Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail addresses

2006-08-23 Thread imacat
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:47:14 -0400 David Golden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andy Armstrong wrote: Generally, I think these kinds of things get handled by the Perl NOC team. (http://noc.perl.org) Email Ask Hansen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, I've been looking for the same information for a

Re: Give up your modules!

2006-08-23 Thread imacat
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 03:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No names, but if you happen to be sitting on a module which other people depend on and you're not going to fix bugs, give up the module, offer someone co-maintainership or figure out *something* which gives users a way

Re: Give up your modules!

2006-08-23 Thread Ovid
- Original Message From: imacat [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:19:15 -0500 Andy Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Re-making my mental note to transcribe Stop saying 'script') Sorry I might be off-topic, but why Stop saying 'script'? I have searched the google and

Re: Give up your modules!

2006-08-23 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:52:26PM +0800, imacat wrote: But this ain't right. Crypt-Cracklib is critical to security and user management, Crypt-Rijndael is the current US governmental standard encryption algorithm, and x86_64 is the contemporary architech. It's just not right that they

Re: Give up your modules!

2006-08-23 Thread Ken Williams
On Aug 23, 2006, at 5:52 AM, imacat wrote: Ovid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No names, but if you happen to be sitting on a module which other people depend on and you're not going to fix bugs, give up the module, offer someone co-maintainership or figure out *something* which gives users a