# from A. Pagaltzis
# on Friday 20 April 2007 10:34 am:
As far as I’m concerned, `configure_requires` is the solution
that should have been implemented IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Yep. That about says it all. That, and a client that checks for the
need to update whenever if fetches the module list.
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 05:12 pm:
If you really want Module::Build to be installed, why not simply
create a traditional Makefile.PL and add Module::Build as a
prerequisite? That way your module can be installed with
* Adam Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-20 18:30]:
Module::Build's main attitude has always been to make things
easier for authors at the expense of users, in part by
implementing things that the rest of the tool-chain simply
doesn't support.
And Module::Install makes things easy for users
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:32:48 -0700, Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
# from Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 05:12 pm:
If you really want Module::Build to be installed, why not simply
create a traditional Makefile.PL and add Module::Build as a
If META.yml says you need Module::Build and I don't provide a
Makefile.PL, wouldn't that be a good time to install Module::Build?
Should I just put a die in Makefile.PL to avoid this silly we're
obviously missing the required build system but we'll try to pretend
anyway stuff?
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:49:07 -0700
Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If META.yml says you need Module::Build and I don't provide a
Makefile.PL, wouldn't that be a good time to install Module::Build?
Should I just put a die in Makefile.PL to avoid this silly we're
obviously missing the
On 4/16/07, Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If META.yml says you need Module::Build and I don't provide a
Makefile.PL, wouldn't that be a good time to install Module::Build?
Should I just put a die in Makefile.PL to avoid this silly we're
obviously missing the required build system but
# from Paul LeoNerd Evans
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 02:14 am:
I ran into similar issues; I've discussed them earlier on this list.
Yep.
# from David Golden on Sunday 11 March 2007 05:43 am:
This bug is the result of CPANPLUS trying to be clever and falling
back to generating a
On 4/17/07, Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# from Paul LeoNerd Evans
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 02:14 am:
I ran into similar issues; I've discussed them earlier on this list.
Yep.
# from David Golden on Sunday 11 March 2007 05:43 am:
This bug is the result of CPANPLUS trying to be
* Joshua ben Jore [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-17 16:25]:
I've wondered about this - can you get a Makefile.PL to prereq
Module::Build so CPAN.pm installs it, then transfer control
over to M::B?
If someone came up with a way to make this work reliably, the
entire raison d’être for
# from A. Pagaltzis
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 01:21 pm:
I've wondered about this - can you get a Makefile.PL to prereq
Module::Build so CPAN.pm installs it, then transfer control
over to M::B?
If someone came up with a way to make this work reliably, the
entire raison d’être for
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
The suggestion people made was to have M::B produce a
'traditional'-style makefile as well. So at least M::B-deprived
systems might have a good go.
My problem with the create_makefile_pl = 'traditional' is that it
doesn't install Module::Build, so we're not making any
# from Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 05:12 pm:
If you really want Module::Build to be installed, why not simply
create a traditional Makefile.PL and add Module::Build as a
prerequisite? That way your module can be installed with
ExtUtils::MakeMaker yet Module::Build
On Apr 17, 2007, at 12:16 PM, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
The suggestion people made was to have M::B produce a
'traditional'-style makefile as well. So at least M::B-deprived
systems might have a good go.
My problem with the create_makefile_pl = 'traditional' is that it
doesn't install
# from Andreas J. Koenig
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 09:18 pm:
The solution really should not involve 'traditional'.
Furthermore, I already do declare a dependency on Module::Build in
the META.yml. It seems that this is ignored though. I understand
Adam's argument about
On 4/17/07, Eric Wilhelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# from Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni
# on Tuesday 17 April 2007 05:12 pm:
If you really want Module::Build to be installed, why not simply
create a traditional Makefile.PL and add Module::Build as a
prerequisite? That way your module can be
16 matches
Mail list logo
