Re: Name space: throwing exceptions easily

2008-07-02 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-02 18:30]: * On Tue, Jul 01 2008, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: If I see a module called Exception::Easy in a list of modules, I have *absolutely no idea* what it does. In contrast, if it was Exception::Class::Functions, I could immediately guess

Re: Name space: throwing exceptions easily

2008-07-02 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Aristotle Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-03 00:25]: In fact, the “simplified” in “simplified interface” is largely redundant. Using an interface by definition means you are looking for simplification in doing or accessing the thing that the interface provides. Similar words that say

Re: Name space: throwing exceptions easily

2008-07-02 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Aristotle Pagaltzis # on Wednesday 02 July 2008 15:21: no one would call a module Exception::Complicated except as a joke. Well, you're going to have a hard time predicting what a gaggle of zany programmers might do, especially if you dare them like that ;-) I, for one, am seriously

Re: Name space: throwing exceptions easily

2008-07-02 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-03 02:00]: # from Aristotle Pagaltzis # on Wednesday 02 July 2008 15:21: no one would call a module Exception::Complicated except as a joke. Well, you're going to have a hard time predicting what a gaggle of zany programmers might do, especially

Re: Name space: throwing exceptions easily

2008-07-02 Thread David Nicol
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Aristotle Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-03 00:25]: No one would say that they are trying to achieve slowness or inflexibility. Drafted any mission-critical change control policies recently?