Matt,
You're not funny. Please try and be more polite in future.
I'm starting to suspect this has little to do with my response to Neil
and is instead a personal thing between us. I'll send you a message
off-list so we don't have to spam the rest of the world with the issue. :-)
> On May 10, 2016, at 4:09 PM, Matt S Trout wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:42:35AM -0700, Buddy Burden wrote:
>>> There is no perhaps involved. Neil knows what he's talking about.
>>>
>>> Please try to be less condescending to volunteers trying to help you by
>>>
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:42:35AM -0700, Buddy Burden wrote:
> >There is no perhaps involved. Neil knows what he's talking about.
> >
> >Please try to be less condescending to volunteers trying to help you by
> >telling you your exact mistake.
>
> Ummm ... maybe please try to be less
Matt,
So I was thinking, why would it complain about a non-existent
permissions error if it had no idea what the module name was
supposed to be in the first place?
It knows the dist name. To upload Date-Easy as a dist name requires perms
on Date::Easy.
Then the empty provides means it