On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Alex Kotov wrote:
After a while the server processes become stuck while waiting for
the data from a socket.
Running strace on a hung process produces
read(5,
for a long time, eventually followed by
read(5, 0x959d2d8, 11) = -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out)
Are you
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, RON MCKEEVER wrote:
Im a little confused on how to upgrade my current mod_ssl-2.8.7-1.3.23, to
mod_ssl-2.8.10-1.3.26.
When I untar the new apache1.3.26 it is in it own dir.. So how do I upgrade
1.3.23? When I run the configure statement in the mod_ssl-2.8.10 dir I cant
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Thomas Binder wrote:
Then when you run 'make install' from the Apache 1.3.26 source
directory, it will overwrite your 1.3.23 installation.
Just in case anyone wonders: it will NOT overwrite the config
files of the 1.3.23 installation.
Oh right... meant to point that
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, RON MCKEEVER wrote:
I currently have mod_ssl-2.8.7-1.3.23(apache) deal. I have seen the
security issue and the suggetions to upgrade to 2.0 or 1.3.26.
Couple of questions, Please.
1. Can I just install the new apache version over my old install? And
will it still use
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per the recently announced vulnerability in versions of apache 1.3.26,
I decided to be a happy little prole and update all of my webservices.
Unpacking clean source for apache, mod_ssl and mod_perl-1.26, I upgraded
the packages like I always do:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Shon Stephens wrote:
i am trying to compile modssl. before i can do so, i need to get openssl
compiled and working. i did not want to use openssl's internal prng. so i
patched my solaris 8 system to provide a /dev/random /dev/urandom. i
thought that these would be
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Matthew Ruzicka wrote:
Pardon my possible ignorance here, but has anyone come up with any good
work arounds for getting mod_ssl to work with the (patched) Apache 1.3.26
since 2.8.8-1.3.24 only wants to work with 1.3.24?
I'm looking into it.
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Matthew Ruzicka wrote:
Pardon my possible ignorance here, but has anyone come up with any good
work arounds for getting mod_ssl to work with the (patched) Apache 1.3.26
since 2.8.8-1.3.24 only wants to work with 1.3.24?
I assume a new version of mod_ssl will be on its
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, James Bromberger wrote:
Seems that the current 2.8.8 has some problems patching into some of
the mod_proxy code:
./ap/Makefile.tmpl.rej
./modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c.rej
./modules/proxy/proxy_http.c.rej
h... wonder why I didn't notice those before? Sigh. Anyway,
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Tim Tassonis wrote:
It seem like due to his various other commitments, RSE is not really
active on mod_ssl anymore. Is there a plan to transfer maintainership of
mod_ssl to somebody else?
For 2.0, it's already been transferred to the ASF. 1.3 is maintenance
mode only,
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Zac Hillier wrote:
The configure line reads:
./configure --with-ssl=/home/wserve/_s-store/openssl-0.9.6c --enable-ssl --e
nable-mods-all=shared --prefix=/usr/local/apache2
Is that the path to the source code distribution directory or the install
directory? It should be
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Zac Hillier wrote:
Just recently, eventually got apache 2.0.36 installed with mod_ssl.
Now when I try to start apache with:
httpd -D SSL
I get an error:
Cannot load modules/mod_ssl.so into server : modules/mod_ssl.so: undefined
symbol : X509_free
That's a
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Zac Hillier wrote:
Can you help? I'm trying to install apache 2.0.36 with mod_ssl and having
real trouble I have re-installed a couple of times now once specifically
with --enable-ssl=shared and once with --enable-shared=all each time the
mod_ssl does not appear to
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
BTW- I originally put in the 'deny from all' and 'satisfy any' lines
because I had another line 'allow from .my-domain.com' inbetween them
at one point. Which makes me wonder, what would I do if I wanted to
put it back in?
Ah, forgot to respond
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Jeff Landers wrote:
What is the recommended way of getting the ssl module for Apache2? Using
the built in Apache2 SSL or using mod_ssl? I don't see a mod_ssl for
Apache2 on the mod_ssl site. Does anyone have experience with Apache2
and ssl?
