I'd go for Device::Car::Tesla(::ModelS)?. Car, not Auto, because in most of the
English-speaking world auto means automatic, not automobile.
--
David Cantrell
This electrogram was despatched by wireless field telegraph. I would therefore
ask that the recipient be so kind as to excuse any
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:15:22 +0100
David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk wrote:
I'd go for Device::Car::Tesla(::ModelS)?. Car, not Auto, because in
most of the English-speaking world auto means automatic, not
automobile.
This ^.
Also, I would suggest including the ::ModelS, as it's entirely
I'd suggest Vehicle instead of Car since future instances might be trucks,
vans, motorcycles, etc.
Sent from my phone (sorry if my reply is brief, ask me again when I'm at a
real keyboard)
On Sep 12, 2013 1:47 AM, Aaron Trevena aaron.trev...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 September 2013 07:58,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Smylers smyl...@stripey.com wrote:
David Precious writes:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:15:22 +0100
David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk wrote:
I'd go for Device::Car::Tesla(::ModelS)?. Car, not Auto, because in
most of the English-speaking world auto means
David Precious writes:
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:15:22 +0100
David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk wrote:
I'd go for Device::Car::Tesla(::ModelS)?. Car, not Auto, because in
most of the English-speaking world auto means automatic, not
automobile.
Also, I would suggest including the
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:38:00PM +0100, Smylers wrote:
How about Vehicle::Tesla::ModelS then?
Does putting Device:: in front of that lot actually add anything, other
than to the unwieldiness of the name?
Vehicle:: doesn't generalize very well to toasters, refrigerators,
etc. If a new
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Greg Lindahl lind...@pbm.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:38:00PM +0100, Smylers wrote:
How about Vehicle::Tesla::ModelS then?
Does putting Device:: in front of that lot actually add anything, other
than to the unwieldiness of the name?
Vehicle::
