Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-05-03 Thread Jonathan Rockway
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 09:26:56 am Ovid wrote: --- Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, Zawodny was a joke. But JWZ is still Zawinski, not Zawinsky. Gah. Kill me now, please. Some people, when confronted with a problem, think Gah. Kill me now, please. Now they have two problems.

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-05-03 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-03 11:00]: On Wednesday 02 May 2007 09:26:56 am Ovid wrote: --- Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, Zawodny was a joke. But JWZ is still Zawinski, not Zawinsky. Gah. Kill me now, please. Some people, when confronted with a

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-05-02 Thread Ovid
--- Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but for the most part it is a happy little bubble. When I lose that abstraction layer, I guess I'll have to go sell fishing reels, start a night club, join a monastery, or etc. Hmm, let's see. 'grep' from Portland.pm gave up IT to sell fishing

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-05-02 Thread Andy Armstrong
On 2 May 2007, at 11:35, Ovid wrote: Hmm, let's see. 'grep' from Portland.pm gave up IT to sell fishing reels. Jamie Zawicky started a night club and Randal Schwartz has DJd at them. Many of us are members of the Perlmonks Monastery. I guess we've all lost that abstraction layer ... :)

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-05-02 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 12:40]: Jamie Zawicky Zawinsky. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-05-02 Thread Keith Ivey
A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 12:40]: Jamie Zawicky Zawinsky. Zawinski, actually -- or is it Zawodny? -- Keith C. Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Washington, DC

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-05-02 Thread Ovid
--- Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 12:40]: Jamie Zawicky Zawinsky. Zawinski, actually -- or is it Zawodny? Nope. Aristotle's right. I definitely meant Zawinsky. He runs the DNA Lounge (http://www.dnalounge.com/).

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-05-02 Thread Keith Ivey
Ovid wrote: Nope. Aristotle's right. I definitely meant Zawinsky. He runs the DNA Lounge (http://www.dnalounge.com/). Their music seems awesome. If I ever get to that part of the world, I might just drop in. (Zawodny works for Yahoo!) Yeah, Zawodny was a joke. But JWZ is still Zawinski,

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-05-02 Thread Ovid
--- Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, Zawodny was a joke. But JWZ is still Zawinski, not Zawinsky. Gah. Kill me now, please. -- Buy the book -- http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Perl and CGI -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-05-02 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
Andy == Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andy On 2 May 2007, at 11:35, Ovid wrote: Hmm, let's see. 'grep' from Portland.pm gave up IT to sell fishing reels. Jamie Zawicky started a night club and Randal Schwartz has DJd at them. Many of us are members of the Perlmonks Monastery. I

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-05-02 Thread Andy Armstrong
On 2 May 2007, at 23:40, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Andy That's me in the corner. Andy That's me in the spotlight. Andy Losing my abstraction layer. s/layer//, it scans better. Trying to keep my point of view... And I don't know if I can do it. Oh no, I code too much. Haven't debugged enough.

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-05-02 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Keith Ivey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 16:10]: A. Pagaltzis wrote: * Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 12:40]: Jamie Zawicky Zawinsky. Zawinski, actually Gah. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-04-29 Thread Fergal Daly
On 28/04/07, Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # from Fergal Daly # on Saturday 28 April 2007 06:28 am: You don't have it as a prereq in Makefile.PL. It's possible the machines running the test don't have it installed (people do weird things to their perl instlls some times), Like delete

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-04-29 Thread Paul LeoNerd Evans
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:56:40 -0700 Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the problem is the $ENV{PERL} || 'perl' bit. You want $^X. Aahhh yes, that looks quite likely. That was a line for our custom perl testing harness at work. I should change that to use $^X, indeed. -- Paul

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-04-29 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Fergal Daly # on Saturday 28 April 2007 02:16 pm: Like delete core modules?  I don't think it's a prereq issue. It must be nice to live in a world where all bug reports come from people with sane configurations :) Yeah, that's part of the grand delusion which allows me to keep working

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-04-28 Thread Fergal Daly
You don't have it as a prereq in Makefile.PL. It's possible the machines running the test don't have it installed (people do weird things to their perl instlls some times), F On 28/04/07, Paul LeoNerd Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a large number of failures (9 fail vs. 6 pass) on one

Re: Test failures - I can't work out why

2007-04-28 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Fergal Daly # on Saturday 28 April 2007 06:28 am: You don't have it as a prereq in Makefile.PL. It's possible the machines running the test don't have it installed (people do weird things to their perl instlls some times), Like delete core modules? I don't think it's a prereq issue. #