Re: CPAN testers machines that lack Module::Build

2007-03-14 Thread Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni
Ken Williams wrote: On Mar 13, 2007, at 8:38 PM, Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni wrote: Jonathan Rockway wrote: Why don't y'all just use Module::Install? It handles build_requires, AND you can bundle modules with your dist, in case dependencies worry you. Problems solved. OTOH,

Re: CPAN testers machines that lack Module::Build

2007-03-14 Thread Smylers
Jonathan Rockway writes: Why don't y'all just use Module::Install? As has been mentioned before on this list, because it involves bundling an installer with your module. So if the installer changes (to fix a bug that affects the ability of (some) end users to install your module), you have to

Re: CPAN testers machines that lack Module::Build

2007-03-14 Thread Johan Vromans
Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why don't y'all just use Module::Install? Because it doesn't perform a mere install, as the name suggests. It builds, meaning it requires (and uses) a build environment -- and scares away customers that do not want to have a build environment on

Re: CPAN testers machines that lack Module::Build

2007-03-14 Thread Adam Kennedy
Johan Vromans wrote: Jonathan Rockway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why don't y'all just use Module::Install? Because it doesn't perform a mere install, as the name suggests. It builds, meaning it requires (and uses) a build environment -- and scares away customers that do not want to have a