RE: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8

You'll find the source RPM on the source CD for Red Hat 8.0. Install it as any normal package (eg rpm -ivh), and you'll find the spec file that built the binary in /usr/src/redhat/SPECS. As Geoff points out, it is unusual that Red Hat 8.0 uses a separate package name, but Red Hat have been doing

Re: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8

On Mon, Oct 28, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about RE: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8: the apache package name disappears and is called httpd instead. I guess they are synchronising the names of the packages to match the daemon names, although I haven't yet checked to see if bind has become named. No, it

RE: mod_ssl-2.0.40-8

I wasn't just surprised, I was confused. I was looking all over for the apache package! I've only had a brief dabble into 8.0, but will have to consider it if and when our apache servers start to get any heavier load. My last attempt at Apache 2.0 ended in disaster regardless of whether I used an

How to run SSL and Non-SSL pages with same daemon...

Hello, I am upgrading to the Apache Httpd 2.0 web server from 1.3.x and cannot find any Apache-SSL package, so I'm assuming that SSL support is now only done through mod_ssl in httpd-2.0. I compiled it with openssl support and it appears ready to go, but I've got a question. I've got

Re: How to run SSL and Non-SSL pages with same daemon...

maybe let your httpd for your non-ssl pages, and do a virtualhost on port 443 to handle ssl pages or one Vhost for port 80 and one Vhost for 443 Mike Smith wrote: Hello, I am upgrading to the Apache Httpd 2.0 web server from 1.3.x and cannot find any Apache-SSL package, so I'm assuming

shm support for Itanium

Hello All, While trying to run apache in Windows on an Itanium (in compatibility mode no less), I ran into the following error: === SSLSessionCache: Invalid argument: size has to be = 8192 bytes === However, the directives in question

mod_speling with mod_ssl?

Has anyone have any success in getting mod_speling to operate with mod_ssl for version mod_ssl-2.8.11-1.3.27? I configured mod_ssl with --enable-module=speling and when I do a -l on httpd, it shows mod_speling.c is in there but whenever I place CheckSpelling On in a virtual host, apache is

Stronghold and Apache/mod_ssl certificate compatibility

We are planning to replace an outdated copy of Stronghold (Stronghold/2.4.2 Apache/1.3.6 C2NetEU/2410) with Apache 1.3.27/mod_ssl/2.8.12. I created what appears to be a workable httpd.conf for Apache. Accessing http: URLS under Apache works fine. But when trying to access an Apache/modssl https

Re: Stronghold and Apache/mod_ssl certificate compatibility

We were able to pull off this switch this summer SH2.4.2 to Apache 1.3.x-Mod-SSL-2.8.x-OpenSSL-0.9.x using our old certificate/keys Grab the sources and compile, make sure you are using --with-crt and --with-key directives correctly though. It would appear though that you do not have something

Re: Stronghold and Apache/mod_ssl certificate compatibility

Hi, On Monday 28 Oct 2002 2:46 pm, Emily Eileen Witcher wrote: We are planning to replace an outdated copy of Stronghold (Stronghold/2.4.2 Apache/1.3.6 C2NetEU/2410) with Apache 1.3.27/mod_ssl/2.8.12. I created what appears to be a workable httpd.conf for Apache. Accessing http: URLS under

openssl and AES

Hi, Anyone know if openssl supports AES, essentially, does it support RFC 3268, which is AES ciphersuites for TLS, thanks, sunitha __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing

Re: Stronghold and Apache/mod_ssl certificate compatibility

Thanks - It was a missing SSLEngine On directive. I had been using the default Apache configuration file but copied over the virtual hosts verbatim, and Stronghold used SSLFlag On instead. Problem solved! Emily Witcher - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Developer and System Administrator Crytech -