Re: ISO8601 Module: Would this be worth writing?

2006-05-27 Thread Benjamin Smith
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:07:22PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: Hi Ron, * Ron Blaschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-26 22:00]: I'm thinking about writing an ISO 8601 module, and would like to know if you guys would consider it useful. see HTTP::Date. There's not just that; if you enter

Re: ISO8601 Module: Would this be worth writing?

2006-05-27 Thread Ron Blaschke
A. Pagaltzis wrote: Hi Ron, * Ron Blaschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-26 22:00]: I'm thinking about writing an ISO 8601 module, and would like to know if you guys would consider it useful. see HTTP::Date. The fact that it’s burried inside libwww-perl has annoyed me more than once,

Re: ISO8601 Module: Would this be worth writing?

2006-05-27 Thread Ron Blaschke
Benjamin Smith wrote: On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:07:22PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: Hi Ron, * Ron Blaschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-26 22:00]: I'm thinking about writing an ISO 8601 module, and would like to know if you guys would consider it useful. see HTTP::Date. There's not just

Re: ISO8601 Module: Would this be worth writing?

2006-05-27 Thread Smylers
Ron Blaschke writes: DateTime::Format::ISO8601 feels rather heavyweight, with dependencies on DateTime DateTime _is_ quite heavyweight, but it's also generally right, and there's a whole suite of modules which work with it, meaning that you can live almost entirely in the DateTime world for

Re: Module naming advice

2006-05-27 Thread Tim Bunce
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:26:22PM +0200, David Landgren wrote: Jeff Lavallee wrote: Hi all, before I upload a new module, I thought I'd make sure the namespace I intend to use makes sense. I've been working on a set of modules to make interacting with the next generation of Yahoo's

Re: Module naming advice

2006-05-27 Thread David Golden
Tim Bunce wrote: On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:26:22PM +0200, David Landgren wrote: Jeff Lavallee wrote: of the SOAP::Lite details. Currently, I'm planning on calling it Yahoo::Marketing. Yahoo::Marketing.pm itself would just serve as a place holder (with POD) for the time being, with all the