On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 09:50:17AM -0400, Buddy Burden wrote:
Brian,
Sourceforget sucks. Don't start using it just because I did. :)
I'd be really curious to hear your opinions on Sourceforge (there may be a
push to force us to start using it here at work). If you don't think you
could
On 7/28/05, Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I heard (or more probably read somewhere) that the name was 6PAN?
you are mixing it with 6PACK ;-)
Gabor
* Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-28 16:05]:
I thought I heard (or more probably read somewhere) that the
name was 6PAN?
That makes no sense. What is a “6 Perl Archive Network?” Okay,
visually, it roughly resembles “CPAN,” but I don’t see that as a
good reason to pick a
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 05:47:51PM +, Smylers wrote:
Andy Lester writes:
I don't think we need another CPAN at all. There's nothing wrong with
putting require 6; at the top of Makefile.PL and keeping everything in
one happy CPAN.
There is a problem if it interferes with people
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat wrote:
Le jeudi 28 juillet 2005 à 16:32, A. Pagaltzis écrivait:
* Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-28 16:05]:
I thought I heard (or more probably read somewhere) that the
name was 6PAN?
That makes no sense. What is a ???6 Perl
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 03:14:03PM -0500, Chris wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Andy Lester wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:32:11PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
* Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-28 16:05]:
I thought I heard (or more probably read
On 7/28/05, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Andy Lester wrote:
I don't think we need another CPAN at all. There's nothing wrong with
putting require 6; at the top of Makefile.PL and keeping everything in
one happy CPAN.
That means CPAN is going to have to parse it,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 05:48:58PM -0500, Peter wrote:
So, the way I would go about using this would be something like this?
my $obj=new SomeObj();
isa($obj, SomeObj) or BAIL_OUT(It wasn't my object :();
isa_ok() but you get the idea. You call it when you think the code is so
busted that
--- Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 28, 2005, at 6:26 PM, Randy W. Sims wrote:
That's true. All the smarts could be centralized in the indexer.
But then there's the problem of making sure when someone's browsing
CPAN manually (on a regular mirror or on search.cpan.org or
Ken Williams wrote:
On Jul 28, 2005, at 6:26 PM, Randy W. Sims wrote:
As far as distinguishing, there a lot of talk in the past in the
context of Apache2 about adding a field (generation) which serves
basically the same purpose - It distinguishes between multiple code
bases intended for
Ovid wrote:
--- Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 28, 2005, at 6:26 PM, Randy W. Sims wrote:
That's true. All the smarts could be centralized in the indexer.
But then there's the problem of making sure when someone's browsing
CPAN manually (on a regular mirror or on
11 matches
Mail list logo
