Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?;

2000-09-27 Thread Simon_Wilcox
ime 20:50 Copy to[EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Simon Wilcox/BASE/WilliamsLea) Bcc Simon Wilcox/BASE/WilliamsLea Fax to Subject Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?; Gunther Birznieks wrote: I unfortunately have to agree. snip And in the end, th

Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?;

2000-09-27 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote: At 10:28 PM 9/26/2000 +0200, Alexander Farber (EED) wrote: Doug MacEachern wrote: modperl is the best kept secret on the net. Shame! seems to generate plenty of list traffic for a "secret" ;) Don't you all think, that mod_perl isn't promoted

Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?;

2000-09-27 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: We all have to do our part to evangelize mod_perl more. I think ISPs are really key here as I think I may have mentioned before. If you get the ISPs Actually I think the people we need to get involved are the web site builders - the larger

Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?;

2000-09-27 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: Actually I think the people we need to get involved are the web site builders - the larger companies offering dynamic web content creation. We also need some more mainstream tools, the oft-requested

Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?;

2000-09-26 Thread Alexander Farber (EED)
Doug MacEachern wrote: modperl is the best kept secret on the net. Shame! seems to generate plenty of list traffic for a "secret" ;) Don't you all think, that mod_perl isn't promoted enough and this will kill it someday, despite its technical goodness? - There are no articles in the

Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?;

2000-09-26 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 10:28 PM 9/26/2000 +0200, Alexander Farber (EED) wrote: Doug MacEachern wrote: modperl is the best kept secret on the net. Shame! seems to generate plenty of list traffic for a "secret" ;) Don't you all think, that mod_perl isn't promoted enough and this will kill it someday, despite its

Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?;

2000-09-26 Thread ed
Gunther Birznieks wrote: I unfortunately have to agree. snip And in the end, the salaries for mod_perl programmers are pretty high right now because of it -- so will a system really cost less to develop in mod_perl than in Java if Java programmers are becoming less expensive than mod_perl

Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?

2000-09-15 Thread Justin
Thanks for the hint. It worked perfectly. I didnt connect Cluck, and BEGIN. doh. nobody spotted the unintended irony in my question .. perl-status itself (Apache::Status) was the one pulling in CGI.pm !! Turns out, if you load Apache::Request before Apache::Status, it uses that instead of the

Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?;

2000-09-15 Thread Stas Bekman
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Justin wrote: Can anyone tell me the easiest slickest way of determining what was responsible for requesting a module, having discovered that it has been loaded when viewing perl-status? use OtherPackage; # because you

Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?;

2000-09-15 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Justin wrote: Can anyone tell me the easiest slickest way of determining what was responsible for requesting a module, having discovered that it has been loaded when viewing

tracking down why a module was loaded?;

2000-09-14 Thread Justin
Can anyone tell me the easiest slickest way of determining what was responsible for requesting a module, having discovered that it has been loaded when viewing perl-status? and while I've got the podium: I would like to congratulate Doug and everyone involved in modperl.. by checking

Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?;

2000-09-14 Thread Stas Bekman
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Justin wrote: Can anyone tell me the easiest slickest way of determining what was responsible for requesting a module, having discovered that it has been loaded when viewing perl-status? A.pm: - package A; use Carp (); BEGIN { Carp::cluck("I don't want to wake

Re: tracking down why a module was loaded?;

2000-09-14 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Justin wrote: Can anyone tell me the easiest slickest way of determining what was responsible for requesting a module, having discovered that it has been loaded when viewing perl-status? use OtherPackage; # because you need import to be defined first sub