Re: strange problem with unclean shutdown

2002-02-08 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 07:12:35PM +0100, Andreas Gietl wrote: VirtualHost XXX:443 ServerName www.defaulthost.de ServerAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] DocumentRoot /home/defaulthost/public_html Sorry for the late reply, been on vacation. Does this server host multiple SSL sites? What are

Re: segfault problem - from scratch

2001-10-30 Thread David Rees
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 02:59:14AM -0600, Dean Hall wrote: I'm installing openssl from RPM because several RPMs in RedHat 7.2 require the package -- that's basically it. I wouldn't mind compiling everything from source -- but then I should probably be using FreeBSD. :-) Well, the main issue

Re: segfault problem - from scratch

2001-10-30 Thread David Rees
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 03:39:40PM -0600, Dean Hall wrote: As I said, I guess I'll try that, but I have several problems with RedHat's Apache/mod_ssl RPM. First, I have many scripts which depend on Apache being in /usr/local/apache which is not where the RPM puts apache. Second, and I can

Re: MSIE POST problem

2001-10-24 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 03:47:11PM -0700, Peter Morelli wrote: I've done a little more testing, and it seems like turning OFF the Show friendly http error pages option in MSIE allows apache/mod_ssl to downgrade the connection to HTTP/1.0 correctly. Turning it back on again leads to a

Re: MSIE POST problem

2001-10-24 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 05:38:40PM -0700, Peter Morelli wrote: Sorry, I have the same situation after using those config lines. I had seen them on the mailing list before, but just to be sure I've just retested them. No change. Same symptoms and solutions... And you do have a ssl session

Re: IE 6 and 128bit certificate problem

2001-10-23 Thread David Rees
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 09:49:22AM +0200, Martin B. Nielsen wrote: Does anyone have a clue why ie6 and apache 1.3.19 with mod_ssl 2.8.4 (and openssl 0.9.6a) with a 128bit certificate may refuse to connect to the server (i.e. it shows the typical error screen on ie). The server has the

Re: your mail

2001-10-18 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 04:16:48PM -0300, Carlos M. Chicca wrote: I have compiled and installed apache 1.3.22 , mod_ssl 2.8.5-1.3.22 and openssl-0.9.6b. Everything is ok. But when i start it whith apachectl startssl, after enter the pass phrase it says apachectl startssl: httpd started but

Re: Problem session cache and HTTP headers AOL

2001-09-27 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 10:08:32AM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, now I have more precise data. The samples have been taken during 5 days. There where 10 million acceses to the server. 461 of these had corrupt headers. So increasing Log level is not really feasible. snip of a lot of good

Re: Browser Problems

2001-09-18 Thread David Rees
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 05:25:34PM -0500, Nick Temple wrote: Hi -- My question is: what is the most stable version of Apache / mod_ssl/ OpenSSL and configuration options, stable in this case meaning allowing the widest group of the most common browsers to connect (AOL, IE, Netscape,

Re: Problem serving to some browsers

2001-08-30 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 07:29:03PM +0200, Sergey Samoyloff wrote: BrowserMatch == SetEnvIf User-Agent ? Yes. http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_setenvif.html#BrowserMatch -Dave __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)

Re: Problem serving to some browsers

2001-08-30 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:50:43PM +, James W.Blackwell wrote: The problem persists. :( I've tried several combinations of the BrowserMatch/SetEnvIf lines. Here's what I've got in my config now: Can you try removing the SetEnvIf or BrowserMatch lines completely? It's strange, because

Re: Providing the CGI vars to a servlet or asp

2001-08-08 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 10:57:47AM -0600, Hyrum Mills wrote: I've tried to read the mod_ssl documentation as well as an Apache architectural description and so far have had no luck in finding the answer to my question. I'm working on a research project that's building a trust

Re: Intermittent Page cannot be displayed and Cannot find error or DNS error using mod_ssl and IE 5.5

2001-08-06 Thread David Rees
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 02:32:36PM -0400, Tim Gardner wrote: Carol, In Apache httpd.conf we had to put the line: SSLProtocol all -SSLv3 in order to get it to work for IE Mac. So now when IE windows users who do not have ssl v2 enabled try to hit the site, they get the

Re: Intermittent Page cannot be displayed and Cannot find erro r or DNS error using mod_ssl and IE 5.5

2001-08-06 Thread David Rees
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 05:45:16PM -0500, Kuczborski, Carol L wrote: Our users are using Microsoft IE on Windows platforms, none are on Macintosh. We tried the fix you mentioned, as also noted in the FAQ for mod_ssl under the heading When I connect via HTTPS to an Apache + mod_ssl + OpenSSL

RE: Apache 1.3.20/ModSSL2.8.4/OpenSSL0.9.6b builds but core dumps .

