Re: [Mixxx-devel] Advanced mapping questions

2015-07-24 Thread sb
 There is an open bug to address this though: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/+bug/374239 so please vote for that, but as Be said, we plan to address it with a Control system overhaul. Though addressing this doesn't _require_ a control system overhaul, just the ability for scripts to

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Advanced mapping questions

2015-07-22 Thread Sébastien BLAISOT
--- Sébastien Blaisot you can use : Low = engine.setValue([EqualizerRack1_[Channel1]_Effect1], parameter1, value) Mid = engine.setValue([EqualizerRack1_[Channel1]_Effect1], parameter2, value) High = engine.setValue([EqualizerRack1_[Channel1]_Effect1], parameter3, value) I don't have

Re: [Mixxx-devel] Advanced mapping questions

2015-07-22 Thread Be
There is no good way for inter-device communication without affecting the Mixxx engine. I think in the future there should be a way for scripts to create their own control objects in the future. See also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/+bug/1470278

[Mixxx-devel] Advanced mapping questions

2015-07-22 Thread Stephan Balmer
Hi Mixxxers Thanks for your work on 1.12. I like it, especially having the effects! My 1.12 mapping for the Stanton SCS3 system has progressed into a 'usable for me' state where it has all the functionality I need and it has no known issues that would prevent live use. I've started a thread