Re: Finding the module you want (was: New module Mail::SendEasy)

2004-02-11 Thread Smylers
on various topics tentatively related to Perl, and then the actual point of Cpan, the modules, gets lost among all the ranting and bickering. Let's get some good material written first, then worry about where to stick it ... Smylers

Re: Finding the module you want (was: New module Mail::SendEasy)

2004-02-11 Thread Smylers
of CGI-related modules: I'd like it to put people off using CGI::Lite so that I can stop trying to maintain it and everybody can use something saner instead ... Smylers

Re: Finding the module you want (was: New module Mail::SendEasy)

2004-02-11 Thread Smylers
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Finding the module you want (was: New module Mail::SendEasy) From: Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 11 Feb 2004 10:25:07 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Smylers) writes: Let's get some good material written first

Re: DateTime (Was: New module Mail::SendEasy)

2004-02-05 Thread Smylers
. (Some kind of intro tutorial/overview is one posibility, but I'm hesitant to suggest combatting the problem of overwhelming docs by adding yet more docs to them ...) Smylers

Re: CVS version module name

2004-02-05 Thread Smylers
? Those avoid the problem for your module (Foo/CVS.pm is OK), but it makes it awkward for anybody else ever to tag another part on the end, since that would again require a directory called CVS/. Smylers

Re: New module Mail::SendEasy

2004-02-05 Thread Smylers
, Mail::Mailer, ... Smylers

Re: RFC: Date::Iterator

2003-12-20 Thread Smylers
in the Date::Calc:: namespace, nobody's interfering with anybody else and the names make it blindingly obvious which cabal each module belongs to. Smylers

Re: Tie::Array::Sorted

2003-11-13 Thread Smylers
sure it definitely isn't a set. 'The set of all the numbers of houses I've ever lived at' doesn't contain any duplicates, even if I've lived at both 7 Argumentative Avenue and 7 Quarrel Grove. Smylers

Re: Class::FakeAttributes -- Opinions Wanted

2003-11-04 Thread Smylers
A. Pagaltzis writes: * Smylers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-11-03 00:40]: ... safety isn't really the point -- Wx::StaticBoxSizer can safely be inherited from, Well, you can't safely store your own attributes in a $self hashref provided by a superclass; True, but that's 'normal' Perl

Re: Class::FakeAttributes -- Opinions Wanted

2003-11-04 Thread Smylers
more descriptive of the purpose rather than the implementation, The purpose is to make up for not being able to use 'real' attributes because the object isn't based on a hash-ref, so having to put them somewhere else. Smylers

Re: Class::FakeAttributes -- Opinions Wanted

2003-11-04 Thread Smylers
; print @{$hash{foo}}\n; Hence the need for a method that always results in pushing on to the array reference stored in the hash, regardless of whether it already has any values in there. Smylers

Re: Class::FakeAttributes -- Opinions Wanted

2003-11-04 Thread Smylers
}};' That's the kind of thing I do all the time with $self when $self is a hash-ref, and hence the desire for attribute_list() to do something difference when I can't use a hash-ref and am using fake, I mean ... out-of-band, attributes instead! Smylers

Re: Class::FakeAttributes -- Opinions Wanted

2003-11-02 Thread Smylers
A. Pagaltzis writes: * Smylers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-10-31 10:55]: http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?Class::FakeAttributes This has been invented by Abigail quite a while ago and is called inside out objects. See http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=219378 Thanks

Re: Class::FakeAttributes -- Opinions Wanted

2003-11-02 Thread Smylers
A. Pagaltzis writes: * Smylers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-11-02 18:05]: However, even now I know the name for the technique I don't think it'd be appropriate to call the module Class::InsideOutAttributes (or similar), because that is describing the module's implementation rather than

Class::FakeAttributes -- Opinions Wanted

2003-10-31 Thread Smylers
didn't spot? Are there any obvious problems or memory leaks? And, of course, the name: is it appropriate? Can you think of anything that better encapsulates that 'oh I want to inherit from one of _those_ but it isn't hash-based' feeling? Thanks for your thoughts on this. Smylers

Re: module to access w3c validator

2003-10-29 Thread Smylers
in the future as: WebService::Validator::HTML::Foo # for appropriate values of 'Foo' WebService::Validator::CSS::W3C And if anybody writes an HTML validator that runs locally and doesn't require web access, then of course it doesn't go under WebService. Smylers

Re: RFC Format::FileSize

2003-08-30 Thread Smylers
as meaningful (if bytes are the unit of something then you should be able to work out that it's a size). - it can be used to format anything whose size or capacity is expressed in bytes, be that a file, a disk, the computer's RAM, a process, a scalar or anything. Indeed. Smylers

Re: UDPM name space finalization

2003-06-04 Thread Smylers
to dialogue boxes, and provides a type of backend. Learning that the particular backend in this instance is a _dialog_ backend does not in anyway add to the knowledge about it: if it wasn't a dialog backend then it wouldn't be under UI::Dialog::Backend. Smylers

Re: UDPM name space finalization

2003-05-30 Thread Smylers
::Dialog::X Unix::Dialog::G Unix::Dialog::K If I saw those I'm not sure I'd guess what G and K stand for. There doesn't seem to be any reason for not using their full names: Unix::Dialog::Gnome Unix::Dialog::KDE And then perhaps: Unix::Dialog::Gnome::Zenity Smylers

<    1   2