2001-07-27 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] There does appear to be a major problem with building openssl 0.9.6a and b on RedHat 6.2, which I've not got to the bottom of. I have successfully built openssl 0.9.6 from source

RE: Ouch!: malloc failed in malloc_block

2001-07-27 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Stewart I have been chasing down a memory problem for a few days now and would appreciate any pointers you might have. We have an application that allows for uploads of large (50MB) files. We

RE: Apache 1.3.20/ModSSL2.8.4/OpenSSL0.9.6b builds but core dumps.

2001-07-26 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have been having serious difficulties with getting openssl 0.9.6b to even build on RedHat 6.2. So much so that I'm considering moving to 7.1. Just last week RedHat posted an

RE: stickiness - SSL session ID (was cisco 11155 load balancer problems)

2001-07-20 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of B. Burke I have been testing with a Cisco CSS using SSL session ID for balancing, and have yet to experience the problem described below. As best I can tell, it works ok with IE5.5 Netscape 4.5.

RE: A problem with MAC Internet Explorer and modssl 2.8.1 openssl 0.96

2001-07-20 Thread David Rees
1. Please post in plain text instead of HTML. 2. Try these settings instead of the SetEnvIf User-Agent *MSIE*... in your SSL virtual host. BrowserMatch MSIE [1-4] nokeepalive \ ssl-unclean-shutdown downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 BrowserMatch MSIE [5-9] ssl-unclean-shutdown -Dave

RE: Ultimate BrowserMatch List (second try)

2001-07-18 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrea Cerrito What about: SetEnvIf User-Agent MSIE [1-4] nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 SetEnvIf User-Agent MSIE [5-9] ssl-unclean-shutdown Make sure those are

RE: Reverse Proxy SSL

2001-07-11 Thread David Rees
#3. People who have done it are too busy to reply. I've done it before to get mod_gzip working under mod_ssl. Unfortunately, I don't have a sample config handy. Search the mod_gzip archives and you should find your answer. -Dave -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Fine-tuning Apache and mod_ssl

2001-07-10 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mads Toftum On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 07:20:41PM +0800, Thum Chee Weng, Ronnie wrote: what would be a good figure to start using shm ? Default figure is 512000. That depends on your OS and how busy

RE: Use SSL 3.0 checked but not 2.0

2001-07-10 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Gardner Dave, Use this: SSLProtocol all BrowserMatch MSIE nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 This did not work. IE 5.0 Mac gave 'data encryption errors'.

RE: Use SSL 3.0 checked but not 2.0

2001-07-09 Thread David Rees
Use this: SSLProtocol all BrowserMatch MSIE nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP ^^ Notice that you should have !EXPORT56 configured, !EXP56 does not work. -Dave

RE: Netscape + ModSSL=Dead slow.

2001-06-20 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of WSO Support Does solving this problem with sweeping wildcard BrowserMatch statements adversely affect the functionality of Apache and ModSSL? No. Everything will function fine. What I getting at

RE: Netscape + ModSSL=Dead slow.

2001-06-20 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DAve Goodrich OK, that went faster than expected. I clean-installed Netscape from several sources, below are the text strings recorded in the apache log for each Netscape version I tested. I can

RE: Netscape + ModSSL=Dead slow.

2001-06-20 Thread David Rees
IfDefine SSL AddType application/x-x509-ca-cert .crt AddType application/x-pkcs7-crl.crl VirtualHost 192.168.3.11:443 DocumentRoot /usr/local/www/secure ServerName www.rblc.com php_value session.cache_limiter

RE: Ultimate BrowserMatch List (was: Netscape + ModSSL=Dead slow.)

2001-06-20 Thread David Rees
At one time I had to add this to the end of my BrowserMatch list for SSL: BrowserMatch WebTV !ssl-unclean-shutdown WebTV browsers are based on MSIE, and they don't seem to like the ssl-unclean-shutdown option for some reason. I don't know if this is still the case. -Dave -Original

RE: KeepAlive and IE, again...