There's no mod_ssl on the
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Andre Steffens wrote:
I've installed Apache 2.0.36 with mod_ssl on Win2k. After I create a
certificate I now have the files test.cert and test.key.
But the Apache doesn't start! Someone who know what I've to do?
What does the error log say?
--Cliff
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Jeff Landers wrote:
Thank you for the info. I will work on debugging but here is another
question. Why, when ssl and apache are under /usr/local, is vhosts.c
still under the source code directory? This seems more like a
compilation problem although I have compiled it a
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Jeff Landers wrote:
./bin/apachectl startssl [Mon Jun 10 10:19:51 2002] [crit] [Mon Jun 10
10:19:51 2002] file vhost.c, line 232, assertion rv == APR_SUCCESS
failed Abort - core dumped ./bin/apachectl startssl: httpd could not be
started
That means the call to
.
--Cliff
PS: If you can wait a few days, 2.0.37 will hopefully be out and it has
some important bugs fixed. Just so you know.
---
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache HTTP Server Project
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Don wrote:
./configure \
--with-apxs[=/path/to/apache/bin/apxs] \
--with-ssl=/path/to/openssl
Is the first option the path to the httpd binary (httpd) or the config
file (httpd.conf)?
Neither. It's the path to apxs. :) apxs is a script that usually sits
in
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SSLRequireSSL
DirectoryIndex index.wp2
AddHandler cgi-script .cgi
Options +ExecCGI
deny from all
AuthType Basic
AuthUserFile /yadda/yadda/path/to/site/root/admin/.htpasswd
AuthName Administrative Pages
require valid-user
satisfy any
BUT, I
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW- I originally put in the 'deny from all' and 'satisfy any' lines
because I had another line 'allow from .my-domain.com' inbetween them
at one point. Which makes me wonder, what would I do if I wanted to
put it back in?
Ah, forgot to respond
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Ekkehard Ellmann LRT1 wrote:
Running make in apache 1.3.24 gave a compile-error in
apache_1.3.24/src/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_vars.c
The compiler pointed at the line:
{ UID, NID_uniqueIdentifier },
(linux-2.2.17, apache-1.3.24, mod_ssl-2.8.8-1.3.24,
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
Ummm ... I had generally been using 0.9.7-dev CVS with mod_ssl without any
great grief for some time.
Hm. Okay, well, you're luckier than the httpd committer who tried it.
:) At least with Apache 2.0, many things have been rumored to break under
the
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
oh yeah, there's also that security problem with modssl that I mentioned
ages ago - AFAIK this still hasn't been changed in modssl and *may* not
yet have changed in apache 2.0 either. Ralf or David, please correct me
if I'm wrong;
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Chris Hsiang wrote:
[30/May/2002 17:31:17 05760] [error] Init: PassPhraseDialog BuiltIn not
supported in server private key from file
F:/Apache/Apache2/conf/ssl/secure.key (OpenSSL library error follows)
It means you can't use SSLPassPhraseDialog BuiltIn on Win32.
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Patrick Dionisio wrote:
Currently, I have a client script that generates n
number of requests to the apache server. The page it
requests is a static page. With SSL turned on, I'm
only able to get at most 7 to 8 requests per second.
With SSL turned off, I am able to
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Petryczka, George wrote:
My apache make fails with:
Error: Cannot load flex.
I never heard of flex. Is this just a fancy lex? Can i substitute lex for
flex in the makefile? I'm on HPUX11.0.
Else can i download flex from somewhere?
fast lex. It's GNU's lex. But
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Petryczka, George wrote:
Won't touching those files cause some component not to be built?
And thanks.
Nope. They're generated files distributed along with mod_ssl. If somehow
their timestamps get to be older than the .y and .l files they came from,
the Makefile will
regular lex, and ssl_expr_scan.l *might* actually
use them.)
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Petryczka, George wrote:
Can a httpd be set up as a secure proxy? Ie.: forward requests from a
client (a client that doesn't get involved with any ssl stuff itself) on
to an HTTPS site?
