One quick comment - why not follow DBI's lead and use ::PurePerl:: instead
of ::Perl::?
--Bill.
--
William R Ward[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-
A foolish consistency is the
UI::Dialog
UI::Dialog::GNOME
UI::Dialog::KDE
UI::Dialog::Console
UI::Dialog::Backend::Zenity
UI::Dialog::Backend::GDialog
UI::Dialog::Backend::XDialog
UI::Dialog::Backend::KDialog
UI::Dialog::Backend::CDialog
UI::Dialog::Backend::Whiptail
UI::Dialog::Backend::ASCII
(future native perl extensions)
On 3 Jun 2003, Kevin C. Krinke wrote:
...and the beat goes on...
Would somebody give Kevin a cookie for his concerted effort to get this
audiences' difficult approval? His persistance is admirable IMHO.
--
/chris
Programming is a Dark Art, and it will always be. The programmer is
fighting
Kevin C. Krinke writes:
UI::Dialog::Backend::GDialog
^^^^
Sorry to bring this up again, but I still don't see how the second
Dialog helps clarify anything in the slightest.
Having gone past UI::Dialog::Backend, we know that it is a
user-interface thing, related to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jay Lawrence) writes:
Per my earlier suggestion of Business::Forms there was some positive
direction towards a more top level naming of Paper:: - I am
soliciting guidance to the most appropriate place to put this module -
top level, nested level, etc.
Can I please beg
On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 15:05, Smylers wrote:
Kevin C. Krinke writes:
UI::Dialog::Backend::GDialog
^^^^
Sorry to bring this up again,
Sure you are... :)
but I still don't see how the second
Dialog helps clarify anything in the slightest.
Having gone past
All seems fine to me.
Tim.
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 09:17:13PM -0400, Kevin C. Krinke wrote:
UI::Dialog
UI::Dialog::GNOME
UI::Dialog::KDE
UI::Dialog::Console
UI::Dialog::Backend::Zenity
UI::Dialog::Backend::GDialog
UI::Dialog::Backend::XDialog
UI::Dialog::Backend::KDialog
