This way is tagged as a amenity=townhall and a multipolygon relation:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/24159829
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/452620
In my style:
polygons:
building=* | man_made=* | amenity=* | tourism=* [0x13 resolution 24]
and in the points:
Am 17.11.2010 13:34, schrieb Greg Troxel:
So I think that the relation inherits tags from the outer way, and thus
both the multipolygon and the way get a poi point generated. I don't
think this is a mkgmap bug.
Another possible reason: The MP Code splits the MP to several normal
polygons
AFAIK, the correct way of tagging is:
way 1 - amenity=townhall
way 2 - no tag
relation
type=multipolygon
way 1 = outer
way 2 = inner
I'll check other data to verify.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com writes:
This
Can anyone confirm this? (I don't read code sorry)
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Chris66 chris66...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 17.11.2010 13:34, schrieb Greg Troxel:
So I think that the relation inherits tags from the outer way, and thus
both the multipolygon and the way get a poi point generated.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:37:17PM +0800, maning sambale wrote:
Can anyone confirm this? (I don't read code sorry)
If moving all tags from the role=outer way to the multipolygon relation
fixes the problem, then Greg Troxel is right. If not, then Chris is
right. I may have observed similar
maning sambale schrieb am 17.11.2010 14:36:
AFAIK, the correct way of tagging is:
way 1 - amenity=townhall
way 2 - no tag
relation
type=multipolygon
way 1 = outer
way 2 = inner
I'll check other data to verify.
This one of the possible solutions.
Also ok would be
way 1 - no tag
way
There is a problem in the style handling. ! is not working.
Assume I would like to reverse the statement
layer0
into meaning layer 0 does not exist. Currently I could write layer!=-1
layer!=-2 and so on. But that sums up to quite a lot of text.
Essentially I would like to have the following
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 07:43:32PM +0100, Felix Hartmann wrote:
There is a problem in the style handling. ! is not working.
How should it work? I haven't seen such an operator in any language. The
SGML start-of-comment ! comes closest.
Is there a reason why you cannot use =, or is that not
Hello
instead of ! you could use = or =. I don't know if there is a difference.
For example:
( tracktype=5 | tracktypeadded=yes )
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/not-working-problem-with-conditions-in-style-file-tp5748938p5749098.html
Sent from the Mkgmap
aighes schrieb am 17.11.2010 20:21:
instead of ! you could use = or =. I don't know if there is a difference.
For example:
( tracktype=5 | tracktypeadded=yes )
I think he wants to have
(tracktype!=* | tracktype5)
The difference is, when there is no tracktype defined at all.
Gruss
Torsten
Another possible reason: The MP Code splits the MP to several
normal polygons (without holes), each getting a POI. But this
is just a guess.
Can anyone confirm this? (I don't read code sorry)
Hi, I created a test file with one park and one golf_course.
Number of POIs seems to match the
Number of POIs seems to match the number of holes:
http://up.picr.de/5665803.jpg
Result is the same if tagging the relation and not
the outer way.
Chris
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
On 17.11.2010 20:32, Torsten Leistikow wrote:
aighes schrieb am 17.11.2010 20:21:
instead of ! you could use = or=. I don't know if there is a difference.
For example:
( tracktype=5 | tracktypeadded=yes )
I think he wants to have
(tracktype!=* | tracktype5)
The difference is, when
Marko Mäkelä marko.mak...@iki.fi writes:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:37:17PM +0800, maning sambale wrote:
Can anyone confirm this? (I don't read code sorry)
If moving all tags from the role=outer way to the multipolygon relation
fixes the problem, then Greg Troxel is right. If not, then
As far as I remember it, It should to be tagged in the outer way. But
the wiki says otherwise,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon#Usage
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Marko Mäkelä marko.mak...@iki.fi writes:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:37:17PM
15 matches
Mail list logo