2001-06-08 Thread David Rees
I've been using these settings: SetEnvIf User-Agent MSIE [1-4] nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 SetEnvIf User-Agent MSIE [5-9] ssl-unclean-shutdown and it seems to do the trick (keeping the fingers crossed) The difference for my app

RE: KeepAlive and IE, again...

2001-06-08 Thread David Rees
Hi, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Geoff Thorpe There's also the other angle too: any old x86 with a tcp/ip stack and a modem can open a few (hundred) connections to your server and keep reconnecting whenever they're

RE: KeepAlive and IE, again...

2001-06-07 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McCaffity, Ray Typically these sites don't run SSL on the server. It's terminated at the switch hardware, many net gear vendors have SSL accelerators that emulate a connection to the server. The end

RE: KeepAlive and IE, again...

2001-06-07 Thread David Rees
Hi, I haven't had a chance to test it, but how about this? BrowserMatch MSIE [1-4] nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 This would allow all MSIE 5.X browsers to connect normally. But even those may need this: BrowserMatch MSIE 5 ssl-unclean-shutdown Of course,

RE: Netscape + ModSSL=Dead slow.

2001-05-31 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DAve Goodrich Maybe.. but the Netscape I'm testing works perfectly with Amazon, ebay, BN, etc etc etc. I've tried with Win2k servers, Solaris, Stronghold, all work fine. Anyone have a mod_ssl

RE: Netscape + ModSSL=Dead slow.

2001-05-31 Thread David Rees
Of course ;^) Our web app is built around PHP+CPDF+GD+Openlink, to get everything to compile without errors I can't use bleeding edge releases. I'm running Apache 1.2.13 and PHP 4.0.0 because they are rock solid for me. CPDF and GD compile best against PHP 4.0.0, and Openlink compiles best

RE: R: Problems with IE and SSL

2001-05-09 Thread David Rees
Hi, Can you try changing these two lines: # What Ciphers are allowed #SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXP56:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP:+eNULL SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!RC4-MD5:!EXP-DES-CBC-SHA:!EXP-RC4-MD5:!EXPORT56:!EXP56:R C4+RSA:+HI GH:+MEDIUM:+LOW:+SSLv2:+EXP:+eNULL #

RE: R: Problems with IE and SSL

2001-05-09 Thread David Rees
Yes. https://www.centromultimediale.it I'll post a zip file to test the download. I'll repost on this mail asap. Do you think that using Pragma: no-cache can cause this beavior? I found on MS site that IE can have problems on temp saving any file you try to download over SSL... :( I'll

RE: Strange problem with IE5.0 and SSLv3

2001-05-03 Thread David Rees
Well, if it doesn't like them inside of the virtual host, put them outside. ;-) -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erik Boles Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 7:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Strange problem with IE5.0 and

RE: Strange problem with IE5.0 and SSLv3

2001-05-02 Thread David Rees
Can you post your entire mod_ssl configuration? This is difficult to diagnose without seeing. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erik Boles I have read several FAQ's and done some research regarding the problem IE 5.0 has with

RE: Strange problem with IE5.0 and SSLv3

2001-05-02 Thread David Rees
-Agent .*MSIE.* nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown CustomLog /var/log/httpd/ssl_request_log \ %t %h %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SSL_CIPHER}x \%r\ %b /VirtualHost -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Rees Sent: Wednesday, May 02

RE: Strange problem with IE5.0 and SSLv3

2001-05-02 Thread David Rees
You should be able to do something like this assuming that Windows has dbm support: SSLSessionCache dbm:c:/apache/ssl_cache SSLSessionCacheTimeout 600 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:42

RE: mod_jrun

2001-05-02 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Diana Shepard I've successfully built Apache 1.3.12 with mod_ssl 2.6.4-1.3.12 and OpenSSL via the JOE AVERAGE mod_ssl INSTALL instructions. That INSTALL document says You...get no intermediate

RE: modssl performance

2001-05-02 Thread David Rees
We're going to need more details on what software you're using. But based on my experiments, the item to make the biggest change in performance is the version of OpenSSL that you're using, and how it's compiled. You need to make sure that you're using a recent version of OpenSSL (preferably

