On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 10:15:20PM -0500, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote:
On dbi-users... I responded to Tim Bunce's most helpful suggestions as
follows... He suggested Sys::SigAction as name. Since the module is all
about wrapping up system (POSIX) sigaction() calls, I like it!
Lincoln,
A slow
* Lincoln A. Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-12 10:02]:
On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 15:50, Tim Bunce wrote:
It might also be worth adding some mechanism to integrate with Sys::Signal
http://search.cpan.org/src/DOUGM/Sys-Signal/Signal.pm
I took a look that this. It is little bit of perlxs glue
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 10:15:20PM -0500, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote:
On dbi-users... I responded to Tim Bunce's most helpful suggestions as
follows... He suggested Sys::SigAction as name. Since the module is all
about wrapping up system (POSIX) sigaction() calls, I like it!
On Sun, 2004-01-11
At 10:09 + 1/12/04, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 10:15:20PM -0500, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote:
eval {
local $SIG{ALRM} = sub { ... };
}
Either way your Sys::SigAction is sufficient. The only thing it's
lacking that Sys::Signal has is the automatic restoration of the
Hi All, this seems to be the group I have been looking for (and missed for
few years).
The module I am working on lately is a Spreadsheet (Spreadsheet::Perl),
There is also a Data::TreeDumper that can be of interrest wich is very good
at filtering data, it looks good and is easier to follow
khemir nadim wrote:
Why not call you module Roman::Extended (or whatever name you fancy)
and upload it to CPAN? You can then forget about Roman.pm altogether
and go on with your module.
In this case, a better option would be to change your focus and
contribute to one of:
Text::Roman -
Hello,
I'm interested in feedback on a module
* Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-12 23:22]:
OK Name?
Sounds good to me.
Useful idea?
Most certainly. (This question being the sole reason for me to
pipe up, really.) It would've been cool to have this back when I
was trying to write a script for such duties.
Clear documentation?
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 05:46, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
At 10:09 + 1/12/04, Tim Bunce wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 10:15:20PM -0500, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote:
eval {
local $SIG{ALRM} = sub { ... };
}
Either way your Sys::SigAction is sufficient. The only thing it's
Is this an appropriate post to module-authors or would it
be better taken to fun-with-perl? It's a module announcement...
Acme::please is for randomly inserting please into
your output via a tied scalar. The string and printing percentage
are both configurable (see the documentation.)
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 04:18, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
IMO it would be much neater not to have to separately localize
$SIG{ALRM} but to have restoration optionally done by your module
on request. I believe the clearest way to handle the syntax would
be a check for context in sig_set_handler() and
Nadim,
This module looks neat. The way speadsheets automatically update data
on dependencies, like a continually running makefile, seem to be their
main benefit, but they do have some limitations since the data in a
problem must be flattened onto a two-dimensional grid. Being a
programmer,
12 matches
Mail list logo
