RE: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8

2002-10-28 Thread John . Airey
You'll find the source RPM on the source CD for Red Hat 8.0. Install it as any normal package (eg rpm -ivh), and you'll find the spec file that built the binary in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS. As Geoff points out, it is unusual that Red Hat 8.0 uses a separate package name, but Red Hat have been doing

Re: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8

2002-10-28 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about RE: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8: the apache package name disappears and is called httpd instead. I guess they are synchronising the names of the packages to match the daemon names, although I haven't yet checked to see if bind has become named

RE: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8

2002-10-28 Thread John . Airey
Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Theories of evolution are like buses - there'll be another one along in a minute -Original Message- From: Nadav Har'El [mailto:nyh;math.technion.ac.il] Sent: 28 October 2002 10:26 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8

Re: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8

2002-10-25 Thread Geoff Thorpe
Hi, On Friday 25 Oct 2002 1:30 pm, Mike Pacheco wrote: Hi All, Been on the mod_ssl site from top to bottom and I can not find mod_ssl for apache 2.0.40 - I do a custom install of RedHat 8.0 - pick httpd and mod_ssl and then query the installed packages after it finishes and I test apache

Re: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8

2002-10-25 Thread Geoff Thorpe
sigh On Friday 25 Oct 2002 2:01 pm, I wrote: Anyway, if you get the Apache2 source code, (a tarball from the horse's mouth mouth, or via source RPMs from Redhat or elsewhere), then you ^^^ I am reminded from time to time that perhaps vi might not, after all, be as appropriate for