On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Sam Tregar wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Tom Brown wrote:
?? AFAIK, Files opened in append mode, and written to without buffering,
should _not_ get corrupted in any manner that flock would prevent.
(basically small writes should be atomic.)
Right, and does Perl
Is the webserver useful if you have an error that warrants sending a
mail? If sending an email means the server is broken having a flood of
mails may be a feature. It will be incentive to fix whatever is
breaking your server/db.
Also, I would strongly recommend keeping your warning system as
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Bill Marrs wrote:
It's copy-on-write. The swap is a write-to-disk.
There's no such thing as sharing memory between one process on disk(/swap)
and another in memory.
agreed. What's interesting is that if I turn swap off and back on again,
what? doesn't seem to me
No, I can't explain the nitty gritty either. :-)
Someone should write up a summary of this thread and ask in a
technical linux place, or maybe ask Dean Gaudet.
I believe this is a linux/perl issue... stand alone daemons exhibit the
same behaviour... e.g. if you've got a parent PERL daemon
By 'compiled code ... just like that in Java' do you mean byte code?
You may want to look at
http://perlmonks.org/index.pl?lastnode_id=864node_id=76685
which I found by searching for 'compiled' at perlmonks.org.
Your client is making a strange request. Most people put a higher
value on source
better, someone has written a makerpm.pl script which will build a .spec
file for an RPM, from which you can build .src.rpm or .i386.rpm files...
there is a version out there that works with rpm4, I won't post the it
here in the hopes that someone who is maintaining a version _will_ speak
up...
"mod_perl: 20 billion hits served"
And turn the "m" into a stylized arch. :)
LOL!! Way to go, Randal!
Or how about a play on the old Superman line?
A graphic with O'Reilly's Eagle and a caption like
"Look! Up on the net! It's a bird! It's a plane!
No, it'swait, it *is* a
This is a general Unix webserver issue and not specific to
mod_perl, so I've marked your message [OT] for off-topic.
Well, workarounds are available for specific webserver environments, so I
don't believe it's an inappropriate question.
With CGI, you use the suexec mechanism
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Pierre Phaneuf wrote:
Pierre Phaneuf wrote:
Does anyone has an idea about this? I think I have proper behavior from
my perl handler by installing it at the root of the server, but this is
no real solution!
What I am doing wrong here???
I'm really stumped with
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Andrew Ho wrote:
Hello,
The other day we had a system fail because the partition that holds the
logs became full, and Apache stopped responding to requests. Deleting some
old log files in that partition solved the problem.
We pipe logs to cronolog
Yes, yes, yes it was a bad suggestion. Sorry about that.
I still didn't complete this section, looking for a clean solution to find
a way to close only the fd that keeps the socket busy.
So far you can use the closing fds in loop -- at least it works.
yuck... you'd either have to find some
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Ajit Deshpande wrote:
2. The POD for Apache::Registry says that it doesn't like __END__ and
__DATA__ tokens. So what affect do these actually have if left in? Does
In scripts? it's a syntax error, but that's a completely separate issue
from modules which get used "as
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Tom Brown wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Ajit Deshpande wrote:
2. The POD for Apache::Registry says that it doesn't like __END__ and
__DATA__ tokens. So what affect do these actually have if left in? Does
In scripts? it's a syntax error, but that's a completely
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, J. J. Horner wrote:
If I'm way off base, please let me know. I'm spending considerable
brain power on this idea and if I'm wasting it, I need to know. I
don't have much spare brain power and I could use it to try to figure
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Ben Thompson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 09:32:41AM -0800, brian moseley wrote:
if you really feel the need to compete with php in the
lowest tier web app space, you need to make simplicity your
#1 goal. php is awesome entry level technology, and i almost
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Hi there,
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jerrad Pierce wrote:
Is anybody using GzipChain?
IIRC, Josh said he was. He didn't complain about it. Raved, in fact.
Is there some known means of verifying that it is in fact working properly?
LWP?
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, martin langhoff wrote:
Chris,
i'd bet my head a few months ago someone announced an apache::bench
module, that would take a log and run it as a benchmarking secuence of
HTTP requests. just get to the list archives and start searching with
I wrote a simple perl
Interesting, the Mason bug report I just filed is obviously mis-filed.
Apache::Registry scripts suffer the same behaviour.
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Dave Rolsky wrote:
Try the following handler:
package Foo;
use Apache::Request;
sub handler
{
my $r = shift;
my (@vars) = (
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Bakki Kudva wrote:
I recently upgraded to perl5.6 and added php4 to my apache server. I
don't know what I did wrong but I am getting the following errors.
If I do a httpd -l I get...
suexec: disabled; invalid wrapper /usr/local/apache/bin/suexec
your copy of suexec is
Kilobytes transferred this connection
ChildMegabytes transferred this child
Slot Total megabytes transferred this slot
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 11:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Proxy setup w/ SSL
initiating many c
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Denton River wrote:
Its been a long time since i have done a jobb without using sessions. I would
really like to have this feature included in the kit im using and i think
alot of developers are with me on this one.
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Barry Hoggard wrote:
Nothing is wrong with that solution if you only have a few domains.
We own a lot of misspellings of our company name, so I don't want to
add each of them individually to the conf file.
double that count... since you also nicely solved the problem
first off, David Hodgkinson's comments are correct... Stas's guide is very
thorough, and covers pretty much all of this.
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Nigel Hamilton wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to setup mod_perl in an Apache/Red Hat
Linux/mySQL environment for the last couple of weeks.
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Joshua Chamas wrote:
your machine. Therefore you should configure the server, so that the
maximum number of possible processes will be small enough using the
CMaxClients directive. This will ensure that at the peak hours the
system won't swap. Remember that swap
Also, my system has cgiexec (does suid for CGI scripts) installed. The
cgiexec documentation says that once cgiexec is installed, it is a
security risk if people can execute code as "nobody" since that user has
special access to the cgiexec code. Right now, anyone can execute code as
nobody
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Ime Smits wrote:
| Also, my system has cgiexec (does suid for CGI scripts) installed. The
| cgiexec documentation says that once cgiexec is installed, it is a
| security risk if people can execute code as "nobody" since that user has
| special access to the cgiexec code.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Jesse Wolfe wrote:
I am working with www.superb.net to get their mod_perl up and working
again. They have great infrastrucure, lots of great tools, and an amazing
price.
They had apache/mod_perl for awhile, and upgrades broke it. I expect they
will have it in a week or
I'm reading between the lines here, but it sounds like you are trying to
have _one_ parent apache daemon that services _everything_ on the machine
(likely _more_ than one website), which would imply that you are going to
have an _extremely_ low hit ratio on your mod_perl scripts.
nahh,
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, BeerBong wrote:
Hello all!
I need encrypted access to some directories on some virtual hosts.
I have lightweight proxy apache server and backend mod_perl server.
mod_ssl is not a light thing, and I need encrypt mod_perl'd script results
only, therefore I think
29 matches
Mail list logo
