Re: A question of permissions

2016-05-12 Thread Matt S Trout
Right, we're in touch off list this time, so we can now take this extended episode of 'communication is hard' somewhere else. Sorry for the noise, everybody. -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/

Re: A question of permissions

2016-05-12 Thread Buddy Burden
Matt, I am perfectly willing to continue this conversation off list if you wish to, ... Yes, let's. -- Buddy

Re: A question of permissions

2016-05-12 Thread Matt S Trout
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:19:13AM +0200, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > * Matt S Trout [2016-05-11 20:23]: > > Were I you, I'd simply take the evidence as available: > > > > - At least four people thought your comment was phrased unkindly > > - At least one person thought

Re: A question of permissions

2016-05-12 Thread Matt S Trout
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:08:06PM -0700, Buddy Burden wrote: > Okey dokey. My last word is: I'm saddened that you chose to ignore > the personal message I sent you off-list. There's been no off-list message from you to this address. Please try and consider the possibility that I was genuinely

Re: A question of permissions

2016-05-12 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Matt S Trout [2016-05-11 20:23]: > Were I you, I'd simply take the evidence as available: > > - At least four people thought your comment was phrased unkindly > - At least one person thought your comment was phrased fine I cringed at the comment, but I also realised