RE: You don't have to pay (WAS: Why pay a CA?)

2001-01-08 Thread John . Airey
-Original Message- From: Ray M. Erdmann, Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 January 2001 04:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: You don't have to pay (WAS: Why pay a CA?) But this URL states it does cost? http://secure.globalsign.net/en/request/server/ Unless the words

RE: You don't have to pay (WAS: Why pay a CA?)

2001-01-02 Thread Ray M. Erdmann, Jr
But this URL states it does cost? http://secure.globalsign.net/en/request/server/ Unless the words "175 Euro" mean "free" in English? Ray -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Balazs Nagy Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2000 2:17 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: You don't have to pay (WAS: Why pay a CA?)

2001-01-02 Thread Balazs Nagy
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Ray M. Erdmann, Jr wrote: But this URL states it does cost? http://secure.globalsign.net/en/request/server/ Unless the words "175 Euro" mean "free" in English? The first year at least was free when I last looked, I actually didn't notice that it was only the 1st year.

Re: You don't have to pay (WAS: Why pay a CA?)

2000-12-31 Thread Balazs Nagy
On 6 Dec 2000, Eric Rescorla wrote: Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Any other reason browsers would favor a bigname ripoff CA over companies owns? Are their any CA's that charge a more reasonable rate (like $10) for the puny task of running a short program over data already provided