In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ken Williams
wrote:
Ideally, I think, CPAN or CPANPLUS would tell the user the requested
module is available in the following distributions, which one do you
want to install?.
Although that would perhaps be a nice feature to have according to some (
although i feel it
On Jun 17, 2005, at 4:43 AM, imacat wrote:
I'm forwarding this whole thread to Jos Boumans (author of
CPANPLUS),
Michael G Schwern (author of ExtUtils::MakeMaker) and the
module-authors'
list.
Sorry, with several pages worth of top quoting, i have no idea what
this thread is about, or
On Jun 17, 2005, at 7:49 PM, Rob Janes wrote:
so basically the executive summary is that cpanplus does not report
adequately system dependency failures, like a missing c compiler or a
missing library.
As outlined in my other email, that is because it can not (it has no
way of knowing that
On Jun 19, 2005, at 10:13 AM, Barbie wrote:
Having thought about this a little more over the last 2 days, I have a
suggestion. Following along the lines of Module::Install, a
Module::External
(or appropriate name), is bundled with the appropriate application,
that can
check for compilers,
On Jun 19, 2005, at 4:53 PM, Rob Janes wrote:
i'm not saying that cpanplus's reporting is inadequate, so much as
that i'm saying that it appears to be causing some misclassification
and confusion.
If you're replying to a previous statement, it'd be helpful if you
leave that part of the
On Oct 1, 2008, at 5:11 AM, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 01:04:02 +0300, Gabor Szabo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
BTW Could I somehow install all the dependencies of a module but not
the module itself?
You mean like you File::HomeDir requires newest MakeMaker and maybe
more but
