Optional Features and down-stream modules

2009-08-17 Thread Zbigniew Lukasiak
Optional features are not well suited for automated install. They impose questions on the install - but what is more important they generate problems when for down-stream modules that rely on the optional features. There is no easy way to specify this - and also if those optional features depend

splitting up a monolithic distribution - bioperl

2009-08-17 Thread Chris Fields
All, Immediately after the next bioperl release in the next few weeks, we plan on splitting up bioperl 'core' (~900 or so modules?!?) into separate focused distributions. This has been long overdue but delayed for many reasons, primarily b/c no one wants to take it on. Is there a

should we still be registering module namespaces?

2009-08-17 Thread Jonathan Swartz
Is there still a point to registering module namespaces on PAUSE? The form (https://pause.perl.org/pause/authenquery?ACTION=apply_mod) is still active, but it says that registering is for maintaining the Modules List which has not been maintained for several years. I've seen the small

Re: should we still be registering module namespaces?

2009-08-17 Thread Ricardo Signes
* Jonathan Swartz swa...@pobox.com [2009-08-17T10:48:24] Is there still a point to registering module namespaces on PAUSE? In my opinion, no. The only benefit to the list is that first-time authors think it's important, so they talk to the admins of it, who can offer valuable advice for

Re: should we still be registering module namespaces?

2009-08-17 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 07:48:24AM -0700, Jonathan Swartz wrote: Is there still a point to registering module namespaces on PAUSE? No. -- David Cantrell | even more awesome than a panda-fur coat If I could read only one thing it would be the future, in the entrails of the bastard

Re: should we still be registering module namespaces?

2009-08-17 Thread Jonathan Swartz
On Aug 17, 2009, at 8:02 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote: * Jonathan Swartz swa...@pobox.com [2009-08-17T10:48:24] Is there still a point to registering module namespaces on PAUSE? In my opinion, no. The only benefit to the list is that first-time authors think it's important, so they talk to

Re: splitting up a monolithic distribution - bioperl

2009-08-17 Thread David Golden
libwin32 did it. It wasn't that many dists. Jan Dubois might have pointers. The thing that jumps out to me as a potential problem is dependencly management. Particularly, if anything is mutually dependent, they should stay in the same dist. David On Aug 17, 2009 8:29 AM, Chris Fields

Re: should we still be registering module namespaces?

2009-08-17 Thread nadim khemir
On Monday 17 August 2009 16.48.24 Jonathan Swartz wrote: Is there still a point to registering module namespaces on PAUSE? People registering a namespace are the exception. I don't see any need for it.

Re: should we still be registering module namespaces?

2009-08-17 Thread Andy Lester
On Aug 17, 2009, at 10:41 AM, nadim khemir wrote: On Monday 17 August 2009 16.48.24 Jonathan Swartz wrote: Is there still a point to registering module namespaces on PAUSE? People registering a namespace are the exception. I don't see any need for it. How about the reverse: Is there