Re: Apache mod_ssl and openssl - I messed up

2001-04-09 Thread David Rees
There's a better way than all of these. ;-) Check out cronolog, it'll automatically rotate files for you on either a daily, monthly or yearly basis so you don't have to HUP the server yourself after moving the log files.. http://www.ford-mason.co.uk/resources/cronolog/ -Dave On Mon, Apr 09,

Re: Successful build with perl-5.00503-12

2001-04-07 Thread David Rees
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:15:16AM -0700, Tony Hunter wrote: I've been able to build apache_1.3.19/mod_ssl-2.8.2 on a RedHat 6.2 system with the perl rpm version above. The modssl docs tell me perl 5.60 is *required*. Am I missing any functionality or likely to encounter problems staying

Re: SSL handshake interrupted

2001-04-06 Thread David Rees
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 05:52:44AM -0400, kreso wrote: I have seen this error reported many times in the archive, but not really solved. Is it solved? We are using mod_ssl/2.6.6 openssl 0.9.6.a Apache 1.3.19 We get this error: [Thu Apr 5 02:25:00 2001] [error] mod_ssl: SSL handshake

Re: Mixed use of SSL/non-SSL

2001-04-06 Thread David Rees
You need to redirect them to https if they're connecting on port 80. This was discussed in detail a little while back, check the list archives. Something simple like: Redirect /securedir https://myserver/securedir Should do the trick for you. -Dave On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 12:27:30PM +0200,

RE: SSL handshake interrupted

2001-04-06 Thread David Rees
What versions of MSIE, and what are the exact problems you are experiencing? -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of kreso Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 4:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SSL handshake interrupted Hello,

RE: SSL handshake interrupted

2001-04-06 Thread David Rees
It really sounds like keepalive is turned on. Can you verify that keep alive is turned off? Disable keepalive for the entire server if need be. I'm using MSIE 5.50.4522.1800 (128bit) here, and I've never had problems connecting. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: (seriously) Let's round up the 56-bit browsers

2001-04-04 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:03:39AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A little while ago, I asked the question: which versions of which browsers will be adversely affected by "!EXPORT56"? In other words, who will get a 40-bit connection when they expected a 56-bit connection? I haven't seen as

RE: Problems with IE/56bit (not solved in the FAQ)

2001-04-02 Thread David Rees
The problem seems to be that even with the IE workarounds, MSIE still does not like to connect when using a self-signed certificate. If you go out and buy a certificate, it should work (Verisign has a free trial cert if you just want to test it) -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: Any help for a novice on RH 7.0 / Apache 1.3.14

2001-04-01 Thread David Rees
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 02:17:25PM -0800, Corey Adam Baye wrote: On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Aage J. Skjolingstad wrote: Hi All, When crond is log rotating (crond.weekly) - httpd feil to start up again. I'm running RH 7.0 with Apache/1.3.14 (Unix) (Red-Hat/Linux) mod_ssl/2.7.1

Re: Real impact of IE5/CipherSuite workaround

2001-03-29 Thread David Rees
If you simply take out the !EXPORT56, you'll most likely find is that most likely the same 56-bit IE users now can't connect to the side at all. Take your pick: A warning, or no connection at all. :-( Taking a look at the Thawte site and their FAQ about Super Certs, it seems that you can

Re: Real impact of IE5/CipherSuite workaround

2001-03-29 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 08:47:29AM -0800, David Rees wrote: Taking a look at the Thawte site and their FAQ about Super Certs, it seems that you can disable only these ciphers and get the broken MSIE clients to work: DES-CBC-SHA, DES-CBC-MD5, EDH-RSA-DES-CBC-SHA, EDH-DSS-DES-CBC-SHA

RE: virtual hosts and mod_ssl

2001-03-28 Thread David Rees
You are correct! You can virtual host SSL sites with separate IP addresses just fine. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of George Walsh In my case, I have the option of IP aliasing, so it would seem I simply have to establish a

RE: URL Rewriting in Java over mod_SSL

2001-03-28 Thread David Rees
This is a bug in in jakarta-tomcat, not mod_ssl. It is fixed in the latest beta release, you might want to try that if you can't wait for jakarta-tomcat 3.2.2. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wolle Hello , I have wrote some

RE: URL Rewriting in Java over mod_SSL

2001-03-28 Thread David Rees
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wolle no ,sorry I've installed the know the Tomcat 3.2.2b2 an the same procedure.. But all of that, the dispatcher is much faster when you run the servlet first ;-) David Rees wrote: This is a bug in in jakarta-tomcat, not mod_ssl

