On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 17:23:46 +, Martyn J. Pearce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:25:53AM +, Tim Bunce wrote:
Yes. It's finely balanced though. I can see merit on both sides.
The fill in a form situation is relatively common. But beyond the
MySQL/Pg model of
Henrik Tougaard wrote on 07 December 2004 10:59
Martyn J. Pearce skrev:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:25:53AM +, Tim Bunce wrote:
...
The simplest fix is to standardize one set of driver DSN attribute
names so that at least the host, port, and database (schema) can
be specified in a
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Henrik Tougaard wrote:
Maybe the number of responses on this thread come from people who
have this itch to scratch.
Huh? I've only been seeing what got cross-posted on this to
module-authors until today, but I just subscribed to dbi-usres
n
I have heard Tim Bunce (DBI,
Christopher Hicks wrote:
Coming up with common set of parameters that most DB's are going to
require and then providing standardized names for them would seem to be
useful in general. So far I havent seen anyone provide something that a
given driver Has To Have that doesn't fit into the
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Orton, Yves wrote:
I was given the Henrik or some other hypothetical respondant the benefit
of the doubt.
I figured that out by the end of reading your email.
:-)
:-]
I thought it was clear I think that this is both doable and worth doing.
Yes yes. I didn't think there was
Orton, Yves wrote:
DBD::Ingres does something similar. DBD::Oracle appears to be closer to
Sybase/MySQl:
dbi:Oracle:host=myhost.com;sid=ORCL
Normally you don't bother with connection parameters with Oracle at all:
DBI-connect(dbi:Oracle:, database, password);
Instead, you configure which logical
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 10:21:35 +1300, Sam Vilain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that this information should be removed from most programs
altogether. They should just have to specify a logical data source
(possibly including a schema version), then a module with a config file
maps that to a
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 11:51:41AM -0600, Chris Josephes wrote:
Either way, does this traffic need to be replicated on both dbi-users and
module-authors?? I would think the DBI list would supercede the other.
I agree.
Can anyone replying to this thread please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED]
from
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:38:12PM +, Tim Bunce wrote:
---
The simplest fix is to standardize one set of driver DSN attribute
names so that at least the host, port, and database (schema) can
be specified in a portable way.
Most drivers already support the foo=bar;... style in the DSN
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Christopher Hicks wrote:
I don't care about Oracle or any of the rest. Making this work with PG
and MySQL will solve 90% of the world's problems. I don't see why it
couldn't be extended to include whatever parameters where necessary for
any of the proprietary databases,
10 matches
Mail list logo