Yes. With Apache 1.3 / mod_ssl 2.8.x, you _might_ have to enable
SSL_EXPERIMENTAL
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Peter Viertel wrote:
make certificate does not work in apache 2 yet.
IIRC, the official consensus on the httpd dev list was that will NOT
support make certificate in Apache 2.x at all, with the reasoning that
test certificates just tend to confuse people who don't know
:
make certificate TYPE=custom?
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Ted Bannon wrote:
I've been trying to make use of the SSLSessionCache shared memory option in
my Apache config:
#SSLSessionCacheshmht:/data/home/apache/1.3.24/logs/ssl_scache(512000)
#SSLSessionCacheshmcb:/data/home/apache/1.3.24/logs/ssl_scache(512000)
to ask these on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd answer them
myself but I don't know the answers. The optional
function ssl_lookup_var() would probbly help out though.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
mutex lock
This is a known bug that should be fixed in a few days. Please see
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8124
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:51:04PM +0100, Noel O'Kelly wrote:
We have a report of a problem from 2.8.6 onwards due to a change in the
seeding of the PRNG which halves the
performance of SSL requests. Any update on this ???
Hi, here's the fix we're
on that...)
Bummer, yeah, that's a kind of nasty one. We're trying to figure out a
clean way to get around that problem, but haven't gotten anything in yet.
Glad you got it.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED
(released today) and use
that. SHMCB is now fixed.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Johannes Artur Bertscheit wrote:
Is it planned to test the next release 2.0.36 on windows / support it
for windows including SSL-ProxyPass?
Current release schedule has 2.0.36 coming out on Monday. Win32 binaries
will be provided and are well-supported. BUT: official
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Mads Toftum wrote:
Yes, that is the one -
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/modules/ssl/ssl_scache_shmcb.c
The next version of apache2 should be tagged in the tree - a new release
is probably not too far away.
Yep. SHMCB was totally messed up in 2.0.35.
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Aryeh Katz wrote:
make sure that ssleay and libeay are both in the path.
Um, or libssl and libcrypto from openssl (in the library path, that is).
ssleay's getting to be pretty old these days. :)
__
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Aryeh Katz wrote:
poster specified a win32 environment, ssleay32.dll is one of the two
openssl libs on win32.
Ah missed that. Sorry. :)
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Johannes Artur Bertscheit wrote:
and I tried to compile the soruces with Visual C++ 6.0 without success
(strange compilation errors occured).
Which errors? You do realize that you need sed installed to compile it,
right? See http://apr.apache.org/compiling_win32.html
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now if if I enter this
http://server/www/index.php
I get to the same location and it is not SSL secured
So my question is can you turn off access to http?
See the SSLRequireSSL directive. Or you might want to set up a Redirect
so that the
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, R. DuFresne wrote:
Would this not still leave port 80 open and bound?
It would, yes.
Is not just removing the port delcarations for 80 and only having 443
set better and perhaps more secure?
That's a case-by-case decision. In some cases, it would be insufficiently
at runtime.
Solution: use a shared OpenSSL.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache HTTP Server Project
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl
price.
Good luck,
Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the issues with using a newer mod_ssl with an older apache?
First of all, it would be difficult to get the patches to apply without
heavy manual assistance.
I need to use Apache 1.3.12 for a project and am wondering if I can use
the
they're not
out-of-date. Do this:
cd httpd-2.0/modules/ssl
touch ssl_expr_scan.c
touch ssl_expr_parse.c
touch ssl_expr_parse.h
Then it should work fine.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache HTTP Server Project
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, R. DuFresne wrote:
Lookin at it now. So, are compile directives pretty much the same, as for
pointing at the ssl source and mm source trees? The docs are not as clear
on this as Ralf has them in the mod-ssl structures smile.
Look at ./configure --help for starters.
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Mads Toftum wrote:
Given that this is probably the same problem as we have seen with the
old mod_ssl - my guess is more like a broken tar that resets timestamps.
That could explain some of it. But I feel like there might be something
else going on too, because...
