Re: Server refusing connections

1999-01-20 Thread James H.G. Redekop
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: No, when the above two commands didn't complain the server.crt and server.key are at least in correct format. Then, as you already mentioned yourself in another reply, you should check the file permissions. Perhaps the files are not readable for the user who

Re: Suggestion

1999-01-20 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999, Magnus Stenman wrote: It would be nice if httpd would check its name when starting up -- if its httpsd, define SSL, otherwise don't Then you only have to create a symlink to httpd named httpsd to choose which type of server to run instead of the "ugly" -DSSL The

Re: [BugDB] Compilation error (PR#85)

1999-01-20 Thread bugdb-mod-ssl
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Version: 2.1.7-1.3.4 OS: AIX 4.2 / apache 1.3.4 Submission from: felix.adpcl.com (194.98.137.100) Error when compiling src/modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c "ssl_expr.h", line 103.51: 1506-046 (S) Syntax error. Yes, that's because of a

Re: [BugDB] Compilation error (PR#86)

1999-01-20 Thread bugdb-mod-ssl
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Version: 2.1.7-1.3.4 OS: AIX 4.2 / apache 1.3.4 Submission from: felix.adpcl.com (194.98.137.100) Error when compiling ca-fix.c example: make certificate TYPE=test + finding random files on your platform + building ca-fix

Re: Server refusing connections

1999-01-20 Thread James H.G. Redekop
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: It's fine, I tracked things down. The wrong key file had been copied over to the production server, so it didn't match the crt. Thanks for the advice in any case! Oh, that's good news ;-) Then it was just some sort of a configuration error... Yes --

[BugDB] mod_ssl 2.1.7 doesn't work on Digital Unix (PR#83)

1999-01-20 Thread bugdb-mod-ssl
Full_Name: Andrew J Cosgriff Version: 2.1.7 OS: Digital Unix 4.0D Submission from: proxy.monash.edu.au (130.194.11.7) Upgrading from apache 1.2.6+ben'ssl to 1.3.4 + mod_ssl 2.1.7 has caused me a fair bit of grief - everything seems fine (i'd done the upgrade on Solaris boxes with no problems)

Re: Questions about mod_ssl with ie

1999-01-20 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999, Shane Wegner wrote: I have setup mod_ssl with Apache 1.3.4 on my web server according to the instructions in the INSTALL file. I used a self-signed key with "make certificate TYPE=custom" and it worked in lynx without a problem. Tests in s_client showed a 1024 bit

Re: [BugDB] mod_ssl 2.1.7 doesn't work on Digital Unix (PR#83)

1999-01-20 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Upgrading from apache 1.2.6+ben'ssl to 1.3.4 + mod_ssl 2.1.7 has caused me a fair bit of grief - everything seems fine (i'd done the upgrade on Solaris boxes with no problems) but as soon as i try and connect to the https port through my

Questions about mod_ssl with ie

1999-01-20 Thread Shane Wegner
Hi, I have setup mod_ssl with Apache 1.3.4 on my web server according to the instructions in the INSTALL file. I used a self-signed key with "make certificate TYPE=custom" and it worked in lynx without a problem. Tests in s_client showed a 1024 bit key. I then fired up the win95 machine and

Re: Server refusing connections

1999-01-20 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999, James H.G. Redekop wrote: [...] Usually it doesn't matter where it was generated, because the format and encoding is standardized. What you should do is to run the commands $ ssleay x509 -noout -text -in server.crt $ ssleay rsa -noout -text -in

Re: [BugDB] Server refusing connections (PR#84)

1999-01-20 Thread bugdb-mod-ssl
On Tue, Jan 19, 1999, James H.G. Redekop wrote: [...] Usually it doesn't matter where it was generated, because the format and encoding is standardized. What you should do is to run the commands $ ssleay x509 -noout -text -in server.crt $ ssleay rsa -noout -text -in