Re: Getopt::Long wishes (was: RFC: Getopt::Modern)

2005-07-05 Thread Johan Vromans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Johan Vromans) writes: [Quoting Sam Vilain, on June 27 2005, 22:56, in Re: Getopt::Long wis] If passing an array ref first doesn't interfere with the calling convention, then imho you don't need to change the function name. Interfere? No, but elegant? Currently,

Re: Getopt::Long wishes (was: RFC: Getopt::Modern)

2005-07-05 Thread Ken Williams
On Jul 5, 2005, at 4:44 AM, Johan Vromans wrote: ... I now strongly lean towards _not_ creating an additional entry point for this functionality. While GetOptionsFromArray seems nice, there's also a reason for GetOptionsToHash, GetOptionsWithNonStandardIntroducer and so on. This would make

Re[2]: Request for Comments - Tree::Node module?

2005-07-05 Thread Mattia Barbon
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 23:41:38 -0400 Randy W. Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Flavio S. Glock wrote: Randy W. Sims wrote: Note: you must compile Perl and all modules with the same compiler (or C runtime library). I compiled the DateTime module with MingW and CPAN Perl 5.8.7, and the