RE: Anyone tried mod_perl in Windows?

2000-09-12 Thread bill chmura
I tried the binary installation, which needed a specific version of perl installed in a specific place. Worked okay, but was a pain in the ass. I know you can install the XML::DOM into Activestate through PPM - not sure about GD -Original Message- From: jihawfoo [SMTP:[EMAIL

RE: Why can't I use a package name under Apache::Registry - whoooohah

2000-07-12 Thread bill chmura
: ged [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 7:51 AM To: WBChmura Cc: ged Subject:Re: Why can't I use a package name under Apache::Registry Hi there, On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, bill chmura wrote: #!/opt/perl5/bin/perl print "Content-type: text/html\n\n&qu

Why can't I use a package name under Apache::Registry

2000-07-11 Thread bill chmura
Hello, I have a problem with using apache::Registry and have not been able find an answer in the eagle book or the mod_perl site, so i am missing something here. If I take the following script and run it under apache::registry it runs fine: #!/opt/perl5/bin/perl print "Content-type:

Why can't I use a package name under Apache::Registry (Continued)

2000-07-11 Thread bill chmura
2000 3:29 PM To: WBChmura Cc: darren Subject:Re: Why can't I use a package name under Apache::Registry bill chmura ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect: If I throw a package name in there (like below) it still runs fine as a standalone script and CGI script, but un

Header issues with Mod_Perl and CGI.pm

2000-06-15 Thread bill chmura
I cannot seem to get this to work correctly. I just got Mod_Perl installed on my webserver (Apache 1.3.3 on HPUX) I am trying to get a script working that sets a cookie on the users machine -. This is where it goes all wrong. The script uses CGI.pm (v 2.36) to do everything from headers