASCII art, please have a look at:
http://nopaste.org/p/aB4Lq6knf
Thank you, Henning. I'll set up a test configuration and report how it's
working.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.dewrote:
* alex sp alex@googlemail.com [2009-06-05
On Friday 05 June 2009 11:29:00 Pawlowski Marcin Piotr wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1)
and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit
unfair. Could someone explain it?
Information about why wake(8) was removed:
On Fri, June 5, 2009 3:35 pm, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Joe Gidi wrote:
Trying to upgrade to latest i386 snap (dated 6/4/09) on an IBM Thinkpad
T42 produces the following panic:
...
uvm_fault(0xd072b960, 0xd23d8000, 0, 1) - e
fatal page fault (6) in supervisor mode
trap
On Fri, June 5, 2009 3:55 pm, Gonzalo Lionel Rodriguez wrote:
What model? Becouse i have the same laptop.
This is a 2379-RHU. Dmesg from the current, working snapshot follows:
OpenBSD 4.5-current (GENERIC) #10: Mon May 18 21:33:01 MDT 2009
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:11:39PM -0400, Joe Gidi wrote:
Also, the machine has no serial port, so I can't try the serial console
trick.
It does, but you need the port replicator to access it. Maybe you can
find one you can borrow.
--
Jussi Peltola
Pawlowski Marcin Piotr pawlowski...@gmail.com writes:
Hi all,
I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1)
and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit
unfair. Could someone explain it?
Sure, I'll try to explain. Ready? Brace yourself for the
With the recent work done to the audio system on OpenBSD, a buddy of
mine and I figured it should be easy to setup two-way voice-chat
between two OpenBSD clients using nothing more than aucat(1) and
ssh(1). As we found out, it is both very easy and very usable! We
have telephone-quality chatting
Wow, that's an interesting use of using aucat and ssh, you
made me curious and i'm going to try it :-)
Gilles
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:02:01PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
With the recent work done to the audio system on OpenBSD, a buddy of
mine and I figured it should be easy to setup
2009/6/6, Ryan Flannery ryan.flann...@gmail.com:
ryan# grep ryan /etc/passwd
man id
id -u ryan
Best
Martin
Well, if you'd like to test with a fellow openbsd user and play around
with some of the settings, feel free to hit me up.
ps - I'm loving smtpd... your efforts there are also greatly appreciated.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Gilles Chehadegil...@openbsd.org wrote:
Wow, that's an interesting
Ryan Flannery ha scritto:
With the recent work done to the audio system on OpenBSD, a buddy of
[snip]
audioctl, that one could play with to reduce this?
Maybe is stupid but r just my 2 cent , but trying to use blowfish
cipher? I noticed a little difference using this cipher when i've
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:02:01PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
With the recent work done to the audio system on OpenBSD, a buddy of
mine and I figured it should be easy to setup two-way voice-chat
between two OpenBSD clients using nothing more than aucat(1) and
ssh(1). As we found out, it is
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:02:01PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
Any other options, to aucat or perhaps
audioctl, that one could play with to reduce this?
I forgot to say, audioctl isn't really useful for anything
but exploring/debugging. you really shouldn't mess with
audioctl on a running
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:02:01PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
[...]
deeper and more muted. Any other options, to aucat or perhaps
audioctl, that one could play with to reduce this?
I guess you could try to reduce the buffer size on the aucat *servers*
(-b on the aucat *-l* invocations).
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Joe Gidi wrote:
Trying to upgrade to latest i386 snap (dated 6/4/09) on an IBM Thinkpad
T42 produces the following panic:
...
iwi0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 2915ABG rev 0x05:
irq11iwi0: could not load cmd ring DMA map
uvm_fault(0xd072b960, 0xd23d8000, 0,
cheers
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Hannah Schroeter han...@schlund.de wrote:
Hi!
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 06:02:01PM -0400, Ryan Flannery wrote:
[...]
deeper and more muted. Any other options, to aucat or perhaps
audioctl, that one could play with to reduce this?
I guess you could
On Fri, June 5, 2009 8:01 pm, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Joe Gidi wrote:
Trying to upgrade to latest i386 snap (dated 6/4/09) on an IBM Thinkpad
T42 produces the following panic:
...
iwi0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 Intel PRO/Wireless 2915ABG rev 0x05:
irq11iwi0: could not load
I upgraded a system from 4.4 to 4.5. After the upgrade gv failed when run
because it couldn't find gv_init.ps. locate didn't show gv_init.ps, and when I
tried to list the files in gv I got
$ uname -a
OpenBSD AddisAbaba.hhadmin.monmouth.edu 4.5 GENERIC#1749 i386
$ echo $PKG_PATH
Hi,
I'm running OpenBSD 4.5 with a GENERIC kernel (i386), and my computer
boots after shutdown when I run halt. It's not the same like
rebooting, since when I halt, the computer actually turns off (as in,
all the LEDs are off); but when I reboot it, the LEDs remain on.
This worked fine in OpenBSD
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:22 PM, R. Claytonrvclay...@acm.org wrote:
I upgraded a system from 4.4 to 4.5. B After the upgrade gv failed when run
because it couldn't find gv_init.ps. B locate didn't show gv_init.ps, and
when I
tried to list the files in gv I got
B $ uname -a
B OpenBSD
47 matches
Mail list logo