Re: [mkgmap-dev] Continue behaviour changed?

2010-02-11 Thread Mark Burton
Hi Steve, Nothing will work 'as before' since it was kind of random what happened. It should now work in the intended manner. Good! If you can give me the tags on the way, other relevant lines in the style, and the result you expect I can let you know if it is a bug or not. For a

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1566: Drop all tags from the osm file that are not used

2010-02-11 Thread Felix Hartmann
Seems to work well for me. On Austria I noticed about 5% compilation time decrease (seems that the dreaded plan.at import is more and more cleaned up...). Denmark drop of course being even bigger (around 35% time decrease) ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with --adjust-turn-headings

2010-02-11 Thread Apollinaris Schoell
Hi Mark, Some Garmin GPS units can tell you which lane to be in (lane assist?) but we don't know how to encode that info. Pity, as that's just what you need here. I know this would be cool but I expect only something simple. attached is gpx with 2 routes for a situation where

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1566: Drop all tags from the osm file that are not used

2010-02-11 Thread WanMil
Version 1566 was commited by steve on 2010-02-08 12:33:09 + (Mon, 08 Feb 2010) BRANCH: style-speed Drop all tags from the osm file that are not used in the applied style. Whether this makes a big difference or not depends on the country. In the UK which is mostly manually taged it

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1566: Drop all tags from the osm file that are not used

2010-02-11 Thread Felix Hartmann
On 11.02.2010 19:59, WanMil wrote: Version 1566 was commited by steve on 2010-02-08 12:33:09 + (Mon, 08 Feb 2010) BRANCH: style-speed Drop all tags from the osm file that are not used in the applied style. Whether this makes a big difference or not depends on the country. In the UK

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1566: Drop all tags from the osm file that are not used

2010-02-11 Thread Marko Mäkelä
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 07:59:01PM +0100, WanMil wrote: The Osm5XMLHandler sometimes throw a NullPointerException in line 397. This is the key.equals(highway) part: if((val.equals(motorway_junction) || val.equals(services)) key.equals(highway)) {

[mkgmap-dev] Commit: r1569: Fix null pointer exception and corrected the

2010-02-11 Thread svn commit
Version 1569 was commited by steve on 2010-02-11 20:05:44 + (Thu, 11 Feb 2010) BRANCH: style-speed Fix null pointer exception and corrected the logic of creating nodes. ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] - fix Table C size bug + allow Table B to contain up to 255 entries

2010-02-11 Thread Felix Hartmann
I'm using --no-turn-restrictions and couldn't notice any changes in Mapsource. Might not be the ideal candidate for testing. ___ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] - fix Table C size bug + allow Table B to contain up to 255 entries

2010-02-11 Thread Mark Burton
Hello Felix, I'm using --no-turn-restrictions and couldn't notice any changes in Mapsource. Might not be the ideal candidate for testing. The option is actually called --ignore-turn-restrictions, that's what you meant? Mark ___ mkgmap-dev mailing

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Gmapibuilder: Searching for new site to host source code

2010-02-11 Thread Clinton Gladstone
On Feb 10, 2010, at 23:25, Lambertus wrote: As a sidenote, I got a mail today about Gmapibuilder results claiming that the MapInstaller gives an error with my latest map release. Since I haven't changed gmapibuilder it might be something in Mkgmap (r1557) that triggers this. Is someone

Re: [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH v2] - fix Table C size bug + allow Table B to contain up to 255 entries

2010-02-11 Thread Felix Hartmann
On 11.02.2010 22:32, Mark Burton wrote: Hello Felix, I'm using --no-turn-restrictions and couldn't notice any changes in Mapsource. Might not be the ideal candidate for testing. The option is actually called --ignore-turn-restrictions, that's what you meant? Just