Re: [mkgmap-dev] Deletion of unneeded hgt files

2021-04-03 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Carlos, please double check: I don't have files for N60E157, N72E057 and N77E083 I have a N64W180.hgt with a few non-zero values. Results are in new patch. Gerd Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila Gesendet: Samstag, 3. April 2021 13:27

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Deletion of unneeded hgt files

2021-04-03 Thread Carlos Dávila
Regarding tiles covering Caspian Sea (N37E051 to N44E049), I thought it's height would be 0, but if the real height is -29m then they should not be removed from known-hgt.txt. But they are no longer available from SRTM or ALOS. The other tiles removed in my patch are in open sea areas, so

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Deletion of unneeded hgt files

2021-04-03 Thread Carlos Dávila
Updated patch with typo El 3/4/21 a las 9:45, Carlos Dávila escribió: Attached patch deletes some hgt files which correspond to ocean areas from known-hgt.txt file. They just lead to confusing warnings when running mkgmap to generate a map with DEM.

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Deletion of unneeded hgt files

2021-04-03 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Carlos, not sure what to do with this. Seems your patch removes the files which are listed here: https://www.opentopodata.org/notes/invalid-srtm-zips/ My SRTM directory contains the listed files and they show a constant height of -29m as stated in the linked page. My understanding is that

[mkgmap-dev] Deletion of unneeded hgt files

2021-04-03 Thread Carlos Dávila
Attached patch deletes some hgt files which correspond to ocean areas from known-hgt.txt file. They just lead to confusing warnings when running mkgmap to generate a map with DEM. Index: resources/known-hgt.txt === ---

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Behavior of overview options

2021-04-03 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Carlos, I'd prefer to change the default or remove the option. @Steve: Do you remember why it was done this way? Is it still needed? Gerd Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila Gesendet: Freitag, 2. April 2021 19:19 An: