Title: RE: Tie::Array::Sorted
* Simon Cozens simon at simon-cozens.org [2003-11-12 13:32]:
Is Tie::Array::Sorted a reasonable name for it, or would another one
be more obvious?
DB_File has a way to do this iirc.
But it is a shocking ommission if there isnt at least one other way. I
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Sam Vilain wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:29, Michael G Schwern wrote;
YAML was chosen because its human readable and writable, its data
^ ^
So long as you're a FREAK who likes INDENTING and WHITESPACE to
Simon Cozens wrote:
Hi. I'm about to write a module which presents an array in sorted order;
$a[0] will always be the least element by some comparator. Miraculously,
there doesn't seem to be such a beast on CPAN already.
Is Tie::Array::Sorted a reasonable name for it, or would another one be more
* Bruno Negrao [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-11-10 20:11]:
Im finishing to write a module, Proc::Daemontools, and it
requires that the daemontools package be installed on a machine
for it to work. Where must I indicate that this module have a
dependency?
I can't believe noone understood what you
RE: Tie::Array::SortedHi Simon and others,
I agree that Tie::Array::Sorted is a good name.
But it is a shocking ommission if there isnt at least one other way. I
definately vote for
Tie::Array::Sorted, but It may be worth having a look at Tie::Hash::Sorted
and make
them compatible on some
* Bruno Negrao [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-11-12 18:47]:
Also, you could try to guess (via regexps) if the data to be
sorted is numeric or alphabetical and use the appropriate
subrouting to order it.
Bleah. This kind of second-guessing easily leads to surprises.
Being explicit is good.
--
Hi Aristotle, (in portuguese your name is written Aristteles:)
I can't believe noone understood what you were talking about and
went off to lala-land. :-/
:-) hehehehe lala-land, that was fun!
Yes, they simply ignored what I asked them.
Even if I use the technique you suggested, when an
Bruno Negrao wrote:
Hi Aristotle, (in portuguese your name is written Aristteles:)
I can't believe noone understood what you were talking about and
went off to lala-land. :-/
:-) hehehehe lala-land, that was fun!
Yes, they simply ignored what I asked them.
Even if I use the technique you
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:22:01PM +, Oliver White wrote:
As a first step, I was considering adding a module to read GSHHS data [a
binary format for coastline data] and give it a name something like
Geo::GSHHS. More info at the site:
http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/wessel/gshhs/gshhs.html
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:42:05PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:16:51PM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:32:13PM +, Simon Cozens wrote:
Hi. I'm about to write a module which presents an array in sorted order;
$a[0] will always be the
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:22:01 +, Oliver White wrote:
Hiya. I'm about to start work on some GIS programming in Perl, and
will likely end up with a few modules that might usefully go onto
CPAN.
From what I've read on the FAQs though, it seems like a bit of a
minefield to
choose a name
OK, maybe I'm missing a LOT of context here, 'cause I haven't been
agressively keeping up with this mailing list, but the security hole
argument seems a bit odd.
These META.yml files we're refering to -- these are meta data for
managing the build process, files that will be distributed along
Chris == Christopher Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, if I understand this correctly, you're worried about the build
process eval'ing the contents of a file I sent you. Hmm.
OK, why is that anymore of a concern for eval'ing the perl module I
also distributed, too? Isn't that just as
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 04:11:45PM +, Sam Vilain wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 02:29, Michael G Schwern wrote;
YAML was chosen because its human readable and writable, its data
^ ^
So long as you're a FREAK who likes INDENTING and
14 matches
Mail list logo
