Re: Test::Deep namespace

2003-06-19 Thread Paul Johnson
Fergal Daly said: It's a Test::Builder based testing module, it's designed to replace and enhances Test::More's is_deeply() and eq_set(). is_deeply() has several limitiations like not handling circular references and ignoring the blessedness of references, it also has a few bugs. Sounds a

Re: Binary File Modules

2003-06-19 Thread Matt Seddon
File::Binary::Info? Kake Hmm. That would certainly make sense. I'm not sure about sitting under File::Binary though, since that module deals with much more generic binary mode file access. But File::.*::Info feels like the Right Thing :) File::BinObj::Info? File::BinaryObject::Info? Possibly

Re: Binary File Modules

2003-06-19 Thread Christopher Hicks
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Fergal Daly wrote: At the moment your only module is the PE module and that deals with a binary format but that's not to say that future modules won't deal with ascii formats too. Well ok, you said you'd be focussing on binary formats but some ASCII formats are none too

Re: Test::Deep namespace

2003-06-19 Thread Fergal Daly
On Thursday 19 June 2003 15:24, Andy Lester wrote: It would be nice if the functions ended in _ok, so it's clear that they are actually outputting and not just returning booleans. There is only 1 function really, all the rest are shortcuts to the constructors of various plugins. I suppose I