On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit :
>> Yesterday I worked through almost all the remaining non-handle calls
>> in the fast path for JRuby dyncalls, replacing them with adapter
>> handles of various shapes and sizes. The general sequence for a simple
>
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:25 PM, John Rose wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>
> I've just noticed that you can aggregate the two calls to dropArguments
> into one with two object classes.
>
>
> Also, permuteArguments (despite its strict-sounding name) lets you drop and
> dup ar
On Jul 2, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
I've just noticed that you can aggregate the two calls to
dropArguments
into one with two object classes.
Also, permuteArguments (despite its strict-sounding name) lets you
drop and dup arbitrarily.
-- John
__
Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit :
> I thought I'd update all on the progress of indy integration in JRuby.
>
> Yesterday I worked through almost all the remaining non-handle calls
> in the fast path for JRuby dyncalls, replacing them with adapter
> handles of various shapes and sizes. The general seq
I thought I'd update all on the progress of indy integration in JRuby.
Yesterday I worked through almost all the remaining non-handle calls
in the fast path for JRuby dyncalls, replacing them with adapter
handles of various shapes and sizes. The general sequence for a simple
call now uses drop, fo
