On Wednesday 02 May 2007 09:26:56 am Ovid wrote:
--- Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, Zawodny was a joke. But JWZ is still Zawinski, not Zawinsky.
Gah. Kill me now, please.
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think Gah. Kill me now,
please. Now they have two problems.
* Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-03 11:00]:
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 09:26:56 am Ovid wrote:
--- Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, Zawodny was a joke. But JWZ is still Zawinski, not
Zawinsky.
Gah. Kill me now, please.
Some people, when confronted with a
--- Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but for the most part it is a happy little bubble. When I lose that
abstraction layer, I guess I'll have to go sell fishing reels, start
a night club, join a monastery, or etc.
Hmm, let's see. 'grep' from Portland.pm gave up IT to sell fishing
On 2 May 2007, at 11:35, Ovid wrote:
Hmm, let's see. 'grep' from Portland.pm gave up IT to sell fishing
reels. Jamie Zawicky started a night club and Randal Schwartz has DJd
at them. Many of us are members of the Perlmonks Monastery. I guess
we've all lost that abstraction layer ... :)
* Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 12:40]:
Jamie Zawicky
Zawinsky.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 12:40]:
Jamie Zawicky
Zawinsky.
Zawinski, actually -- or is it Zawodny?
--
Keith C. Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Washington, DC
--- Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 12:40]:
Jamie Zawicky
Zawinsky.
Zawinski, actually -- or is it Zawodny?
Nope. Aristotle's right. I definitely meant Zawinsky. He runs the
DNA Lounge (http://www.dnalounge.com/).
Ovid wrote:
Nope. Aristotle's right. I definitely meant Zawinsky. He runs the
DNA Lounge (http://www.dnalounge.com/). Their music seems awesome. If
I ever get to that part of the world, I might just drop in.
(Zawodny works for Yahoo!)
Yeah, Zawodny was a joke. But JWZ is still Zawinski,
--- Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, Zawodny was a joke. But JWZ is still Zawinski, not Zawinsky.
Gah. Kill me now, please.
--
Buy the book -- http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Perl and CGI -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
Andy == Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andy On 2 May 2007, at 11:35, Ovid wrote:
Hmm, let's see. 'grep' from Portland.pm gave up IT to sell fishing
reels. Jamie Zawicky started a night club and Randal Schwartz has DJd
at them. Many of us are members of the Perlmonks Monastery. I
On 2 May 2007, at 23:40, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Andy That's me in the corner.
Andy That's me in the spotlight.
Andy Losing my abstraction layer.
s/layer//, it scans better.
Trying to keep my point of view...
And I don't know if I can do it.
Oh no, I code too much.
Haven't debugged enough.
* Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 16:10]:
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
* Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 12:40]:
Jamie Zawicky
Zawinsky.
Zawinski, actually
Gah.
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
On 28/04/07, Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# from Fergal Daly
# on Saturday 28 April 2007 06:28 am:
You don't have it as a prereq in Makefile.PL. It's possible the
machines running the test don't have it installed (people do weird
things to their perl instlls some times),
Like delete
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:56:40 -0700
Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the problem is the $ENV{PERL} || 'perl' bit. You want $^X.
Aahhh yes, that looks quite likely. That was a line for our custom perl
testing harness at work. I should change that to use $^X, indeed.
--
Paul
# from Fergal Daly
# on Saturday 28 April 2007 02:16 pm:
Like delete core modules? I don't think it's a prereq issue.
It must be nice to live in a world where all bug reports come from
people with sane configurations :)
Yeah, that's part of the grand delusion which allows me to keep working
You don't have it as a prereq in Makefile.PL. It's possible the
machines running the test don't have it installed (people do weird
things to their perl instlls some times),
F
On 28/04/07, Paul LeoNerd Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a large number of failures (9 fail vs. 6 pass) on one
# from Fergal Daly
# on Saturday 28 April 2007 06:28 am:
You don't have it as a prereq in Makefile.PL. It's possible the
machines running the test don't have it installed (people do weird
things to their perl instlls some times),
Like delete core modules? I don't think it's a prereq issue.
#
17 matches
Mail list logo