Nop schrieb am 08.12.2009 22:09:
Well, I am already maintaining one tool and two maps, so I guess
attacking a non-trivial problem in a completely unfamiliar software on
top of that doesn't sound like a particularly good idea.
Actually I am not sure, whether the advanced multipolygons
Hi!
Am 09.12.2009 16:41, schrieb Torsten Leistikow:
Nop schrieb am 08.12.2009 22:09:
Actually I am not sure, whether the advanced multipolygons themself are a
particularly good idea. So perhaps this might be a perfect match :-)
In the end, there are two possible solutions for this problem:
Well, I am already maintaining one tool and two maps, so I guess
attacking a non-trivial problem in a completely unfamiliar software on
top of that doesn't sound like a particularly good idea.
I don't fear to have a look on it. But I am quite new to mkgmap so any
hints where I can start and
Hi!
Are there any plans to support advanced multipolygons in mkgmap?
As this type of polygons is supported by both mapnik and osmarender,
they are used more frequently. Mkgmap seems to ignore this type
completely and more and more larger forests disappear off the Garmin
maps, like this area
Hi Nop,
Are there any plans to support advanced multipolygons in mkgmap?
Sorry, I can only give you a negative reply in that I know that I won't
be signing up for working on that.
Still, all contributions are welcome, if you can program, why not have
a go at it yourself?
Cheers,
Mark
Hi!
Mark Burton schrieb:
Are there any plans to support advanced multipolygons in mkgmap?
Sorry, I can only give you a negative reply in that I know that I won't
be signing up for working on that.
Still, all contributions are welcome, if you can program, why not have
a go at it