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-23 Thread David Rees
? Thanks, max -Original Message- From: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Hi Max, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: virtual host broken pipe

2001-03-23 Thread David Rees
Please read the FAQ. http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html#ToC47 This question comes up so often it should be in the .sig of the list! -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Benjamin Collar Hi, I'm new to ssl and am having

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-23 Thread David Rees
Yeah, for some reason, the mod_perl config/install wasn't passing the EAPI_MM environment variable to Apache for configuration, so Apache didn't know it was available for configuration when building. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf

RE: Apache Bench equivelant for SSL?

2001-03-22 Thread David Rees
Take a look at the program siege, (search on freshmeat.net), it benchmarks web servers over SSL pretty well. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeffrey Burgoyne People; Is anyone aware of a tool like apache bench (ab) for

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-22 Thread David Rees
Hi Max, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Max Clark Hi all. I have been tuning my web farm (for the past 6 months now), and have had the typical MSIE SSL issues along the way. I stumbled across a post today regarding the

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-22 Thread David Rees
Your configuration looks good, but I'm pretty sure that --enable-rule=SSL_EXPERIMENTAL should be part of your APACI_ARGS when configuring mod_perl, not when configuring mod_ssl. Of course, if it works, maybe Ralf moved shmcb out of the SSL_EXPERIMENTAL code? I'll have to look at the source to

RE: https problem - port 443 problem

2001-03-22 Thread David Rees
It sounds like you are not running "apachectl startssl", and just running "apachectl start". Personally, I've found those IfDefine SSL statements a PITA. What I do is replace all IfDefine SSL statements with IfModule mod_ssl.c, except for the ones around the mod_ssl LoadModule and AddModule

RE: https problem - port 443 problem

2001-03-22 Thread David Rees
You definately don't need to be running both sslstart and then start, just running sslstart should start up both http and https servers running on port 80 and 443. You should have these statements in your httpd.conf Port 80 IfDefine SSL Listen 80 Listen 443 /IfDefine If not, something else

RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance?

2001-03-22 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Geoff Thorpe lots of good info snipped Thanks for the lowdown on both session caches, Geoff. It really seems to me that at this point, the shmcb cache should no longer be part of the SSL_EXPERIMENTAL

RE: Apache Bench equivelant for SSL?

2001-03-22 Thread David Rees
on-line systems. stunnell seems workable. Year end hours must make my brain fuzzy because I should have thought of that. I also considered putting SSL into the ab program itself. It doesn't actually look that hard to do. Jeff On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, David Rees wrote: Take a look

Re: IE 4 problem

2001-03-16 Thread David Rees
Did you read the FAQ or search the mail archives? Your question is answered multiple times. http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html#ToC49 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modsslr=1w=2 -Dave On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 10:18:44AM -0500, Joel Helbling wrote: I am using mod_ssl

RE: web server errors

2001-03-16 Thread David Rees
This looks very much like the standard MSIE IO exceptions. Here's how to fix it: http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html#ToC49 -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 8:15 AM To:

Re: [BugDB] MSIE 5.x connection failure timing issue (PR#528)

2001-03-12 Thread David Rees
Do you also have a SSLSessionCache defined? Many MSIE clients will break without it. -Dave On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 03:41:04PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Martin Dickau Version: 2.7.2.2 OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (216.57.24.244) We are experiencing an MSIE

Re: Mod-ssl and Security certs on MSIE

2001-03-10 Thread David Rees
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 09:35:25AM +, Jonathan Shahariw wrote: On certain versons of MSIE (ie, 5.0) The browser cant find a connection with the server but with netscape it works?? What could be the cause? Did you read the FAQ? http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.6/ssl_faq.html#ToC48 -Dave

Re: Mod-ssl and Security certs on MSIE

2001-03-10 Thread David Rees
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 11:00:57AM +0100, Mads Toftum wrote: On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 09:35:25AM +, Jonathan Shahariw wrote: On certain versons of MSIE (ie, 5.0) The browser cant find a connection with the server but with netscape it works?? What could be the cause? See the FAQ:

Re: SSL Doesn't work

2001-03-03 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 02:16:54PM +, Malay Shah wrote: Hi, I'm using modssl 2.8.0 and apache 1.3.17 with php 4.0.4pl1 and SSL doesn't work. Port 443 is open and Apache is configured properly but it has something to do with PHP because when I remove the PHP module, everything works

Re: Most common setup?

