SOLN: Sun Crypto Accelerator Board 1, OpenSSL 0.9.6

2001-10-04 Thread James Bromberger
Hello Everyone, About a month or two ago I was looking for help on the Sun Crypto Board 1 with OpenSSL 0.9.6-engine. My symptoms were that despite installing the Sun kernel drivers, and then building OpenSSL, Mod_SSL, and Apache as described, the card did not seem to be used (no flashy

Re: Sun Crypto Accelerator Board?

2001-05-31 Thread James Bromberger
Ta Geoff, I'll try to fill in the answers below... On Wed, 30 May 2001, Geoff Thorpe wrote: On Wed, 30 May 2001, James Bromberger wrote: chomp I built 0.9.6a-engine under Solaris 8 and have the hardware device configured. Sun ships a library called libswift.so (a link to

Re: Sun Crypto Accelerator Board?

2001-05-31 Thread Geoff Thorpe
Hi there, On Thu, 31 May 2001, James Bromberger wrote: I built 0.9.6a-engine under Solaris 8 and have the hardware device configured. Sun ships a library called libswift.so (a link to libswift.so.5.2.2), along with libraries for Netscape Server (swiftns351.so, swiftns351.so.1) and

Sun Crypto Accelerator Board?

2001-05-30 Thread James Bromberger
I tried posting the following to the openssl-users list, but it seems that my requests for subscription and my post regarding the following issue went into the ether. I'll quote what I wrote earlier, and although this question is more an openssl issue than modssl, I am sure some people here

RE: Sun Crypto Accelerator Board?

2001-05-30 Thread Wohlgemuth, Michael J.
We are using the Sun crypto boards with openssl 0.96a. I just did the speed test and got similar results to yours. I think there must be something wrong with the tests. We aren't using them to speed up SSL so much as to off load the CPU, since it was running at 100% utilization. We don't need

Re: Sun Crypto Accelerator Board?

2001-05-30 Thread Geoff Thorpe
Hi there, On Wed, 30 May 2001, James Bromberger wrote: I tried posting the following to the openssl-users list, but it seems that my requests for subscription and my post regarding the following issue went into the ether. I'll quote what I wrote earlier, and although this question is more