Re: A question of permissions

2016-05-10 Thread Buddy Burden
Matt, You're not funny. Please try and be more polite in future. I'm starting to suspect this has little to do with my response to Neil and is instead a personal thing between us. I'll send you a message off-list so we don't have to spam the rest of the world with the issue. :-)

Re: A question of permissions

2016-05-10 Thread Olaf Alders
> On May 10, 2016, at 4:09 PM, Matt S Trout wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:42:35AM -0700, Buddy Burden wrote: >>> There is no perhaps involved. Neil knows what he's talking about. >>> >>> Please try to be less condescending to volunteers trying to help you by >>>

Re: A question of permissions

2016-05-10 Thread Matt S Trout
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:42:35AM -0700, Buddy Burden wrote: > >There is no perhaps involved. Neil knows what he's talking about. > > > >Please try to be less condescending to volunteers trying to help you by > >telling you your exact mistake. > > Ummm ... maybe please try to be less

Re: A question of permissions

2016-05-10 Thread Buddy Burden
Matt, So I was thinking, why would it complain about a non-existent permissions error if it had no idea what the module name was supposed to be in the first place? It knows the dist name. To upload Date-Easy as a dist name requires perms on Date::Easy. Then the empty provides means it