On Dec 15, 2004, at 3:56 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
It seems to me that your code could be used to implement either
a DFA or an NFA, so you might want to call it it an FSM.
Algorithm::FSM, perhaps? Or maybe Decision::FSM??
I went with FSM::Rules. I think it's a good name, and falls in line, I
On Dec 15, 2004, at 2:17 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
Ovid and I were getting fed up with the horrible DFA::Simple
module, so I wrote a new module, DFA::StateMachine, to take
its place in our work.
Cool.
But I'm no computer scientist, so I'm not even sure whether
the name is right or if the module
Hi All,
Ovid and I were getting fed up with the horrible DFA::Simple module, so
I wrote a new module, DFA::StateMachine, to take its place in our work.
But I'm no computer scientist, so I'm not even sure whether the name is
right or if the module functions the way a DFA state machine is
