Re: Tk / Nick Ing-Simmons

2007-11-22 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 04:54:31PM +, Andy Armstrong wrote: I notice that since Nick Img-Simmons' sad passing Tk seems unmaintained. It certainly doesn't build on 5.10. I wonder if anyone knows the status of it and whether anyone is considering maintaining it? Thoughts? I think

Re: Tk / Nick Ing-Simmons

2007-11-22 Thread Andy Armstrong
On 22 Nov 2007, at 18:24, Nicholas Clark wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 04:54:31PM +, Andy Armstrong wrote: I notice that since Nick Img-Simmons' sad passing Tk seems unmaintained. It certainly doesn't build on 5.10. I wonder if anyone knows the status of it and whether anyone is

Re: Tk / Nick Ing-Simmons

2007-11-22 Thread Andy Armstrong
On 22 Nov 2007, at 18:19, Andy Lester wrote: I notice that since Nick Img-Simmons' sad passing Tk seems unmaintained. It certainly doesn't build on 5.10. I wonder if anyone knows the status of it and whether anyone is considering maintaining it? I think that it's important to Nick's

Tk / Nick Ing-Simmons

2007-11-22 Thread Andy Armstrong
I notice that since Nick Img-Simmons' sad passing Tk seems unmaintained. It certainly doesn't build on 5.10. I wonder if anyone knows the status of it and whether anyone is considering maintaining it? I think that it's important to Nick's memory that his code is not allowed to rot. Unless

Re: Tk / Nick Ing-Simmons

2007-11-22 Thread Andy Lester
On Nov 22, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Andy Armstrong wrote: I notice that since Nick Img-Simmons' sad passing Tk seems unmaintained. It certainly doesn't build on 5.10. I wonder if anyone knows the status of it and whether anyone is considering maintaining it? I think that it's important to

Re: Tk / Nick Ing-Simmons

2007-11-22 Thread Andy Lester
On Nov 22, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote: I think you're missing what Slaven has been up to: http://search.cpan.org/~srezic/Tk-804.027_501/ Duh, and I even gave him rights to it. :-( -- Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance

autoconf-like work in Build.PL - detecting OS features

2007-11-22 Thread Paul LeoNerd Evans
I'm writing a Perl wrapper around Linux's ppoll() system call. The requirements here are OS = Linux Kernel version = 2.6.16 GNU libc = 2.4 The first two are quite easy to detect in Build.PL, the third is very difficult. Having failed to think up a nice way to do that, my next approach is

Re: autoconf-like work in Build.PL - detecting OS features

2007-11-22 Thread David Cantrell
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 08:25:36PM +, Paul LeoNerd Evans wrote: I'm writing a Perl wrapper around Linux's ppoll() system call. The requirements here are OS = Linux Kernel version = 2.6.16 GNU libc = 2.4 The first two are quite easy to detect in Build.PL, the third is very