2001-03-03 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:46:45AM -0500, Dan Delaney wrote: Hi all. What is the most common setup for having a normal server and a secure server on the same machine? Should I just have one instance of Apache running with a virtual domain that handles the https:// connections? or should I

Re: SSL Doesn't work

2001-03-03 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 02:16:54PM +, Malay Shah wrote: Hi, I'm using modssl 2.8.0 and apache 1.3.17 with php 4.0.4pl1 and SSL doesn't work. Port 443 is open and Apache is configured properly but it has something to do with PHP because when I remove the PHP module, everything works

RE: AW: SSL v3 works with IE5.x on Apple Macintosh?

2001-02-27 Thread David Rees
Chris, If you don't have a SSLSessionCache defined, some versions of MSIE WILL break. This Mac that you're using is probably one of them. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christian Jrges Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 10:27

RE: libssl.so.0 - cannot open shared object file - solution

2001-02-27 Thread David Rees
Interesting. I usually use the default options when compiling OpenSSL (./config ; make ; make test), I guess this results in OpenSSL not building the shared libraries in the first place. Then when mod_ssl gets built, it links with the static libraries. I think that you could specify the

RE: Could mod_ssl and OpenSSl be running on another computer?

2001-02-27 Thread David Rees
It could be done using mod_proxy, although I've never done it myself. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could apache be running on a computer, while mod_ssl,OpenSSL running on another? How to do it? It's

Re: Problem

2001-02-25 Thread David Rees
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 07:50:01PM -0700, The Doctor wrote: I am using FreeBSD 4.2 with apache 1.3.17 + mod_ssl 2.8.0 et al. lynx-ssl can see the site http://seucre.bigbenhosting.com but not netscep or MSIE. I do a debug and get the following: snip I tried connecting with Netscape

RE: confused about ca signing.

2001-02-22 Thread David Rees
Are you using Netscape? Did you check the FAQ? http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.6/ssl_faq.html#ToC49 -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tc lewis Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 6:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

RE: confused about ca signing.

2001-02-22 Thread David Rees
signing. so if i have 2 sites under the same second-level domain name, i can't switch back and forth between them in netscape without clearing the cert each time? that kind of sucks. -tcl. On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, David Rees wrote: Are you using Netscape? Did you check the FAQ

RE: Troubles with IE

2001-02-22 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alexander Burke snip Also, I scrubbed the mod_ssl FAQ and found this gem, which seemed to pinpoint the issue to a tee: http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.3/ssl_faq.html#io-ie I reconfigured Apache as

RE: Solved: Intermittent Data Encryption Error on IE or Network IOError on Netscape

2001-02-22 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Morrill Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 5:41 PM I revisited the FAQ and re-reread the list archives. I tried a few things. A few things from the FAQ actually made things worse! :) Can you

RE: Solved: Intermittent Data Encryption Error on IE or Network IOError on Netscape

2001-02-22 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alexander Burke Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 6:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Solved: Intermittent "Data Encryption Error" on IE or "Network IOError" on Netscape Blast! That Ctrl-E

RE: Stupid questions

2001-02-22 Thread David Rees
A few observations: At http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.7/ssl_faq.html#io-ie, the use of !EXPORT56 is suggested to pacify IE. However, at http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.7/ssl_reference.html#ToC9, EXPORT56 is not listed, but EXP56 is. The output of: openssl ciphers -v

RE: httpd not installing

2001-02-15 Thread David Rees
I solved the problem with some debugging, but I'd still like to know why the problem occurred. Anyone have a clue? snip Have I found a bug of some kind? Or have I done something wrong? Apache is now running with mod_ssl, but I'd sure like to know why I had to jump through these hoops.

RE: RE: SSL-induced loading errors

2001-02-13 Thread David Rees
Hi Geoff, Thanks for the info, should help future users. -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Geoff Fowler Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 9:47 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: RE: SSL-induced loading errors Hi Dave,

RE: RE: RE: RE: SSL-induced loading errors

2001-02-12 Thread David Rees
isign Requires?"We're not requiring anything on the server side 'except' the certificate request file? -Original Message----- From: David Rees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 4:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ralf S. Engelschall Subject: RE: RE: R

RE: standard shutdown

2001-02-09 Thread David Rees
http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html#ToC48 -Dave -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matthias PreiszlSent: Friday, February 09, 2001 6:59 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: standard shutdown can anybody solve my problem?

