Hi Mike,
the problem in the sample is that there are 5 ways, each with 2 nodes.
So, we cannot delete any node without also deleting the corresponding way,
and that would mean that we might remove important routing information.
Besides that you are right, we have to detect that spike. I just
Hi Gerd, I don't know anything about this bit of code, but the problem in
the before and after pictures look to me like they are not the result of
attempting to fix the angle, but look like they are the result of the second
and fourth nodes in the spur both rounding to the same point, and it seems
Hi Carlos,
okay, committed with r591.
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Carlos
Dávila
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. März 2018 13:12:45
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: [mkgmap-dev]
Attached is a patch that sets the same time format that was recently
changed for mkgmap. I just copied the changes from mkgmap (I'm not a
developer), so please check if it's correct before commit.
Index: src/uk/me/parabola/splitter/Main.java
Hi Gerd,
yes basically I was thinking of more or less the node with only containing the
double way and moving all the mkgmap:access information to the left-over node
of that double way. So need some post-processing of WAF.
Henning
On 9 Mar 2018, 19:21, at 19:21, Gerd Petermann
Hi Henning,
I assume with "move access to the node" you mean something like "create route
restrictions similar to the access restrictions of the way"?
This would be quite difficult when a style adds the short way multiple times
with different attributes. I think this doesn't happen in Felix'
How about merging ways shorter than 1 unit if they are similar or deleting them
and move access to the node?
Or just delete such ways only going force and back. And moving access to the
node.
Henning
On 9 Mar 2018, 16:15, at 16:15, Gerd Petermann
wrote:
>Hi