I think Car::Tesla:: ... is TRT here.
Vehicle is nice and general, but I wouldn't expect to share a namespace with
stuff for working with my pushbike speedo. Car:: is pretty clear and
universal. Internet-of-Things is an amusing byline for journos, but doesn't
actually mean anything (or at
'Smart' is subjective, and not very informative. How about
File::Temp::ByFnName ?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Rothenberg [mailto:r...@fastmail.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:24 PM
To: Perl Module Authors List
Subject: Need suggestions for a module name
While debugging a
Isn't that just a way of saying that we reach for the stars by standing
on the shoulders of giants?
-Original Message-
From: Johan Vromans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 9:44 AM
To: module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: lambda - a shortcut for sub {...}
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rockway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pearce, Martyn wrote:
It is? How so?
Don't top-post. It ruins the flow for people trying to reply to you.
Fair point, apologies. I blame outlook, which I use only under protest.
To answer your question, see
Functionally, stat(_) avoids actually doing a second stat.
Of course, your gripe may be aesthetic, which this won't help.
-Original Message-
From: Ovid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 11:52 AM
To: module-authors@perl.org
Subject: Re: Module name - smoke testing
Indeed, the example seems to contradict the text:
The behaviour shown is entirely predictable. I'd also argue that it's
desirable, although I guess that it's subjective.
-Original Message-
From: imacat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 11:01 AM
To: Perl Module
I am not convinced of this. As I read it, the developer using CGI::Tooltip
needs no Javascript knowledge; I think I would see CGI::Javascript::Tooltip
and immediately exclude it as I have no knowledge of Javascript. It should
be made clear in the docs of the module that javascript is required at
Yeah, that makes sense to me.
-Original Message-
From: khemir nadim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New module: CGI::Tooltip
OK that was the first part of my proposal (and I find your
explication for its dismissa
You may or may not care to peruse the underdocumented Getopt::Plus,
which has similar aims to scriptalicious, but quite a different approach.
Mx.
-Original Message-
From: Sam Vilain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 7:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New
Er, I think you're quoting Sam rather than me there.
Mx.
-Original Message-
From: Johan Vromans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 10:36 AM
To: Pearce, Martyn
Cc: 'Sam Vilain'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: New module: Scriptalicious
[Quoting Pearce, Martyn
Are you sure that you want to do this?
As you're working at runtime, will you gain anything in defining a constant
rather than simply a global, or better, package-scope variable?
Mx.
-Original Message-
From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004
11 matches
Mail list logo