But I
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, R. DuFresne wrote:
I've found this, do I point at the openssl dir I have the all the sub dirs
and bins installed in, or to the source tree they were compiled from?
The install dir's prefix. So, for example, if your OpenSSL is in /usr/lib
and /usr/include/openssl, then
bundled with Apache 2.0. Just download the .zip or the
.msi from http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/ and openssl from
http://www.openssl.org/ if you don't already have it and that's all you
need.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache HTTP Server Project
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, R. DuFresne wrote:
When is apache 2.0 coming out of beta and into primetime?
How did you manage to miss the party? :) It went GA last week with the
release of 2.0.35.
--Cliff
__
Apache Interface to
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache HTTP Server Project
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
else who's interested but missed it, it
just recently became available online at linux-mag.com./shameless plug
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache HTTP Server Project
in. It
remained available only with --enable-rule=SSL_EXPERIMENTAL up until
version 2.5.0.]
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache
.
This is a known issue with mod_ssl for Apache 2.0... it's on the
modules/ssl/TODO list.
Thanks,
Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache HTTP Server Project
development team that listen in on modssl-users for potential
bugs, so in my mind it makes sense to keep the user group as one.
But that's just me... if you guys disagree, then go right ahead and create
a new list.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Steve Gonzales wrote:
One list is enough for me. SSL theory doesn't change from 1.3.xx to
2.0.xx; only the configuration and installation changes.
And even that is mostly the same. :)
--
Cliff Woolley
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
... it will have been
signed by some root CA (is Thawte the only one that actually provides this
service? Maybe Verisign does, I don't know.), and you'll see the special
capabilities flags in there as well.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
and the new version to
me?
Thanks,
Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache HTTP Server Project
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl
to
me?
Thanks,
Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache HTTP Server Project
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache HTTP Server Project
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED
?
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache HTTP Server Project
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing
a good
plan...
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache HTTP Server Project
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
But if you're in a huge hurry and absolutely can't wait, you can use the
--force parameter to mod_ssl's configure script.
Just to be clear: this method is NOT recommended. If you can wait for the
next version, I strongly urge you to do so. [In other
--
Cliff Woolley
Apache HTTP Server Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List
(or upgrade to a newer Apache ;).
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
Apache HTTP Server Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl
, which is different from mod_ssl, meaning that
this is not the right forum to answer your question. You need to ask this
question on the Apache-SSL support forum instead. See
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ (or you could use mod_ssl instead, then we
could help you. :-)
Hope this helps,
--Cliff Woolley
--
Cliff Woolley
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED
I've been seeing duplicate deliveries of messages to the list from
mmx.engelschall.com for the last few days... Ralf, can you check on this
when you get a chance?
Thanks,
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED
and
(b) run correctly. The safest bet by far is to just wait on the new
version of mod_ssl to be released.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Apache
in advance for any answers.
What kind of session cache are you using?
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Yu, Ming wrote:
I use dbm as session cache.
Try an shm session cache and see what happens.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Kevin McQuiggin wrote:
I want to create a dummy self-signed certificate. Despite the Apache
documentation, make certificate in the top-level source directory doesn't
work. There's no certificate: target in the Makefile
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED
to
rebuild all modules as well.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Antonio Roberto Borges wrote:
I just build everything from scratch,
Well, can you build it with debugging symbols and run it under gdb so you
can give us a backtrace?
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL
support a group ID of -1 (2^32-1 =
4294967295). Change your Group directive to something else, like nobody
perhaps.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List
...
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List
experimentally on this list over the past year or so.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote:
incompatibility between POST and ssl session renegotiations. I remember
when all this got discussed on this list when the problem was first found
and later fixed in mod_ssl for 1.3, but I don't remember the technical
details of what the problem
in the browser and scary-looking dialog boxes pop
up in front of the user.
Make sense?
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache
or configuration problem: C compiler
cannot create executables.
What does config.log say?
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager
one and
disconnected mid-request.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL
://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_dir.html#directoryindex
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List
101 - 200 of 270 matches
Mail list logo
