On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:03 PM, WanMil wmgc...@web.de wrote:
The mp 406715 does not follow this rule. I don't know if that's a
problem or not but you may consider to tag the multipolygon instead of
all ways.
Thanks! This did seem to fix the problem for me...
--
Jeff Ollie
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Apollinaris Schoell
ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
relation looks good. You should try to create just a single tile first to
see if it's mkgmap or splitter.
splitter clips ways from relations outside of the tile and this is a known
problem. recent versions of
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Apollinaris Schoell
ascho...@gmail.com wrote:
relation looks good. You should try to create just a single tile first to see
if it's mkgmap or splitter.
splitter clips ways from relations outside of the tile and this is a known
problem. recent versions of
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
Can someone take a look at relation 406175 (Skunk River and some
related waterways in central Iowa)?
Actually that should be 406715.
--
Jeff Ollie
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
relation looks good. You should try to create just a single tile first to see
if it's mkgmap or splitter.
splitter clips ways from relations outside of the tile and this is a known
problem. recent versions of mkgmap can repair in most cases by closing the
multipolygon at the tile boundary. But