RE: SSL-induced loading errors

2001-02-09 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Kestner Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 9:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SSL-induced loading errors (mod_ssl 2.8.0-1.3.17 on Unix) I'm getting desperate -- the site rolls out today. I'm

RE: RE: SSL-induced loading errors

2001-02-09 Thread David Rees
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can you post the config for your SSL virtual host without comments? Actually, I just tried adding: SSLRequire %{SSL_CIPHER} = 128 And it appears to work on just about every new and old browser/platform! Hope this helps some future newbie... Even on non-128

RE: RE: RE: SSL-induced loading errors

2001-02-09 Thread David Rees
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Kestner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Actually, I just tried adding: SSLRequire %{SSL_CIPHER} = 128 And it appears to work on just about every new and old browser/platform! Hope this helps

RE: RE: RE: RE: SSL-induced loading errors

2001-02-09 Thread David Rees
Curious, according to the docs, it shouldn't allow those browsers to connect. Are you using one of the step-up certificates from Verisign? So I'm told by the guy who acquired our certificates from Verisign. How do I tell? I'm not sure, does anyone else know? Do you also have the

RE: MSIE Woes..

2001-02-08 Thread David Rees
What version(s) of MSIE? Is the server publicly accessible? Are MSIE users actually reporting problems, or do you just see this messages in the log? Will you try with "SSLProtocol all" instead of "SSLProtocol all -SSLv3"? -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: error 2 and strange errors occuring with mod_ssl

2001-02-07 Thread David Rees
Why are you building with such an old version of mod_ssl/Apache? More than likely, the version of OpenSSL you are using (0.9.5a) is not compatible with mod_ssl 2.4.10. Can you use the latest versions of each? Apache 1.3.17, mod_ssl 2.8.0 and OpenSSL 0.9.6? Otherwise you'll have to find out

RE: error 2 and strange errors occuring with mod_ssl

2001-02-07 Thread David Rees
it to 1.3.17. From: "David Rees" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 13:46:26 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: error 2 and strange errors occuring with mod_ssl Why are you building with such an old version of mod_ssl/Apache? More tha

Re: Apache, OpenSSL and Internet Explorer

2001-02-03 Thread David Rees
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 03:47:02PM -0600, James Hastings-Trew wrote: I am trying to establish a secure server using Apache on RedHat 7. I am using OpenSSL 0.9.5a (the most current RPM available at RedHat) I have tried the various Apache httpd.conf tricks noted at:

Re: Apache, OpenSSL and Internet Explorer

2001-02-03 Thread David Rees
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 04:36:07PM -0600, James Hastings-Trew wrote: Thank you for your help. :) I am happy to say, that I *finally* managed to get the silly thing working, and I am going home now to nurse my aching head and sour stomach (nasty cold bug going around). The thing that did the

RE: Problem with IE IE 5.01SP1 with apache 1.3.24/openssl 0.9.5a/mod_ssl 2.7.1-3 (RH7.0)

2001-02-02 Thread David Rees
Check the FAQ, and let us know if you still have problems: http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html#ToC48 -Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ACroft Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 10:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL

Re: Apache/1.3.14 (Win32) mod_jk mod_ssl/2.7.2 OpenSSL/0.9.6 running... ??

2001-01-28 Thread David Rees
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 12:20:44AM +0100, Jan Dries wrote: Oops, I just typed the version number from the original mail. Anyway, when I built the new 2.7.1 (tarball from www.modssl.org/source/mod_ssl-2.7.1-1.3.14.tar.gz) on a clean Apache 1.3.14 (tarball from the Apache

Re: Apache/1.3.14 (Win32) mod_jk mod_ssl/2.7.2 OpenSSL/0.9.6 running... ??

2001-01-28 Thread David Rees
Whoa, just realized that I posted to a message that just got to my mailbox 10 days late. Was there some issue which prevented some mails to the list from being distributed in a reasonable time frame? -Dave On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 12:33:14AM -0800, David Rees wrote: On Wed, Jan 17, 2001

  1   2   3   >