I' ve actually submitted under the name 'Getopt::Plus' now.
Will the next release be called 'Getopt::Plus::Plus' ? :)
-J
Sorry about the empty message.
What about Getopt::Easy or Getopt::Simple?
-J
--
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Martyn J. Pearce wrote:
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 04:22:11PM +1100, Ken Williams wrote:
I suggest something like GetOpt::Unified or GetOpt::Common or
something. But don't take a really good
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 04:22:11PM +1100, Ken Williams wrote:
I suggest something like GetOpt::Unified or GetOpt::Common or
something. But don't take a really good namespace unless you
plan on maintaining it. ;-)
Fair point :-)
I warm to Getopt::StdResource, and Getopt::Plus. Any votes
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Hugh S. Myers wrote:
Clever of you to miss the point entirely. That being to put it in the
GetOpt namespace---the rest is up to the author...
Clever of you to miss that I did get your point entirely. :) I agreed
with you which is why I made my example in the GetOpt
