Hi,
I use the standard Garmin types for contour lines, 0x20, 0x21 and 0x22
I created the contour lines with Srtm2Osm, split srtm.osm data with the same
tile area bounds as my map. Now I have two img's of the same area,
one with osm data, one with contour lines.
E.g. 10010001.img and 10010101.img
Hi,
Is there a way of disabling the multipolygon processing completely? I
generate a routing layer that has no areas nor does it care about
relations, so it would be nice if I could disable multipolygon
processing to make things quicker.
--
Charlie
Hello Torsten,
highway=* mkgmap_routing=foot {set motor_vehicle=no} [0x09 road_class=1
road=speed=1 resolution 22]
motor_vehicle is not understood by mkgmap - how about:
{set access=no; set foot=yes}
Cheers,
Mark
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
Mark Burton schrieb am 20.02.2010 14:02:
motor_vehicle is not understood by mkgmap - how about:
{set access=no; set foot=yes}
Ah, that does the trick. Thanks!
Gruss
Torsten
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
On Feb 12, 2010, at 12:46, Mark Burton wrote:
Is through route documented in the OSM Wiki? I was unable to find
any information on this.
Not yet, but it should be. I was rather hoping that some kind person
would add a page to the Wiki describing it.
So about adding this to the Wiki: is
Hi Clinton,
On Feb 12, 2010, at 12:46, Mark Burton wrote:
Is through route documented in the OSM Wiki? I was unable to find
any information on this.
Not yet, but it should be. I was rather hoping that some kind person
would add a page to the Wiki describing it.
So about adding
With some detours, I finally got the elevation profile working in my mapset ;-)
I dont know if it now worked because I also installed Garmin Basecamp.
First, I had all map tiles and contour img's in one mapset.
They are still there, but now I created another tdb index file
with mkgmap on all
Hello Mark,
motor_vehicle is not understood by mkgmap
Actually, why not? If my memory serves right, mkgmap understands
motorcar and motorcycle (and maps them to the same access bit), but why
not motor_vehicle? For example in my understanding, tractors are
covered by motor_vehicle but not
Hello Mark,
motor_vehicle is not understood by mkgmap
Actually, why not? If my memory serves right, mkgmap understands
motorcar and motorcycle (and maps them to the same access bit), but why
not motor_vehicle? For example in my understanding, tractors are
covered by motor_vehicle but not
Am 20.02.2010 11:06, schrieb Minko:
Hi,
I use the standard Garmin types for contour lines, 0x20, 0x21 and 0x22
I created the contour lines with Srtm2Osm, split srtm.osm data with the same
tile area bounds as my map. Now I have two img's of the same area,
one with osm data, one with contour
Version 1581 was commited by marko on 2010-02-20 21:35:50 + (Sat, 20 Feb
2010)
Move leisure=sports_centre below sport=*
so that it will only be used when no matching sport=* is specified.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Hi Marko,
motor_vehicle is not understood by mkgmap
Actually, why not? If my memory serves right, mkgmap understands
motorcar and motorcycle (and maps them to the same access bit), but why
not motor_vehicle? For example in my understanding, tractors are
covered by motor_vehicle but
Hi!
I am relatively new to mkgmap but I searched the archive and found no
answers.
So I try to find help in this mailing list.
I know that generate-sea is still buggy but I cannot achieve any blue
sea. I try to generate a routable map of the Canary Islands.
With the mkgmap version 1580 I do
13 matches
Mail list logo
